Has JAR FCL2 made flying safer?
Thread Starter
This report only seems to refer to aeroplanes and JAR FCL-1.
Maybe the conclusion would be similar for helicopters, but the report doesn't seem to refer to helicopters at all.
V.
Maybe the conclusion would be similar for helicopters, but the report doesn't seem to refer to helicopters at all.
V.
NO only boring......at least the training part,all the paper and documents and bla bla bla bulls**t. aircrafts dont fly on paper....
but dont get me wrong flying is still fun
but dont get me wrong flying is still fun
Guest
Posts: n/a
Well far be it for me to defend the JAA, but there are some fairly serious holes in that paper, most obviously the lack of any tests of statistical significance. The one vaguely interesting finding (that recency related accidents dropped by 40% over the intro of JAR) is glibly dismissed in the conclusions without any statistical analysis.
As the paper itself points out the purpose of JAR was harmonisation not safety.
As the paper itself points out the purpose of JAR was harmonisation not safety.
