Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Modular route into the North Sea

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Modular route into the North Sea

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Oct 2007, 09:05
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,372
Received 381 Likes on 219 Posts
B73, I agree in theory you don't need the credits for the MPH type (caused me a bit of puzzlement when I saw that!) but I guess from a practical viewpoint you don't want to be getting stuck into the books after a couple of years, to sit the ATPL exams, for the licence itself once you have the hours.

Edited to add, Dump the Pole, you will need the MCC for your first MPH type, regardless of licence or whether you are a captain or not.
212man is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2007, 09:16
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agreed, I assumed that this would be the first multicrew ME type anyway for B73.

Also, don't forget that the ATPL theory will expire after three years if you don't get your IR in this time. (Covered in other threads many times)

DTP
Dump the pole is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2007, 15:50
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,968
Received 29 Likes on 17 Posts
Thanks 212 and DTP,

I knew what the regs are... It just didn't sound like Fred did.

And thanks for the heads up re requirements, DTP. I've been telling newbies on multiple occasions on previous threads that you need the ATPLs if you want to be a multi-pilot captain (at some point in the future.) And it looks like that was a wrong assumption on your part - the quoted requirement wasn't for my benefit!
Bravo73 is online now  
Old 23rd Oct 2007, 16:22
  #24 (permalink)  
FredFri
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Have you got a LASORS or JAA FCL reference, Fred?
Actually I only looked at the JAR-FCL (Amendment 6, I know Lasors is slightly different, maybe Lasors 2008?) and instead of stating :

" c. i. for a VFR type rating have completed the
course and passed the examination in
accordance with JAR-FCL 2.160 (a) and (b);
or
ii. for a type rating including IR(H) privileges hold
a CPL(H) and IR(H) or meet the requirements
of JAR-FCL 2.285 and hold an IR(H).
"

it only says :

"(3) meet the requirements of JAR-FCL
2.285 as applicable for ATPL(H)
"
(ie Atpl theory)


And also it depends (once again!!) on the State issuing your licence.
Lasors is only for UK, some european countries have implemented the FCL2 in its latest version.
(I appreciate this doesn't apply to 99% of the readers of this thread)
 
Old 23rd Oct 2007, 16:42
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,968
Received 29 Likes on 17 Posts
OMG. There goes off another Amendment 6 'grenade'.

Sorry for doubting you, Fred. You obviously know the new regs far better than me!
Bravo73 is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.