Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

SKY news 1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Jan 2007, 10:23
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Before you all incur the wrath of Mr Smith, who is getting mightily pissed-off with the comments in this forum because they all seem to be associated with a company in Redhill against which he has a current legal action, you might want to swallow your plegm.

There have been claims from the operator of this aircraft that they were able do fly into dark whilst filming the whale in London last year. There is no way the reporter can be considered as aircraft crew.
Yes - it did fly in the dark. Legal. And there never was a reporter onboard.

The reporter could never be classed as required crew. The aircraft therefore must of had floats on the aircraft as well as lifejackets, liferaft and survival suits at this time of year.
Of course a reporter isn't crew. But passengers can be carried under Aerial Work. Operating above a TRA to 2000ft within one mile of the shore with the R44 glide ratio means that the aircraft can easily make land. Why would you want to burden your flight safety with heavy unnecessary equipment. This wreck does not qualify as offshore.


It might be a good idea if, during the next tea break at Redhill, you all sit down and read the rules of Aerial Work. Not as they apply to an AOC operator - because every flight conducted by an AOC holder has to be PT unless all onboard are employed by that AOC holder. Read the rules as they apply to GA.

For Lawd's Sake, if you have an issue with what they are doing, ring him up. Not hard to find! Don't post inaccurate ramblings here. You're making an industry look like a kids' playground.

Last edited by JimBall; 30th Jan 2007 at 10:34.
JimBall is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2007, 13:10
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Surrey
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Um, 'fraid I'm not Redhill. Thank you for your kind advice Jim - next time I'm in Redhill I'll make time for a cup of tea with the operators there and find out they make of it all.
plus expenses is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2007, 16:19
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry Jim, it must have been someone else's Robinson that I saw on the telly appearing stationary at not very many feet with the coast clearly visible a long way off. Oh, and the reporter on his presenter cam describing the scene whilst 'hovering over the sea'.
dunnarunna is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2007, 18:55
  #24 (permalink)  
puntosaurus
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Of course a reporter isn't crew. But passengers can be carried under Aerial Work. Operating above a TRA to 2000ft within one mile of the shore with the R44 glide ratio means that the aircraft can easily make land. Why would you want to burden your flight safety with heavy unnecessary equipment. This wreck does not qualify as offshore.
Go on, help us out, how can that be ? Here's the CAA's summary of the meaning of public transport
 
Old 30th Jan 2007, 19:04
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: the right seat
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Never trust a CAA document that ends on "page 8 of 7".....
rattle is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.