OAT Going up the spout!?!
One word: ENRON. 'Nuff said?
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I converted Australian to UK ATPL at OATS. The ground instructors fitted into 2 groups; exceptionally good and exceptionally bad. Our Air Law man kept comming in with different piles of paper, although usually not enough for everyone and would tell us to ignore what he had given us previously as it contained errors. OK fair enough, but this happened 4 TIMES. The Principles of Flight instructor knew little of the subject, example being his absolute conviction that turn radius was proportional to IAS not TAS is but one of the examples I can remember. The remainder of the instructors were very good, particularly our Met man.
I can't comment on the flying side as I left at this point. My reason for doing so was OATS attitude that I should hang about and fit in when they could do something with me, so off to Bristol and GFT & CPL/IR all done in 2-3 weeks(req trg to standard & test), not bad for December.
At the time it struck me that they really were'nt set up for short/modular courses and as a result they did'nt do themselves or us the students justice. If I had to do again(perish the thought) OATS would'nt be my choice.
I believe their cadet product is good and yes I do hope they continue to remain in business.
I can't comment on the flying side as I left at this point. My reason for doing so was OATS attitude that I should hang about and fit in when they could do something with me, so off to Bristol and GFT & CPL/IR all done in 2-3 weeks(req trg to standard & test), not bad for December.
At the time it struck me that they really were'nt set up for short/modular courses and as a result they did'nt do themselves or us the students justice. If I had to do again(perish the thought) OATS would'nt be my choice.
I believe their cadet product is good and yes I do hope they continue to remain in business.
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Red Feather Club
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
JUST A NOTE TO ALL THOSE OUT THERE THAT ARE IN THAT ARE CONCERNED OVER THE FINANCIAL SITUATION AT YET ANOTHER UK TRAINING ORGANIZATION.I AM WAY BEHIND CURRENT NEWS ONLY LEARNING OF SFT'S DEMISE ONLY 1 WEEK AGO.
ALL I CAN SAY TO THOSE THINKING OF TRAINING IS DONT PUT TOO MUCH DOSH UP FRONT AND DO IT BY CREDIT CARD IF YOU ARE ENTERING INTO FLYING TRAINING, STUFF THAT YOU ALREADY KNOW NO DOUBT?
I KNOW THAT IT WONT HELP THOSE WHO ARE IN THE CURRENT SITUATION WHERE YOU MAY HAVE LOST MONEY, WHAT CAN ANYBODY SAY BUT SORRY TO HEAR IT?
PERSONALLY I CONSIDER MYSELF LUCKY TO HAVE GONE THROUGH THE SYSTEM IN 1998-99 AND WAS VERY PRIVILAGED TO BE AMOUNST THE LAST TO BENIFIT FROM NVQ'S.
IT WAS MY GRIPE THEN AS IT IS NOW THAT THE INDUSTRY HAS ITSELF TO BLAME FOR LOSING OUT ON A GREAT SCHEME THAT BENIFITED BOTH STUDENT AND SCHOOL ALIKE, BUT WAS BLATENTLY EXPLOITED BY SOME OF THE CROOKS WHO RUN FLIGHT TRAINING IN THE UK...AND I DO NOT NECESSARILY INCLUDE PROPER TRAINING ORGANIZATIONS LIKE OATS, SFT AND SO ON.
WHAT ALWAYS GOT MY GOAT WAS THE FACT THAT MANY OF THE SMALLER SCHOOLS JUMPED ON THE BANDWAGON AND WERE OFFERING NVQ'S ON PPL'S, I BELEIVE, EVEN HOURS BUILDING OUTSIDE THIS COUNTRY....AND NOBODY BOTHERED TO SIGN OFF ANY OF THE MODULES IN THE TRAINING MANUALS THAT WERE TO BE SIGNED OFF.
SO HOW IN THE HELL WAS THE DEPT TRADE AND INDUSTRY SUPPOSED TO ASSES HOW WELL THE SCHEME WAS DOING IF THERE WAS NOBODY IN THE INDUSTRY WILLING TO AT LEAST SIGN OFF THE LOG BOOKS?
NVQ'S SHOULD HAVE ONLY BEEN AVIALABLE TO BONEAFIDE STUDENTS ON RECOGNISED COURSES THAT TRUELY COUNTED TOWARDS A PROFESSIONAL LICENCE....PEOPLE LIKE YOURSELVES WHO NOW HAVE TO PAY HIGHER PRICES FOR A PROFESSIONAL LICENCE.
