Singapore Airlines near miss in Perth Australia
Guest
Posts: n/a
Singapore Airlines near miss in Perth Australia
A Singapore Airlines 777 ignored instructions to hold short of runway21 at Perth Airport in Australia today. The Ansett Airbus on short final was forced to execute a last minute go-around. The incident happened at 0910 local time.
Who will SIA blame this time?
Who will SIA blame this time?
Guest
Posts: n/a
You must be a "newby", Guv. It's part of an ongoing anti-SIA crusade, by Gladiator, and his tagalong, titan, to avenge their court-enforced payments of their 1/4 million dollar [each] "breach of employment contract" penalties.
Either that, or they are self appointed watchdogs, who report solely on Singapore Airlines alleged incidents, whilst ignoring all other carriers.
Biased? maybe. Litigious? Time will tell!
Either that, or they are self appointed watchdogs, who report solely on Singapore Airlines alleged incidents, whilst ignoring all other carriers.
Biased? maybe. Litigious? Time will tell!
Guest
Posts: n/a
KaptinM:
SIA has NEVER been to court over the bond!!
Not only are you uninformed, but you are incapable of comprehending the dozens of times that this fact has been regurgitated.
GUV:
Wen is news not news? The facts are there. At 0910 local on 23/11/00 a SIA 777 disobeyed an instruction to hold short and taxied into the path of an Ansett Airbus on short final, forcing the Airbus to do a go-around.
Which part do you consider un-newsworthy?
I would have thought SIA would be a little gun shy at the moment over illegal runway incursions.
Titan - a training issue arises here - attack the arguement, fact, or opinion. Don't abuse the writer.
I'll delete your entire post next time you try this on. If you persist I will globally delete your posts for the day, next time the month and then the year if nescessary.
I know you have them all stored - It'll be handy for setting up your own site. PPRuNe Towers
[This message has been edited by PPRuNe Towers (edited 27 November 2000).]
Guest
Posts: n/a
Maybe newsworthy at the local aero club, for all the week-end warriors to "ooh" and "aahh" over, titan, and of course for the media, who will [like you] try to capitalise on any minor infraction SQ makes, following the Taiwan crash.
However, if ALL the go-arounds carried out on a daily basis, around the world, due to runway incursions were reported by the press, it would be equivalent to reading the never-ending drivel spewed out by you and glad, here on PPRuNe!
However, if ALL the go-arounds carried out on a daily basis, around the world, due to runway incursions were reported by the press, it would be equivalent to reading the never-ending drivel spewed out by you and glad, here on PPRuNe!
Guest
Posts: n/a
It is not the missed approach that is unique, rather, the unauthorised runway incursion by an SIA aircraft. That is unusual and in light of the SQ6 accident, highly relevant.
Does SQ need to examine its training philosphy to correctly emphasise safety during ground manouvering?
Does SQ need to examine its training philosphy to correctly emphasise safety during ground manouvering?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Storyman/NCC-1701e,
FYI, SIA's Dr Cheong has publicly accepted responsibility for the SQ6 accident. I don't think SIA has pushed/or are pushing the blame on anyone else.
As to why the Capt's nationality was made known, don't you think it is more transparent than saying "pilots nationality withheld"?
Dr Cheong specifically said that it was an SIA aircraft, flown by SIA pilots, on the wrong runway. Note that he didn't say flown by a Malaysian pilot!
If or when SIA did not reveal any information, they will be accused of withholding/hiding information. Yet when they do, they are accused of other things.
Makes you wonder.....
If indeed there was a runway incursion, there will be an incident report filed, and SIA will act on it accordingly.
FYI, SIA's Dr Cheong has publicly accepted responsibility for the SQ6 accident. I don't think SIA has pushed/or are pushing the blame on anyone else.
As to why the Capt's nationality was made known, don't you think it is more transparent than saying "pilots nationality withheld"?
Dr Cheong specifically said that it was an SIA aircraft, flown by SIA pilots, on the wrong runway. Note that he didn't say flown by a Malaysian pilot!
If or when SIA did not reveal any information, they will be accused of withholding/hiding information. Yet when they do, they are accused of other things.
Makes you wonder.....
If indeed there was a runway incursion, there will be an incident report filed, and SIA will act on it accordingly.
Guest
Posts: n/a
TITAN
NEWS is when the truth is verified . In the case of QF after the BKK incident , at least the media attempt to verify the truth .
In this case , choice if words is deliberately used to sensationalise the supposed incident . Very good for third grade magazine but hardly fitting for a professional pilot .
Pilots had always been rated higher than the medical profession in public opinion . I really hope it remains this way
[This message has been edited by PILLOW (edited 01 December 2000).]
NEWS is when the truth is verified . In the case of QF after the BKK incident , at least the media attempt to verify the truth .
In this case , choice if words is deliberately used to sensationalise the supposed incident . Very good for third grade magazine but hardly fitting for a professional pilot .
Pilots had always been rated higher than the medical profession in public opinion . I really hope it remains this way
[This message has been edited by PILLOW (edited 01 December 2000).]
Guest
Posts: n/a
BASI reports are now available online, presumably, so that the wider aviation community can learn from past accidents and incidents.
Now, what can we all learn from this one?
<A HREF="http://www.basi.gov.au/occurs/ob199805323.htm" TARGET="_blank">http://www.basi.gov.au/occurs/ob199805323.htm</A>
Now, what can we all learn from this one?
<A HREF="http://www.basi.gov.au/occurs/ob199805323.htm" TARGET="_blank">http://www.basi.gov.au/occurs/ob199805323.htm</A>
