Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

A380 5hr circling

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

A380 5hr circling

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Apr 2024, 20:11
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Between a rock & a hard place.
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 7 Posts
A380 5hr circling

This story came up on my news feed and this bit thst caught my attention was the aircraft circling for 5hrs to burn/dump fuel.

I know SIN - LHR is a long distance flight and the A380 is on the 'likes a drink' side, but is 5hrs the norm? Seems a long time. Over to the A380 jockeys.

https://airlive.net/news/2024/04/23/british-airways-a380-ba12-circled-for-5-hours-following-a-technical-issue/?amp=1
PC767 is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2024, 20:42
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,555
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Not sure about the techie side of the 380 but the comment in the linked article that “The typical flight duration is 10 hours,” SIN-LHR isn’t even close to being correct so is the claim that the flight “ started to circle over the sea to dump/burn fuel for 5 hours” accurate?
wiggy is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2024, 20:53
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: same planet as yours
Posts: 551
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by wiggy
... so is the claim that the flight “ started to circle over the sea to dump/burn fuel for 5 hours” accurate?
No, quick check on FR24, they were in holding patterns over the sea for exactly 4 hours. And of course no idea on how long they were actually dumping fuel.
DIBO is online now  
Old 24th Apr 2024, 06:14
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Alberta
Posts: 27
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A380 dumps 2500kg/min but can only dump the transfer tanks so if the jet had say 140tons on board it would be able to jettison about 50 tons which would take 20mins. Can’t think of a failure (even loss of anti-skid on all gear) that would require the jet to burn fuel. You would have the performance to land immediately and after jettison with careful brake management the brake energy could be kept under control.
Bluffontheriver123 is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2024, 07:18
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Middle East
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Allegedly double Weather Radar fault
RudderTrimZero is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2024, 07:41
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,555
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by RudderTrimZero
Allegedly double Weather Radar fault
Ah, not a great thing to have on any route but certainly not on that sector.

As for the holding, I can now see it was indeed 4 hours plus…whatever the reason I suppose if circumstances permitted that gave time for a meal service before dumping people back into the terminal…
wiggy is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2024, 08:20
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,076
Received 66 Likes on 40 Posts
A380 main landing gears are very precious spare parts these days.
Less Hair is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2024, 12:21
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,909
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Less Hair
A380 main landing gears are very precious spare parts these days.
Any histroy of the MLG needing to be replaced after a heavy landing ?
atakacs is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2024, 13:01
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,536
Received 49 Likes on 31 Posts
BA had injured cabin crew due to turbulence on that route a few months ago so proceeding without the weather radar wouldn’t have been a good idea even if the OPS manual allowed it.

SIN - LHR is around 14 hours so lots of fuel onboard, even more if ME detours were needed.

The flight had already suffered a 4 hour delay to its departure due to a weather radar fault.
krismiler is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2024, 13:19
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,076
Received 66 Likes on 40 Posts
Originally Posted by atakacs
Any histroy of the MLG needing to be replaced after a heavy landing ?
Not that I knew. They are just not made new again. This is why treating them carefully and avoiding overweight landings is the way to go.
Less Hair is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2024, 16:57
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 183
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Bluffontheriver123
A380 dumps 2500kg/min but can only dump the transfer tanks so if the jet had say 140tons on board it would be able to jettison about 50 tons which would take 20mins. Can’t think of a failure (even loss of anti-skid on all gear) that would require the jet to burn fuel. You would have the performance to land immediately and after jettison with careful brake management the brake energy could be kept under control.
Having dumped the fuel in the transfer tanks, is it possible to feed fuel back into them from other tanks and then dump it. If so what sort of flow rate can you get?
ASRAAMTOO is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2024, 08:46
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Dubai - sand land.
Age: 55
Posts: 2,832
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ASRAAMTOO
Having dumped the fuel in the transfer tanks, is it possible to feed fuel back into them from other tanks and then dump it. If so what sort of flow rate can you get?
No. Not possible.
White Knight is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.