Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Latest Boeing News

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Latest Boeing News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Jun 2024, 15:57
  #321 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 69
Posts: 4,532
Received 293 Likes on 143 Posts
Originally Posted by BonnieLass
Well there is a sort of precedent there...prior to Airbus Industries getting themselves all sorted out and becoming effectively #2 behind Boeing.....didn't Boeing do exactly that when they went shopping and purchased airliner division at McDonnell-Douglas in 1997?
MacDac had stopped being a significant player in the commercial aircraft market well before the Boeing merger - Airbus had already thoroughly eaten MacDac's lunch and was the strong #2 (at the time, most of the Airbus growth had come at the expense of MacDac, as a result the MacDac market share was ~10%). At the time of the merger, MacDac's only viable product was the MD-90 (the MD-11 had been a major flop, and the MD-95/717 was still years away from type cert).
So no, not really comparable at all...
tdracer is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2024, 19:03
  #322 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Gloucestershire
Age: 77
Posts: 137
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by BonnieLass
Now that Spirit Aerosystems is about to be sold and carved up tween Boeing and Airbus Industries, ..
Not wishing to be pedantic but Airbus Industrie was reorganised 23 years ago, becoming first EADS, then later just Airbus in 2015.
SRMman is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2024, 23:36
  #323 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Puget Sound, WA
Posts: 193
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by OldnGrounded
Sheesh. They seem simply unable to straighten up and fly right.

From The Air Current story cited above by DaveReidUK:
"Shareholder value is #1 but we keep hearing about this confusing engineering and safety thing" has been Boeing C-suite cultural for three decades now.

Bear in mind MD was a hot mess for a decade or maybe four when "they bought Boeing with Boeing's money."
If Airbus takes Boeing Commercial Airplane division, adding to former ATR (50% held by Airbus) and Bombardier, that will be a >90% domination by 1 Supplier. Totally unacceptable in terms of market sanity.
It might be acceptable in terms of quality and safety.

From my moderately aviation tech enlightened SLF viewpoint, I prefer the Boeing approach to flight deck design, but, dang it, engineering has to execute.
Now that Spirit Aerosystems is about to be sold and carved up tween Boeing and Airbus Industries, I wonder what might happen if, in a strictly hypothetical situation, the US authorities decide that Boeing is too big and too uncontrollable and split the various sectors to the highest bidder.
There are several defense companies that could absorb Boeing defense, although they would for sure want to zero out the negative balance.

As far as space goes, who would even want to touch that? ULA is already deep in decades of inefficiency, and, embarrassingly, can't even remotely compete with SpaceX.

Last edited by remi; 29th Jun 2024 at 01:54.
remi is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2024, 01:52
  #324 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Puget Sound, WA
Posts: 193
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Starliner but wow

https://spacenews.com/starliner-to-r...hruster-tests/

Paraphrasing: "We could use it as an emergency vehicle if the emergency was aliens or re-entry, but we're going to study this otherwise."
remi is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2024, 07:22
  #325 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by remi
Starliner but wow

https://spacenews.com/starliner-to-r...hruster-tests/

Paraphrasing: "We could use it as an emergency vehicle if the emergency was aliens or re-entry, but we're going to study this otherwise."
My understanding is that the parts of the thruster they want/need to examine will be discarded & lost during re-entry.

So it's not an issue of crew safety during this re-entry, but the importance of tracking down the underlying problem for future missions.
Peter H is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2024, 13:02
  #326 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 298
Received 297 Likes on 159 Posts
Astronauts thinking "Just think, we're dependent on the company that made the 737 MAX..."
artee is online now  
The following 4 users liked this post by artee:
Old 29th Jun 2024, 13:56
  #327 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Within AM radio broadcast range of downtown Chicago
Age: 72
Posts: 897
Received 32 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by artee
Astronauts thinking "Just think, we're dependent on the company that made the 737 MAX..."
Which is an insult to the careers of both astronauts crewing this test flight, but hey.
WillowRun 6-3 is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2024, 14:37
  #328 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,634
Received 115 Likes on 64 Posts
I understood the joke.
Capn Bloggs is offline  
The following 4 users liked this post by Capn Bloggs:
Old 29th Jun 2024, 15:09
  #329 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by WillowRun 6-3
Which is an insult to the careers of both astronauts crewing this test flight, but hey.
Oh come on, it's a play on an old astronaut joke.

“I guess the question I'm asked the most often is: "When you were sitting in that capsule listening to the count-down, how did you feel?" Well, the answer to that one is easy. I felt exactly how you would feel if you were getting ready to launch and knew you were sitting on top of two million parts -- all built by the lowest bidder on a government contract.” John Glenn
Peter H is offline  
The following 11 users liked this post by Peter H:
Old 30th Jun 2024, 01:16
  #330 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Within AM radio broadcast range of downtown Chicago
Age: 72
Posts: 897
Received 32 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Peter H
Oh come on, it's a play on an old astronaut joke.

“I guess the question I'm asked the most often is: "When you were sitting in that capsule listening to the count-down, how did you feel?" Well, the answer to that one is easy. I felt exactly how you would feel if you were getting ready to launch and knew you were sitting on top of two million parts -- all built by the lowest bidder on a government contract.” John Glenn
Well, as a child of the 1960s, and an enthusiast about NASA since.... ever, it so happens I'm familiar with that joke. The context of both the question that had been asked back then and the reply, however, was quite significantly different than the 737 MAX air crash disaster debacle and ongoing saga of Boeing's travails.

