The Inertial Guidance System
Guest
Posts: n/a
The Inertial Guidance System
The Inertial Guidance System.
Substitute Helicopter for Aircraft if this is too confusing.
The aircraft knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it
knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or
where it isn't from where it is (whichever is the greater), it obtains a
difference, or deviation.
The Inertial Guidance System uses deviations to generate error signal
commands which instruct the aircraft to move from a position where it is
to a position where it isn't, arriving at a position where it wasn't, or
now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position where
it wasn't; thus, it follows logically that the position where it was is
the position where it isn't.
In the event that the position where the aircraft now is, is not the
position where it wasn't, the Inertial Guidance System has acquired a
variation. Variations are caused by external factors, the discussions of
which are beyond the scope of this report.
A variation is the difference between where the aircraft is and where the
aircraft wasn't. If the variation is considered to be a factor of
significant magnitude, a correction may be applied by the use of the
autopilot system. However, use of this correction requires that the
aircraft now knows where it was because the variation has modified some of
the information which the aircraft has, so it is sure where it isn't.
Nevertheless, the aircraft is sure where it isn't (within reason) and it
knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it
isn't, where it ought to be from where it wasn't (or vice versa) and
integrates the difference with the product of where it shouldn't be and
where it was; thus obtaining the difference between its deviation and its
variation, which is variable constant called "error".
Merry Christmas
------------------
The Cat
IP: Logged
------------------
The Cat
Substitute Helicopter for Aircraft if this is too confusing.
The aircraft knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it
knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or
where it isn't from where it is (whichever is the greater), it obtains a
difference, or deviation.
The Inertial Guidance System uses deviations to generate error signal
commands which instruct the aircraft to move from a position where it is
to a position where it isn't, arriving at a position where it wasn't, or
now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position where
it wasn't; thus, it follows logically that the position where it was is
the position where it isn't.
In the event that the position where the aircraft now is, is not the
position where it wasn't, the Inertial Guidance System has acquired a
variation. Variations are caused by external factors, the discussions of
which are beyond the scope of this report.
A variation is the difference between where the aircraft is and where the
aircraft wasn't. If the variation is considered to be a factor of
significant magnitude, a correction may be applied by the use of the
autopilot system. However, use of this correction requires that the
aircraft now knows where it was because the variation has modified some of
the information which the aircraft has, so it is sure where it isn't.
Nevertheless, the aircraft is sure where it isn't (within reason) and it
knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it
isn't, where it ought to be from where it wasn't (or vice versa) and
integrates the difference with the product of where it shouldn't be and
where it was; thus obtaining the difference between its deviation and its
variation, which is variable constant called "error".
Merry Christmas
------------------
The Cat
IP: Logged
------------------
The Cat
Guest
Posts: n/a
Ah, explains why I've seen the odd report of a Pilot landing at the wrong airfield. They must have one of these gadgets (gotta have them all, you know. Latest version only, please!)
So presumably the guy who landed at Southampton last year (UK, South coast) when he thought it was Oxford (NW of London, and not a ship in sight...) had a new gadget based on these principles, and had to leave the manual behind as, presumably, that would put him above Max Weight, so mistook variation for deviation, and made an error as a result.
So presumably the guy who landed at Southampton last year (UK, South coast) when he thought it was Oxford (NW of London, and not a ship in sight...) had a new gadget based on these principles, and had to leave the manual behind as, presumably, that would put him above Max Weight, so mistook variation for deviation, and made an error as a result.
