B777 Drag Required
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Angel](https://www.pprune.org/images/icons/mpangel.gif)
It occurs to me that when making a descent in ISA plus ..... a lot that I am getting the DREG REQ message.
It could be that the FMC has problems calculating a path with a lot of restrictions (Alt and or speed).
Now my guessing is that it is all about energy and if you are cruising at FL 350 in ISA plus 20 C° you are actually significantly higher with regards to Geopotential altitude.
Amy FMC wizard that can shed some light on this. So far I have been using the engine anti-ice corrections to fix a problem when it is ISA + 20
It could be that the FMC has problems calculating a path with a lot of restrictions (Alt and or speed).
Now my guessing is that it is all about energy and if you are cruising at FL 350 in ISA plus 20 C° you are actually significantly higher with regards to Geopotential altitude.
Amy FMC wizard that can shed some light on this. So far I have been using the engine anti-ice corrections to fix a problem when it is ISA + 20
Ah, as I have found trouble with that is that unless you commence descent really early the darn thing will do it's party trick of flying a reduced ROD (don't have the numbers to hand, yes I know I should know them but old age and all that.... ) until it hits the path, then it hauls the thrust levers closed,.......and then it shouts DRAG REQ![Bored](https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/wbored.gif)
I've used the NAI cheat but I like your cup of tea solution, followed by liberal application of FLCH....
![Bored](https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/wbored.gif)
I've used the NAI cheat but I like your cup of tea solution, followed by liberal application of FLCH....
VNAV on the 777 is a bit of an unfinished symphony. It works very well on takeoff and RNAV final approaches but the bit in between could do with some tweaking, IMHO.
I find descents from cruise level, especially if there are jet streams about, are best done in some other mode, certainly initially. If there are significant changes of wind component on the way down it’ll probably fall out of VNAV PTH anyway.
I find descents from cruise level, especially if there are jet streams about, are best done in some other mode, certainly initially. If there are significant changes of wind component on the way down it’ll probably fall out of VNAV PTH anyway.
Descent winds..
Most likely the descent winds entered in the FMC are not close to the actual winds encountered, the old story "garbage in, garbage out", try doing a wind update nearer to your TOD...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am just getting back on the T7 since 10 years ago and I see that some stuff has really changed.
What puzzles me is that now they have a vertical ANP and RNP but how this works nicely together with VNAV is an open question to me.
Thanks for your input
What puzzles me is that now they have a vertical ANP and RNP but how this works nicely together with VNAV is an open question to me.
Thanks for your input
![](/images/avatars/th_new.gif)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What wind levels are you guys entering. I wonder if two exactly loaded and performing 777's right beside each other from two different companies using different flight plan providers will have different wind entry altitudes leading to different descent paths.
![](/images/avatars/th_banned.gif)
I fly an A320 and it's interesting to see that other types have the same problem. I'll enter descent winds and will still have "MORE DRAG" displayed approaching an altitude constraint.
1980s technology. VHS video and Space Invader days.
1980s technology. VHS video and Space Invader days.
If there’s significant vertical shear on the way down, the airspeed builds or decays at a rate faster than the aeroplane can cope with, especially at high level where there is limited scope for speed changes. This is a natural function of trying to keep to a pre-computed path in the sky as the wind component alters. If you did it in level change (open descent), the path would be a series of curves as the airframe responded dynamically to wind changes while keeping the Mach/IAS constant. If the component changes are more subtle, VNAV can keep to the profile by allowing the speed (drag) to vary.
There are two main ways to deal with this: either let the aeroplane stay on the path but be prepared for bouts of speedbrake alternating with power, or make an educated guess at where the idle power ToD really is and go down in LVL CHG, at least to begin with.
If you cross a strong jet core in the descent (which often happens), in VNAV you’ll have to use lots of speedbrake followed by lots of power or vice-versa, depending on the polarity of the shear. A descent in LVL CHG from the same ToD point will see changes in pitch and RoD but probably end up close to the VNAV path after transiting the shear. Your choice...
There are two main ways to deal with this: either let the aeroplane stay on the path but be prepared for bouts of speedbrake alternating with power, or make an educated guess at where the idle power ToD really is and go down in LVL CHG, at least to begin with.
If you cross a strong jet core in the descent (which often happens), in VNAV you’ll have to use lots of speedbrake followed by lots of power or vice-versa, depending on the polarity of the shear. A descent in LVL CHG from the same ToD point will see changes in pitch and RoD but probably end up close to the VNAV path after transiting the shear. Your choice...
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fairly close to the colonial capitol
Age: 56
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FullWings' advice spans types.
I guess the trick is in knowing what (and when) the optimal changes in pitch and RoD are. Going by the arc of the trend of the purple lines and numbers is my march towards at least part of the perfection that you suggest in LVL CHG, FW.
I guess the trick is in knowing what (and when) the optimal changes in pitch and RoD are. Going by the arc of the trend of the purple lines and numbers is my march towards at least part of the perfection that you suggest in LVL CHG, FW.