Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Just checked out & mixed feeling re the bus

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Just checked out & mixed feeling re the bus

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Aug 2005, 12:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 1997
Location: 5530N
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just checked out & mixed feeling re the bus

Just checked out on the 320s having spent many yrs on the 737....did 4 yrs prev on the 330.

Here is my gripes

The QRH is a mine field.....one has to go out of checklists to back into checklists to complete checklists. The smoke removal checklist was written by lawyers.

The MCDU is so user unfriendly compared to the 737......selecting airports pb beside the fcu fills in the ND with every friggin airport as agains the pertinant ones.

Wx radar is way too sensitive and the on/off and predictive w/s toggle swtchs are a joke...way to fiddly.

Our company didnt select the terrain prog which shows the highest and lowest terrain with actual figs...waste of time in many ways for sit awareness.

Aircraft way too speed senstive in flap retraction. If your resonably heavy Fplus is close to S plus and at the very time you are on to departure, turning, cleared to a different altitude...so one has very much to prioritize re not getting a flap overspeed and the rest will follow. Previous type wasnt so critical.

Poor climb perf above FL270

The pros

Big cockpit as against looking out of a letter box
Once its set up there is F. A to do....yet if you dont watch it it'll hang you.
The autobrakes are immense and hugely impressive.
Perf for T/O and Ldg not an issue.....bleeds off T/O without APU and with is mega.....B737 was a tricky affair if not familar.
AP very good in gusty wx
Air Con very good...dont feel as tired as on previous type after multi sector


Theres much more good to come as time on type marchs on but I thought I'd throw my bit in.
Bearcat is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2005, 14:41
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: north
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bearcat,

Poor climb perf above FL270
According to BADA rev 3.6, this isn't necessary
the case. Depending on weight and which exact
FL you mean. In some cases the A320 has
better and equal FPM compared with the B734 and B738.
Also looks like the A320 has better FF all the way at nominal weights.
Looks like it actually is BELOW FL270 that the difference is significant...

Below are the numbers for A320 - B734 - B738
(edited to fit the screen)

Cheers,

M

XPMorten is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2005, 18:37
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 414
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Bearcat, stick with it and I think you'll get to like it more. While I agree that the QRH is a bitch and the manuals leave a bit to be desired the protections such as Apha Floor in event of a GWPS going off and Groundspeed Mini function on a sh..ty weather approach more than compensate for that.
Fly3 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.