ALL I CAN SAY TO THOSE OF YOU OUT THERE IS KEEP AT IT, CHOOSE CAREFULLY, LISTEN TO THE ADVICE OF SOME OF THOSE WHO HAVE TREAD THE PATH BEFORE YOU AS THEY MADE THE SAME MISTAKES ALONG THE WAY...EVEN WHEN THE ECONOMIC CLIMATE WAS IN BETTER SHAPE MAJOR TRAINING ORGANIZATIONS WENT UNDER.
ITS A CUT THROAT WORLD AND AT TIMES AND A CUT THROAT INDUSTRY, TESTOMONY TO THE FACT THAT THERE IS FEWER AND FEWER SCHOOLS IN THE UK TO CHOOSE FROM, NO MATTER WHAT THE REASON FOR THEM GOING BUST OR RELOCATING.
ALL I CAN SAY IS ITS NOT ROSY OUT HERE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE TRAINING FENCE, BUT AT LEAST I HAVE A JOB AT THE MOMENT THAT IS ABOUT THE BEST WAY IN THE WORLD AT PAYING A MORTGAGE.
AT SOME TIME THINGS WILL IMPROVE AND YOU NEED TO BE THERE READY FOR WHEN IT DOES.
AND WHEN YOU DO FINALLY GET THERE ALL THE BULL**** IS WORTH IT IF YOU TRUELY LOVE FLYING.....BEST OF LUCK EVERYBODY
Jet Blast Rat
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sarfend-on-Sea
Age: 51
Posts: 2,081
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WWW is quite right. Idle, uninformed speculation, with which this thread started and has largely continued can only be damaging to OATS and to the industry. It is extremely unfair to post harmful rumours with no real information to support an inflammatory headline.
Credit cards are not necessarily the best way to protect your money. If you are putting money up front, ask the school about setting up an escrow account. Those who had money in one with SFT did not lose out significantly. This not only is good protection but saves you the 3-5% premium most schools will charge on credit card payments (over £1500 on an OATS course!)
Credit cards are not necessarily the best way to protect your money. If you are putting money up front, ask the school about setting up an escrow account. Those who had money in one with SFT did not lose out significantly. This not only is good protection but saves you the 3-5% premium most schools will charge on credit card payments (over £1500 on an OATS course!)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Wales
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rolling Circle speaks I believe with some authotity. Only 2 weeks ago OATS were hotly defending themselves on this forum, and this very debate, where are they now?
WWW OATS can't go down?
WWW OATS can't go down?
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well it defeats the purpose of these forums if everyone who doesn't have any idea, accuses someone who does have an idea of causing Idle, uninformed speculation. Let the people who know have their say !
Heaven forbid someone should blaspheme by even suggesting that OAT are in trouble!!
Heaven forbid someone should blaspheme by even suggesting that OAT are in trouble!!
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Greater London
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Facts:
On Friday Oxford Aviation Training announced to staff all over the world that there would be 18 redundancies.
None of these redundancies involve Flight Instructors as they are still short of FI's for work that is definitely being done until mid-2002. However after that.......
OAT not going bust yet......
You get it wrong sometimes WWW.
On Friday Oxford Aviation Training announced to staff all over the world that there would be 18 redundancies.
None of these redundancies involve Flight Instructors as they are still short of FI's for work that is definitely being done until mid-2002. However after that.......
OAT not going bust yet......
You get it wrong sometimes WWW.
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think perhaps that now is the time for OAT to really start worrying - after all, look what happened to the last school that Send Clowns sought to defend!
Let's get things in perspective:-
OAT is still (just) the best FTO in the JAA, this is solely because it has attracted the best instructors, both ground and flight.
However, the current senior management is doing its best to alienate all of its best assets. It appoints an excellent IFR Manager who makes the fatal mistake of telling it like it is. This is not what the (aviation illiterate) senior management wants to hear and so said IFR Manager is moved sideways (lawsuit pending). senior management appoint an only slightly less competent IFR Manager who quickly realises that everything his predecessor warned of was, in fact, true. IFR Manager (2) then makes the same fatal mistake of revealing this fact to senior management - the result (not surprisingly) is that IFR Manager (2) gets the boot (decides that, for the good of his family.....etc.)
So, now we have the situation where IFR training at OAT is being run by a Head of Training and VFR Manager, neither of whom hold a valid IR - and this is supposed to be the premier FTO????
