Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Police helicopter crew sue Airbus due to hard landing injuries.

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Police helicopter crew sue Airbus due to hard landing injuries.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Jun 2024, 14:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Devon
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Police helicopter crew sue Airbus due to hard landing injuries.

While on holiday in the Caribbean I read a press report about a police helicopter which had a hard landing a while ago, and the crew were suing Airbus for injuries

The press news doesn't say what their injuries were?

Did Airbus pay them? What did the accident report say?

https://www.caymancompass.com/2022/0...orted-takeoff/
Cabby is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2024, 16:39
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,372
Received 381 Likes on 219 Posts
Originally Posted by Cabby
While on holiday in the Caribbean I read a press report about a police helicopter which had a hard landing a while ago, and the crew were suing Airbus for injuries

The press news doesn't say what their injuries were?

Did Airbus pay them? What did the accident report say?

https://www.caymancompass.com/2022/0...orted-takeoff/
Report is here: https://assets.publishing.service.go...-CPS_01-20.pdf

Hard to imagine how severe their injuries were if they hit the ground from 4 ft going backwards!
212man is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2024, 16:55
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The South
Age: 58
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
And of course the aircraft was maintained i.a.w the manufacturers instructions during its whole life and for a salt laden environment once it arrived in the Caymans including marinisation?
FloaterNorthWest is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 2nd Jun 2024, 16:56
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,372
Received 381 Likes on 219 Posts
Originally Posted by FloaterNorthWest
And of course the aircraft was maintained i.a.w the manufacturers instructions during its whole life and for a salt laden environment once it arrived in the Caymans including marinisation?
Exactly! Writing on my phone limits my enthusiasm for extended typing……
212man is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2024, 19:32
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: canada
Posts: 266
Received 18 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by 212man
Report is here: https://assets.publishing.service.go...-CPS_01-20.pdf

Hard to imagine how severe their injuries were if they hit the ground from 4 ft going backwards!
it does say minor injuries..
twinstar_ca is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2024, 19:45
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,372
Received 381 Likes on 219 Posts
Originally Posted by twinstar_ca
it does say minor injuries..
Yes and they exited unaided.
212man is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2024, 22:06
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,386
Received 734 Likes on 331 Posts
Poor maintenance protocols in a maritime environment - sounds pretty standard for the Caribbean
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2024, 13:01
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Devon
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 212man
Report is here: https://assets.publishing.service.go...-CPS_01-20.pdf

Hard to imagine how severe their injuries were if they hit the ground from 4 ft going backwards!
Thanks for the report 212man. The seat are a crash collapsable type I believe. Wonder what the claim states about the injuries.

Did the pilot, and pc start flying again in the new aircraft? The AAIB Report states that the pilot in command was 58 in 2019, so he may have now retired due to age?

Can't see they reason for the claim, as the AAIB report states in its CONCLUSION that the failure was due to corrosion by salt moisture,

https://assets.publishing.service.go...-CPS_01-20.pdf

Last edited by Cabby; 4th Jun 2024 at 13:12.
Cabby is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2024, 14:03
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,372
Received 381 Likes on 219 Posts
Originally Posted by Cabby
Thanks for the report 212man. The seat are a crash collapsable type I believe. Wonder what the claim states about the injuries.

Did the pilot, and pc start flying again in the new aircraft? The AAIB Report states that the pilot in command was 58 in 2019, so he may have now retired due to age?

Can't see they reason for the claim, as the AAIB report states in its CONCLUSION that the failure was due to corrosion by salt moisture,

https://assets.publishing.service.go...-CPS_01-20.pdf
The report says "minor injuries", and the AAIB do not actually define what that means in their online documentation. But, from their definition of 'serious', it is clear that anything other is really not that big a deal. They don't even discuss the nature of the injuries further in the report, so it's really quite curious......
212man is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 4th Jun 2024, 17:56
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 69
Posts: 4,532
Received 293 Likes on 143 Posts
You can sue for damn near anything - the hard part is actually recovering money - enough money to make it worthwhile while paying all the legal fees.
So, did Airbus pay anything?
On this side of the pond, we have a big issue with frivolous lawsuits - unless the defendant can win a summary judgement, it's often cheaper for the insurance to settle than to go to court and pay all the lawyer fees (which of course what the people filing the frivolous lawsuits are hoping for).
tdracer is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 6th Jun 2024, 14:49
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Devon
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Police said no injuries.

Press coverage including pictures taken on the day of the bounce with the crew inspecting the damage. Police stated there were no injuries!

https://www.caymancompass.com/2019/0...uring-takeoff/


More news regarding the payout to the RCIP to partly cover the cost of a new aircraft.

https://caymannewsservice.com/2022/0...er-oria-crash/
Cabby is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2024, 14:57
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Devon
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Court documents

Noticed in the press link on the last post there is court page link. If the pilot was injured, how did continue flying in the EC145 new aircraft?

This is the court document.
https://judicial.ky/court_search/#

Enter the applicant name (shown in the press coverage) in the Keyword box. Case G2022-0048

Last edited by Cabby; 7th Jun 2024 at 08:28. Reason: Applicant
Cabby is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2024, 08:49
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: UK
Age: 74
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Questions:
2 of the 3 crew members filed the claim a long time after the bumpy landing? Did they go to hospital? What was the outcome of the financial claim?
Beafer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.