Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Honeywell Primus 660 weather radar tilt

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Honeywell Primus 660 weather radar tilt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Oct 2012, 12:10
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: <60 minutes
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Honeywell Primus 660 weather radar tilt

The Honeywell Primus 660 AWR Pilot manual (rev 3) states that

"The stabilization system uses the aircraft attitude source as a reference" for tilt setting. Furthermore; "hold the elevation of the antenna beam relative to the earth’s surface constant at all azimuths, regardless of aircraft bank and pitch maneuvers".

Can anyone confirm the 660 AWR TILT, at ZERO degrees, is aligned with the pitch attitude? (inferring that the "aircraft attitude source" quoted above does not refer to a gyro/platform/AHRS etc). A reference for same would be appreciated.

Been elsewhere on this forum and found some conflicting opinions which don't help me to explain away some erroneous tilt returns from my aircraft.

Last edited by darkbarly; 31st Oct 2012 at 11:35.
darkbarly is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2012, 12:59
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: FL390
Posts: 253
Received 16 Likes on 5 Posts
"The stabilization system uses the aircraft attitude source as a reference" for tilt setting. Furthermore; "hold the elevation of the antenna beam relative to the earth’s surface constant at all azimuths, regardless of aircraft bank and pitch maneuvers".
Looks to me like it maintains the attitude selected on the control panel irrespective of aircraft attitude. As it's meant to...
Fursty Ferret is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2012, 14:33
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: <60 minutes
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do not understand your answer. Question is underlined.
darkbarly is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2012, 17:01
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NY - USA
Age: 68
Posts: 75
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by darkbarly
Do not understand your answer. Question is underlined.
I'm away from my office at the moment and can not give you a chapter and verse manual reference for the Primus 660 in particular, but I can tell you that the radar stabilization system does receive its input from the aircraft's primary attitude reference system. Depending on the model aircraft, that reference may be an IRU, an AHRS or a remote mechanical horizontal/vertical gyro.

Tilt is referenced to the earth's surface. If the aircraft is flying perfectly level, with the AWR tilt set to zero, the angle of the antenna pitch axis (as it sweeps side-to-side) will be parallel to the horizon.

If the aircraft pitches up 5 degrees in a climb, the AWR antenna will simultaneously pitch down 5 degrees to keep the sweep aligned with the horizon. Likewise if the aircraft pitches down 5 degrees, the antenna will pitch up 5 degrees.

If, from level flight, the aircraft enters a 20 degree left bank, The antenna horizontal sweep will change to an upper left to lower right path ( referenced to the wings), again to keep the antenna sweep aligned with the horizon.

What kind of tilt problem are you having that spurred your question? Stabilization issues are a very common symptom of a malfunctioning AWR. Sometimes due to problems with the input from the aircraft's attitude reference system, but more likely due to issues with the motors or gearing used to drive the antenna vertically or horizontally.
JRBarrett is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2012, 20:13
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: <60 minutes
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

What kind of tilt problem are you having that spurred your question?
Today at 27000agl, beam bottom earth return at 30 miles required -3 deg tilt. Geometrically this angle should be 5.6 deg tilt down selection(8.4-1/2 beam width or 2.8 in my case)

Or lets say then we use TIP, a well known method for establishing tilt. 27000/30 = 9. Therefore -3+9 = +6 tilt to give beam bottom horizontal.

However, if beam width 2.8 deg for my 18" RTA is correct then it appears zero tilt out by +3.2 deg(which, if my sums are right, would mean not seeing a return 9000'ish above my level at 30nm)

I notice various sources mix the terms 'reference to horizon', 'parallel to earth surface' and 'attitude referenced'. These can all have different meanings for tilt I believe.

I understand that the tilt will not alter when manoeuvring with a stabilized system, but need to address where exactly ZERO TILT is referenced to when a calibrated LRU is fitted to the aircraft(Embraer 190).
darkbarly is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.