Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Calculating groundspeed from DME?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Calculating groundspeed from DME?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Sep 2005, 13:41
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Calculating groundspeed from DME?

Does anyone have a method for calculating groundspeed from DME?
I recall the RAF using a method, any ideas?

Thanks
busflyer is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2005, 14:10
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From the DME, note the distance travelled in 36 seconds. Since 36 seconds = 1% of one hour, multiply this figure by 100 to get the groundspeed.

I seem to remember that this is particularly well-suited to fairly fast a/c (i.e. > 250 kts), presumably because the absolute error in speed is less significant, as is the absolute error caused by the difference in slant range -vs- track miles.
mooretk is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2005, 18:15
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Timing a DME change over 36 sec is also well suited for DME homing if the DME doesn't have a groundspeed readout.
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2005, 19:51
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,984
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well I wished I had been given a penny for every groundspeed check I did using DME when I was on the B737-200!!

For a quick check 36 secs is OK but I used to used 3 or even 6 mins if I wanted a really accurate one.

Mind you, after a while you got that good at it that you could watch the DME (barrel type presentation) rate of change and take a good guess at the groundspeed.

It was quite amusing after a long day to be airtaxied back home and they had groundspeed and time to station read out - such luxuries!!
fireflybob is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2005, 08:54
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Eagan, MN
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, there could be so many derived formulas....the ones previously mentioned, radial to arc, arc to radial, it became second nature. All now lost, as in elementary school my grandson now uses a calculator for what had to become 2nd nature for us...the times tables,etc. Progress? We old fogies know it could be done, and could be 2nd nature. We marvelled at guys being able to do Adcock Range approaches, and even more 'basic' approaches, before 'our time'.. That we didn't have to do them with oh so modern ADF-DME-VOR-Loran-Starshots, just means time marched on, I guess. And it continues, and nothing really changes.
Semaphore Sam is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.