FMS Speed reduction 737 Classic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Denmark
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FMS Speed reduction 737 Classic
Guys,
question: I have entered an approach, all points are in, on the GS intercept point which name ist REDGO i want to have 210/3000ft. now the controller wants me to maintain highspeed as long as possible, so i fly also 270kt below 100 or more. does the fmc and the vnav path give me still good infos about the speed reduction, i mean, is the path pointer still valid? or what do i have to enter in the fmc that im not to fast for the point, when i start reduction? what effect has it to delete the 240kt/below F100?
Thanks so much
OD
question: I have entered an approach, all points are in, on the GS intercept point which name ist REDGO i want to have 210/3000ft. now the controller wants me to maintain highspeed as long as possible, so i fly also 270kt below 100 or more. does the fmc and the vnav path give me still good infos about the speed reduction, i mean, is the path pointer still valid? or what do i have to enter in the fmc that im not to fast for the point, when i start reduction? what effect has it to delete the 240kt/below F100?
Thanks so much
OD
ECON cruise, LR cruise...
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: MIRSI hold - give or take...
Age: 52
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you program DESC page with 270/100 and set REDGO as 210/3000, then yes, the FMC will do the trick. However, remember to put any TWC into the DESC FCST page, or all your margins are gone
Also, 210 kias for GS intercept might be a bit excessive, even for a CL - but I'm sure you're aware of this
Enjoy - best regards
Empty
Also, 210 kias for GS intercept might be a bit excessive, even for a CL - but I'm sure you're aware of this
Enjoy - best regards
Empty
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have always found the FMC on the 737 vastly over-optimistic in terms of what it can and cannot do, even when correctly 'programmed'. Always worth keeping a 'weather eye' on the 3x table.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Always worth keeping a 'weather eye' on the 3x table.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Europe-the sunshine side
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Let's say you want to maintain 270kt till FL70. Then reduce to 250 kt ,followed by 210 at REDGO.
You should select (in descent page ) , descent speed 270 ,speed restriction 250kt/FL70 ,and in legs page REDGO 210/3000 . This way you'll create a vertical profile and enable the FMS to create a path.If the FMS will think something is not right ,you'll get a message ,like "steep descenty after XX ' ,for ex.
To be more accurate,don't forget to fill the forecast page ,at least with some estimated wind,and qnh.
And don't believe the ones telling you the VNAV it's never working ,it's just not knowing to make use of it. It's a computer, it has to have corect in-data to give correct output.
You should select (in descent page ) , descent speed 270 ,speed restriction 250kt/FL70 ,and in legs page REDGO 210/3000 . This way you'll create a vertical profile and enable the FMS to create a path.If the FMS will think something is not right ,you'll get a message ,like "steep descenty after XX ' ,for ex.
To be more accurate,don't forget to fill the forecast page ,at least with some estimated wind,and qnh.
And don't believe the ones telling you the VNAV it's never working ,it's just not knowing to make use of it. It's a computer, it has to have corect in-data to give correct output.
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: England
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wouldn`t it be more fun to just work it out yourself? Automation for the sake of it perhaps
I often get a descent clnc to FL200 to be level by TIGER. I don`t need an FMC to tell me when to descend and I `ve never yet been embarrassed.
I often get a descent clnc to FL200 to be level by TIGER. I don`t need an FMC to tell me when to descend and I `ve never yet been embarrassed.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wouldn`t it be more fun to just work it out yourself? Automation for the sake of it perhaps