Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

AB 206 issues

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

AB 206 issues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Jun 2024, 17:50
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South of UK
Posts: 525
Received 24 Likes on 19 Posts
I would struggle to believe that anyone owning a Bell machine would ever have had Agusta parts fitted to their machine, it was always a no no.

But someone will prove me wrong!
206 jock is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 18th Jun 2024, 08:53
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: England
Posts: 1,464
Received 34 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by 206 jock
I would struggle to believe that anyone owning a Bell machine would ever have had Agusta parts fitted to their machine, it was always a no no.

But someone will prove me wrong!
Spares shortages especially blades in the 1980's lead to a lot of aircraft receiving blades that were available regardless of origin.
The authorities have tightened up considerably since then
Also to be considered is that in some parts of the world the rules are a little lax.
Example being a Bell 206 that had an extension granted to timex main rotor TT straps by a certain African airworthiness authority.
Same aircraft which was Bell built had Agusta main blades.

Last edited by ericferret; 18th Jun 2024 at 09:12.
ericferret is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.