Landing Performance
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: engineer at large
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, hell, you didnt tell me you had on o those new fangled multi-flap setting thangs...and you can land on many flap settins...hot damn...
so since speed aint no issue wit you...which CAT minima do you figurin using on da chart?
or don that she'et make a heap o difference to ya all...
just 'git er down"?
so since speed aint no issue wit you...which CAT minima do you figurin using on da chart?
or don that she'et make a heap o difference to ya all...
just 'git er down"?
you may ask questions- of course always cat A for best possible minimums !
seriously... when the aeroplane is approved for many flap settings and gives you tables for each flap setting you have to look at the actual vref at a given configuration , because vref is the thing category depends on .
seriously... when the aeroplane is approved for many flap settings and gives you tables for each flap setting you have to look at the actual vref at a given configuration , because vref is the thing category depends on .
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: engineer at large
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
with actual weight, flap settings give VREF
VREF X 1.3 equals final approach speed....but
then there are MET conditions...winds.
perhaps, far down the variable list, VREF is a component of the CAT, but it is but one that trumps...
final approach speed rules.
VREF X 1.3 equals final approach speed....but
then there are MET conditions...winds.
perhaps, far down the variable list, VREF is a component of the CAT, but it is but one that trumps...
final approach speed rules.