U.S. Airlines and the "seatbelt sign"
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
U.S. Airlines and the "seatbelt sign"
Apart from liability reasons is there any reason U.S. airlines are so "anal" about their seatbelt signs. Slightest turbulence and there it comes. Not switched off till you reach cruise altitude.
I've flown several European/Asian carriers with excellent safety records and they seem to have a more rational approach to the "seatbelt sign."
Any thoughts?
I've flown several European/Asian carriers with excellent safety records and they seem to have a more rational approach to the "seatbelt sign."
Any thoughts?
![shon7 is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fairly close to the colonial capitol
Age: 56
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Apart from liability reasons
It is also why when there is an incident aboard an air carrier in the US - everybody sits tight until a thorough asessment takes place and why Mcdonalds will warn you of HOT (surprise !) coffee when served.
In the world of instant news, a bloodied/on-a-stretcher/otherwise injured passenger is bad publicity too.
They've tried to enact tort reform - but the trial lawyers have a strong lobby group.
![vapilot2004 is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Murica.
Age: 45
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have flown quite a bit between St. Maarten and JFK with American, and on most flights the seatbelt signs are never turned off at all. And passengers are walking around, the cabin crew is encouraging people to not group around the lavs, but not a single word about the lit seat belt sign.
You have to wonder, what is the use?
You have to wonder, what is the use?
![TIMTS is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
"If flight attendants do not enforce, there is no reason for them to be in the cabin at all"
Incorrect. Most people comply with flight and cabin crew orders. That a small but noticeable percentage doesn't mean they are not doing the job. I don't want a FA physically taking down 26B because they went to the lav when the seat belt sign was on. That's the difference between an enforcer and an informer.
Incorrect. Most people comply with flight and cabin crew orders. That a small but noticeable percentage doesn't mean they are not doing the job. I don't want a FA physically taking down 26B because they went to the lav when the seat belt sign was on. That's the difference between an enforcer and an informer.
![West Coast is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
PPRuNe supporter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's the difference between an enforcer and an informer.
![Dream Land is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
chaos...drama queen???
"sad watching the chaos while jump seating on the US carriers"
I work for a US carrier, and have been pushed back to reserve. In addition I commute. As such I see far more than most airline pilots as far as what happens in the back. I do not see chaos. If you see chaos in people not complying with seat belt signs then I would like to see what you consider an emergency. Knee getting clipped by the drink cart as it passes?
I work for a US carrier, and have been pushed back to reserve. In addition I commute. As such I see far more than most airline pilots as far as what happens in the back. I do not see chaos. If you see chaos in people not complying with seat belt signs then I would like to see what you consider an emergency. Knee getting clipped by the drink cart as it passes?
![West Coast is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Enforcing the law in the cabin does not necessarily mean getting physical.
If you are at that point things are already out of hand. It means using a flight attendants training, experience and assertiveness to keep order in the cabin.
There are seat back safety cards and videos to inform. Enforcement is necessary sometimes, that is certainly, (especially since 9-11) part of the cabin crews duty, or, as I said earlier, thay should not be back there.
Not obeying a seat belt sign by itself would not be a reason for anyone to get physical!
If you are at that point things are already out of hand. It means using a flight attendants training, experience and assertiveness to keep order in the cabin.
There are seat back safety cards and videos to inform. Enforcement is necessary sometimes, that is certainly, (especially since 9-11) part of the cabin crews duty, or, as I said earlier, thay should not be back there.
Not obeying a seat belt sign by itself would not be a reason for anyone to get physical!
Last edited by stilton; 8th May 2006 at 04:11.
![stilton is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
PPRuNe supporter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What would you suggest the FA's do ?
![Dream Land is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Murica.
Age: 45
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
violators.....
What are we as violators to do on a 4hr+ flight, with food and drinks served right after takeoff, when the seatbelt sign is NEVER turned off?
I am sure more passengers would respect the sign if it was used a bit better.
I am sure more passengers would respect the sign if it was used a bit better.
![TIMTS is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)