At this point the CAA arrive ( for what they are worth). At the annual inspection, OAT's approval is renewed, but only for three months. Marigold passes this off as due to 'administrative problems'. My spies tell me, however, that the main criticism was that OAT suffered from 'a fundamental breakdown of supervision' (i.e. The management were crap!).
Result - all OAT instructors with any competence are actively seeking employment elsewhere. Of course, now is not a good time but, nevertheless, many are finding decent jobs. OAT is surviving on the reputation of a workforce that is rapidly disappearing and it is only a matter of time before the industry realises that it is paying top dollar for a second rate product. Thereafter BBA, whose core business is FBO and jet maintenance, will quickly realise that OAT is nothing more than a useless drain on its resources and will pull the plug.
What WWW, and others, fail to realise is that BBA, unlike BAe, has no inherrent interest in flight training. Their purchase of CSE Aviation had everything to do with CSE Sales and Engineering and nothing at all to do with OAT. One has only to look at the way Kidlington is being developed to understand the priorities of BBA - and it ain't flight training!!
Let's get things in perspective:-
OAT is still (just) the best FTO in the JAA, this is solely because it has attracted the best instructors, both ground and flight.
However, the current senior management is doing its best to alienate all of its best assets. It appoints an excellent IFR Manager who makes the fatal mistake of telling it like it is. This is not what the (aviation illiterate) senior management wants to hear and so said IFR Manager is moved sideways (lawsuit pending). senior management appoint an only slightly less competent IFR Manager who quickly realises that everything his predecessor warned of was, in fact, true. IFR Manager (2) then makes the same fatal mistake of revealing this fact to senior management - the result (not surprisingly) is that IFR Manager (2) gets the boot (decides that, for the good of his family.....etc.)
So, now we have the situation where IFR training at OAT is being run by a Head of Training and VFR Manager, neither of whom hold a valid IR - and this is supposed to be the premier FTO????
At this point the CAA arrive ( for what they are worth). At the annual inspection, OAT's approval is renewed, but only for three months. Marigold passes this off as due to 'administrative problems'. My spies tell me, however, that the main criticism was that OAT suffered from 'a fundamental breakdown of supervision' (i.e. The management were crap!).
Result - all OAT instructors with any competence are actively seeking employment elsewhere. Of course, now is not a good time but, nevertheless, many are finding decent jobs. OAT is surviving on the reputation of a workforce that is rapidly disappearing and it is only a matter of time before the industry realises that it is paying top dollar for a second rate product. Thereafter BBA, whose core business is FBO and jet maintenance, will quickly realise that OAT is nothing more than a useless drain on its resources and will pull the plug.
What WWW, and others, fail to realise is that BBA, unlike BAe, has no inherrent interest in flight training. Their purchase of CSE Aviation had everything to do with CSE Sales and Engineering and nothing at all to do with OAT. One has only to look at the way Kidlington is being developed to understand the priorities of BBA - and it ain't flight training!!
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
rolling circle - seems you have your finger on the pulse.
send clowns- find a single modular student who doesn't fully agree with my 1st post and I'll eat my words.
I just hope BBA read this forum as closely as OATS do.
send clowns- find a single modular student who doesn't fully agree with my 1st post and I'll eat my words.
I just hope BBA read this forum as closely as OATS do.
RC - take your point on the future plans of OATS current owners but I see that as a seperate issue to the immediate one raised on this thread.
I think it spurious to argue that becuase OATS are laying off some staff that they are going bust. Frankly is the weren't I would be more worries. BA Lufthansa and Air France are laying off huge numbers but nobody argues that they are going bust. Its merely the sensible thing to do in a downturn.
Self sponsored courses moaning that airline cadet courses are getting better treatment are nothing new. It will always be this way because the airline cadets are a block and you are but one person. Also there is a pragmatic reality that a school HAS to graduate an airline course on time because they have a very expensive type rating booked for the week after. Whereas the self sponsored guy will merely be in the process of sending out the first wave of his CV + covering letters. Who would you give priority to. No really. Who? The guys with a £19,000 course that HAS to start 3 weeks on Monday or to the other guys who won't even get their licenses back from the CAA for three weeks...
Its not fair but if you don't like it you should have gone to Multiflight/PAT/Bristol/Ravenair/Tayflight ot any of the other excellent smaller commercial FTO's who have no cadets to worry about. You paid your money and made your choice and partly no doubt you thought you were buying a better product because you used the same shop as BA/AL/BM/AIH et al... Well maybe not eh?
