Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Fuel Suction Feed question???

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Fuel Suction Feed question???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Feb 2006, 19:32
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fuel Suction Feed question???

Hi,

-In the event of all AC power loss, it is possible to restart engines after flame-out. What is the maximum suction feed ceiling (mostly for airliners)?

-Can airplane flying in adverse conditions be affected by engine(s) operating for an extended period of time on suction feed?

-I found this statement: apparently "new" fuel contains a good deal of entrained air that makes suction feed less reliable (this is called "fuel weathering"). Is this true?

Feedback appreciated. Thank you.
Best regards
AeroTech is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2006, 08:22
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Stockholm Sweden
Age: 74
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When I used to do installation ground runs on the Tristar, we used to run the engine to take off power, and then turn off all the wing tank fuel pumps. Nothing should happen. Fuel tanks are pressurised slightly in flight, so should work better when flying.
Swedish Steve is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2006, 08:41
  #3 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't know about 3), but for the 737 Boeing state that gravity feed should suffice up to 30,000ft.
BOAC is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2006, 08:44
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Europe
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You are probably looking at something like FL200-250 as maximum for gravity feed. Of course it depends on type, but also on which tanks you are feeding from. Outboard tanks will generally have a higher max level for gravity feed than inboard and center tanks.
Clarence Oveur is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2006, 14:43
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 496
Received 12 Likes on 2 Posts
Interesting, if not highly unlikely, question. You are talking about failure of all generators and all engines.

On the 737 each engine has an engine driven fuel pump, but if the engine has failed it may not be turning enough to deliver fuel for restart. If your windmill relight envelope started at say FL240 (depends upon type) then you would certainly have enough altitude from cruise levels to dive and reach Vno by this level. This may be enough to wind-up the N2 sufficiently to operate the EDP to give you fuel for a relight.

The wing tanks have a small positive head of pressure from the surge tank vents but I doubt it is enough to feed a stopped engine.

A good one for the end of a sim trip.
CaptainSandL is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2006, 00:48
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canberra Australia
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The main purpose of fuel booster pumps is to prevent cavitation at the high pressure pumps feeding the fuel injectors.

Cavitation soon turns a high pressure pump into a piece of junk so avoid suction feed like the plague.
Milt is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2006, 10:13
  #7 (permalink)  
idg
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: hongkong
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AT,
I believe you are correct in that 'new' fuel does indeed contain a large amout of entrained gas that 'boils' off as outside air pressure reduces during climb. If you loose your booster pumps (due to electrics loss for instance) then the risk of cavitation is high for the first 30 minutes or so when the a/c is above FL170. I think this is the height above which the phenomenon starts to occur.

It is my understanding that once the gas has boiled off then this chance of cavitation ceases to be a problem. In this instance if you have tankered fuel into a port and not refuelled (as currently is the case I understand for some carriers at LHR) then you don't have the gas in the fuel to start with.

Gravity feeding (in the Airbus) for a relight or continued engine operation, would only be assured once the fuel has been 'degassed' for 30 minutes. I would assume this is the same for all types.

Swedish Steve, I have not heard before that the tanks are slightly pressurised in flight. would the pressure be coming from the vent tank's NACA duct ? Interesting.
idg is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2006, 10:23
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 496
Received 12 Likes on 2 Posts
IDG,
From Boeing Airliner Sep-Oct 1966 page 12, in an article on the 737 fuel system:
“A small positive pressure is maintained in the tank during flight by ram air entering the wing tip vent scoop. This positive pressure serves to reduce fuel evaporation at high altitude and to maintain pressure at the boost pump and by-pass inlets.”
S&L
CaptainSandL is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.