But invoking the lowest bidder quip does have some resonance despite this, as it's darn near certain the two Starliner astronauts would agree that the agency would very much like to have a return to the days when, before launch - at least according to Hollywood - the question often asked was whether anyone knew where Guenter went?


Last edited by WillowRun 6-3; 30th Jun 2024 at 07:57.
WillowRun 6-3 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 30th Jun 2024, 05:18
  #331 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,123
Received 85 Likes on 49 Posts
Guenter Wendt webpage:

PadLeader.com
Less Hair is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2024, 05:35
  #332 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA
Age: 60
Posts: 436
Received 45 Likes on 36 Posts
Did a fellowship in Galveston at UTMB once upon a time. I quickly found out about the Houston space center, and, as it was 20 minutes or so away from Galveston, I became kind of a Regular.
The Engineers (and Astronauts, when they were around) hung out, back then, at a bar called Peetees which was across the street from the south entrance.

i had a fairly long friendship with a guy that started there when mercury was starting up, (he was a high schoo intern) and he remained in charge of their giant vacuum chamber until I moved back north (Well toward the end of the space shuttle era)

i think we need a bunch of 30 y/o engineers from land grant schools wearing shirts with black ties.
421dog is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2024, 14:29
  #333 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2024
Location: HUY/EGNJ
Age: 60
Posts: 149
Received 196 Likes on 78 Posts
In the last couple of hours....

US prosecutors meet Boeing, crash victims as criminal-charges decision looms
BonnieLass is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2024, 15:22
  #334 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Far East
Posts: 308
Received 89 Likes on 66 Posts
Originally Posted by BonnieLass
As a layman I wonder how many times a trial can be circumvented. I mean all those "deals", deferred prosecution, whatever construction, should be limited to absolute exceptional circumstances.

Otherwise a two class jurisdiction sneaks in. Where the wealthy with access to a myriad of expensive attorneys can buy their way out of normality - which is to both parties bring forward their points in a trial and a Jury makes a decision. Especially in criminal cases.

If Boeing (and possibly individuals?) gets away a second time, you can really forget the term "responsibilities", can't you.

waito is offline  
The following 4 users liked this post by waito:
Old 1st Jul 2024, 01:15
  #335 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Within AM radio broadcast range of downtown Chicago
Age: 72
Posts: 897
Received 32 Likes on 11 Posts
WSJ reporting that DOJ has met with families of people killed in the two accidents, and that it will give Boeing two choices. - plead guilty to a fraud-conspiracy charge, or face trial. Per the reporting, DOJ says it will not negotiate any lesser outcome.
Penalties would be $243 million; Boeing can select the firm to monitor its safety and compliance programs subject to DOJ veto.
Article also reports on strenuous objections already being asserted by the families and their counsel.

It's a cheap observation, I realize, but things are going to get very interesting in the U.S. District Court in which this matter is pending.
WillowRun 6-3 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 1st Jul 2024, 02:33
  #336 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Under the radar, over the rainbow
Posts: 822
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by WillowRun 6-3
WSJ reporting that DOJ has met with families of people killed in the two accidents, and that it will give Boeing two choices. - plead guilty to a fraud-conspiracy charge, or face trial.
Seattle Times:

Justice department to offer Boeing a plea deal related to MAX crashes


OldnGrounded is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2024, 04:52
  #337 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Far East
Posts: 308
Received 89 Likes on 66 Posts
Another 244 Million $ fine, accepting being Guilty, 3 years probation and external monitoring, according to Seattle Times. 1 week for Boeing to decide if they accept the deal.

The meeting with Families attorneys was only informative, no changes in the proposal.

A judge has to approve. WillowRun, is this a simple yes/no decision, and is the proposal "standard business", if it can be called that in the first place?
waito is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2024, 05:58
  #338 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2024
Location: HUY/EGNJ
Age: 60
Posts: 149
Received 196 Likes on 78 Posts
In regard to the families of the Max crashes victims, what happened to those who were shafted by Giradi & Keese, have they now got decent legal support and being taken care of properly?

Losing loved ones in a plane crash is hard enough to come to terms with but then to be shafted by the lawyers they trusted too, was downright disgraceful. I would like to hope they are being looked after correctly now, and although no amount of money will ever take the pain of losing a loved one away, I do hope that they are being taken care of.
BonnieLass is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2024, 06:13
  #339 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 950
Received 307 Likes on 175 Posts
Giradi & Keese - The book "God Bless You, Mr. Rosewater" was supposed to be fiction, not an inspiration.

“In every big transaction,” said Leech, “there is a magic moment during which a man has surrendered a treasure, and during which the man who is due to receive it has not yet done so. An alert lawyer will make that moment his own, possessing the treasure for a magic microsecond, taking a little of it, passing it on. If the man who is to receive the treasure is unused to wealth, has an inferiority complex and shapeless feelings of guilt, as most people do, the lawyer can often take as much as half the bundle, and still receive the recipient’s blubbering thanks.”
― Kurt Vonnegut, God Bless You, Mr. Rosewater

Perhaps Giradi & Keese failed to understand the correct technique.

Last edited by MechEngr; 1st Jul 2024 at 07:04.
MechEngr is online now  
The following users liked this post:
Old 1st Jul 2024, 07:44
  #340 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 127
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Seems that Boeing have finally bought out Spirit.

Boeing agrees to buy spinoff Spirit Aerosystems as part of plan to shore up safety

Wonder what that means for the Airbus parts that Spirit made?
AirScotia is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.