Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Pilot shortage grounds Westpac (Lismore) rescue chopper

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Pilot shortage grounds Westpac (Lismore) rescue chopper

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Nov 2011, 11:10
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 465
Received 52 Likes on 23 Posts
Pilot shortage grounds Westpac (Lismore) rescue chopper

Shortage grounds chopper | Lismore News | Local News in Lismore | Northern Star

A PILOT shortage grounded the Westpac Rescue Life Saver Helicopter on Friday while a tourist needed rescuing at Whian Whian Falls, Dunoon.

A back-up helicopter from the Gold Coast was sent to the rescue instead, however by the time that helicopter arrived, the Canadian man, who had back flipped off the falls and collided with another swimmer, had received CPR and regained consciousness and was transferred by road ambulance to Lismore Base Hospital.

Friday's pilot shortage is the second time the Westpac Life Saver Helicopter has been grounded in the past month after a pilot resigned last month with no replacement expected for two weeks said chief crewperson Roger Fry.

"We've been operating on a three-pilot roster system since mid-October," Mr Fry said.

Under that roster, pilots work 48 hours straight, living and sleeping on base, then have 48 hours leave, then are on call for the next 48 hours Mr Fry said.

"We normally have a four-pilot roster, so there is the potential for fatigue limitations with the three-pilot roster," he said.

"On Friday one of those three pilots was ill and because of fatigue issues we did not have another pilot on standby," he said.

When the Lismore helicopter is unavailable, using a rescue service from either Tamworth or south-east Queensland could add 20-35 minutes to the response time, depending on the location of the emergency, Mr Fry said.

"It's not an ideal situation," he said.

Finding a properly-trained replacement pilot was a top priority for the service.

"At the end of the day it comes down to funding," Mr Fry said.

The special training of a pilot to the level needed can cost as much as $100,000 before wages are even applied Mr Fry said.

Having four pilots was the optimum situation Mr Fry said; however with additional funding the service would welcome having six pilots in the team.

"We would like to work towards having four pilots and a chief and deputy pilot permanently stationed here," he said.

"Extra funding would assist us and we are looking at increasing our crew to six."
havick is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2011, 19:01
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: WA
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
shake a tree
Gymble is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2011, 02:04
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: lake district
Age: 49
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
where do i sign up???
stringfellow is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2011, 02:57
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: australia
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it seems to me over the years that there is just about a permanent advertisement in the friday australian for pilots at lismore base.

you could perhaps conclude that pilots use the facility for the free specialised training they get, ($100,000.???) with no intention of staying for any length of time. maybe they should have default contracts to at least recoup their hard to get funding from this possibility.
deeper is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2011, 06:01
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 465
Received 52 Likes on 23 Posts
One thing I have never quite understood (and I'm happy to be corrected here) is why the govt puts in any funding for community resuce helicopters whatsoever. ie are there any KPI's or damages attached to the funding should the community rescue helicopter not be able to deliver?

I'm all for the establishment of rescue bases, but the govt is getting a free ride from not for profit organisations. If there is a proven need for a rescue base somewhere, why not have it fully funded to a contract operator (not for profit or commercial company alike) with all the KPI's, damages etc that go with it? That way the end user (community/public) doesn't suffer in instances mentioned in the above news article.
havick is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2011, 14:15
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 208
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One thing I have never quite understood (and I'm happy to be corrected here) is why the govt puts in any funding for community resuce helicopters whatsoever. ie are there any KPI's or damages attached to the funding should the community rescue helicopter not be able to deliver?
I actually think that there are "KPIs" attached for community providers on governement contracts. For instance (in QLD, and I also stand to be corrected) each year, a certain amount of days are allowed for down time (maintenance, fatigue et al) and if that is exceeded money is deducted from the contracted amount - not that much to start with!

Do the government rescue guys have KPIs

So far as the government getting a free ride from community providers I tend to agree somewhat. The government does get very good value for money (a twin IFR machine with NVG these days) so why would you pay big bucks for a service when you can get a service which is just as capable for a fraction of the cost? I don't agree but thats the way it is. So far as establishing a need for a service, it is often the community providers that take a bight of the poo sandwich and go it alone in order to prove the need for a service (I use TWB as example which has turned out to be one of the busiest bases around) - what commercial operator would do that for nothing?

Anyway, my two bobs.

Turkey
Turkeyslapper is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2011, 07:43
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Beside the seaside
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An excellent two bobs worth Turkeyslapper. IMHO Australia has the best HEMS network in the world. Multi-role, winch equipped, IFR, 24 hour, NVG, GNSS approaches at hospitals, well-equipped modern, medium sized machines with well-trained and motivated crews and a balance of State and individual/corporate sponsorship. Works very well.

The other two ends of the spectrum seem to be USA where competing hospitals operate single-engine VFR machines which seem to regularly fly into hillsides at night trying to maintain VMC and UK where very few HEMS operators can actually fly on NVG, IFR or even at night, no GNSS hopital approaches with very little state assistance or corporate sponsorship. But they do have military Seakings and Coastguard S-92's flying single patient hospital transfers!

Last edited by Epiphany; 24th Nov 2011 at 10:05.
Epiphany is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.