Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Caspian Sea Helicopters

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Caspian Sea Helicopters

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Mar 2006, 12:57
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Avon, CT, USA
Age: 68
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Caspian Sea Helicopters

What kind of license do you need to fly say in the Baku, Caspian Sea area? JAA, FAA or something else. Would "N" registered aircraft be able to work over there?
Who control aviations, is it the Russian equivalent of the CAA/FAA?
Thanks.
ATPMBA is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2006, 23:28
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,372
Received 381 Likes on 219 Posts
I don't think the Russians have anything to do with it: you must have an old atlas! Baku is in Azerbajan. Other operations in the region are in Kazakstan and Turkmenistan. I would assume that the aircraft would be locally registered and the crews flying either on validations or locally issued licences on the strength of their FAA/JAA/CASA etc licences. Quite apart from any local requirements to do this, the operators of G reg a/c would prefer to get them off the G reg in order to use 'overseas' operating practices, rather than be bound by UK rules. I'm thinking of Flight Time and Duty limits, weather minimums etc.
212man is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2006, 08:05
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The gulag
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
212 Man.

You left out PACs

NC43
nutcracker43 is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2006, 12:10
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,315
Received 585 Likes on 242 Posts
Why might this be?

212man,

Quite apart from any local requirements to do this, the operators of G reg a/c would prefer to get them off the G reg in order to use 'overseas' operating practices, rather than be bound by UK rules. I'm thinking of Flight Time and Duty limits, weather minimums etc.
Why is that ol' buddy?

Are you saying the UK rules are onerous and interfere with one making a living? I should think with all the suggestions the UK rules promote safety, the oil companies would embrace the UK standard around the world.

Why are the G-registered...thereby meaning the UK operators so quick to ditch their home grown set of rules whenever possible?
SASless is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2006, 00:43
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,372
Received 381 Likes on 219 Posts
NC43, not sure what a PAC is other than a Power Assurance Check?

SASless, Onerous is in the eye of the beholder.
212man is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2006, 01:17
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,315
Received 585 Likes on 242 Posts
212man,

You suggested ditching the "G" registration was amongst the first priorities of operators when working overseas. Why is that in your view?
SASless is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2006, 01:41
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,372
Received 381 Likes on 219 Posts
I'm not sure where the "first priority" bit came from; I was merely suggesting that they would prefer it.

Ignoring any other constraints or considerations, it is obviously more administratively demanding to operate an a/c within the jurisdiction of two separate, and probably far from harmonised, national authorities. Operating on a local registration and AOC etc means a single authority to report to.

Looking outside of that consideration, if an authority allows pilots to operate to less restrictive FTL schemes, then generally speaking that means you need less pilots. You don't need a double degree in rocket science and brain surgery to work out the benefits of that (and many other alleviations)!
212man is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2006, 01:51
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Age: 75
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is probable that even UK operators in London would drop the G reg if they could....
NickLappos is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2006, 02:19
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ATPMBA

Back to the original question. Unless you speak Russian and Azeri and have a close relative in the Aviation Ministry, the chances of you getting an Azeri license are exactly zero.

The other route would be to contact CHC Global Ops in Vancouver. Unfortunately, because it is one of our better bases, you will have to do about ten years in Africa before you might get to Baku.
Perro Rojo is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2006, 07:26
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The gulag
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
212Man

PACs are indeed as you describe them. I appreciatete you were not on 212s in the UK but was there not a difference between the figures used in Nigerian and those used in the UK?

Have a wonderful tour there, see the caves and climb the mountain.

NC43
nutcracker43 is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2006, 15:15
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The machines used by the company I work for in Kazakhstan are G- registered.
Taff In Exile is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2006, 00:49
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Avon, CT, USA
Age: 68
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Guys, it sounds like I’ll have to find and marry a Russian wife!
The sacrifices I do for aviation!
ATPMBA is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.