I am no OATS lover - I have slagged them in the past and for years people taunted me that I was bitter becuase I could not afford to go there. But I don't think its fair or reasonable to have a major thread running about them going bankrupt. I just do not see it - as I said before I will only think there is a problem when they drop the prices in a bid to generate cashflow. IF that happens then a LOT of other FTO's are going to be in trouble as they will lose customers hand over fist.
Time will tell.
Personally I think the best school is in Jerez but then I am biased
Good luck,
WWW
I think it spurious to argue that becuase OATS are laying off some staff that they are going bust. Frankly is the weren't I would be more worries. BA Lufthansa and Air France are laying off huge numbers but nobody argues that they are going bust. Its merely the sensible thing to do in a downturn.
Self sponsored courses moaning that airline cadet courses are getting better treatment are nothing new. It will always be this way because the airline cadets are a block and you are but one person. Also there is a pragmatic reality that a school HAS to graduate an airline course on time because they have a very expensive type rating booked for the week after. Whereas the self sponsored guy will merely be in the process of sending out the first wave of his CV + covering letters. Who would you give priority to. No really. Who? The guys with a £19,000 course that HAS to start 3 weeks on Monday or to the other guys who won't even get their licenses back from the CAA for three weeks...
Its not fair but if you don't like it you should have gone to Multiflight/PAT/Bristol/Ravenair/Tayflight ot any of the other excellent smaller commercial FTO's who have no cadets to worry about. You paid your money and made your choice and partly no doubt you thought you were buying a better product because you used the same shop as BA/AL/BM/AIH et al... Well maybe not eh?
I am no OATS lover - I have slagged them in the past and for years people taunted me that I was bitter becuase I could not afford to go there. But I don't think its fair or reasonable to have a major thread running about them going bankrupt. I just do not see it - as I said before I will only think there is a problem when they drop the prices in a bid to generate cashflow. IF that happens then a LOT of other FTO's are going to be in trouble as they will lose customers hand over fist.
Time will tell.
Personally I think the best school is in Jerez but then I am biased
Good luck,
WWW
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: HAZEBROUCK_FRANCE
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WWW.
Sorry but Air France is not laying off anybody. They have just stop to recruit and are not replacing retiring people. The cadet scheme is delayed by few months and is slowed down.
Sorry but Air France is not laying off anybody. They have just stop to recruit and are not replacing retiring people. The cadet scheme is delayed by few months and is slowed down.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: No longer on Pprune
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WWW,
My info is that as with AF, the same applies to BA.
One thing that concerns me about all this is that I get the feeling from some quaters that being big implies a certain degree of security. 'xyz' is part of a multi billion pound company and cannot go under, frankly does not cut the mustard in the current climate. As someone has already mentioned, think ENRON. Worlds fourth largest company?
Business does not give a stuff where or who pays, but rest assured if it does not return a profit in the very near future, it will be closed down. Thats life.
I don't agree with idle speculation, however, I would caution anyone suggesting that any company, specialy ones in the iffy aviation training market at present, cannot close it's doors.
PS
My info is that as with AF, the same applies to BA.
One thing that concerns me about all this is that I get the feeling from some quaters that being big implies a certain degree of security. 'xyz' is part of a multi billion pound company and cannot go under, frankly does not cut the mustard in the current climate. As someone has already mentioned, think ENRON. Worlds fourth largest company?
Business does not give a stuff where or who pays, but rest assured if it does not return a profit in the very near future, it will be closed down. Thats life.
I don't agree with idle speculation, however, I would caution anyone suggesting that any company, specialy ones in the iffy aviation training market at present, cannot close it's doors.
PS
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: A PC!
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The following companies are/were all big and are/were now in trouble:
SABENA
Enron
British Leyland
BCCI bank
Barings Bank
Pan American Airways
etc.etc.etc.
Being big does not mean you are safe - it may just mean that your organisation is clumsy and slow to react to change or indeed just highly exposed to market forces.
I don't know if OATS are in trouble (but I would be surprised if they are not hurting) but it is a pretty fair bet that the real estate ax Kidlington is worth more than the business OPATS can bring in.
I hope they do not go down (I don't expect they will) - but it is not impossible. I do, however, expect them to suffer for a while as we all are doing at present.
SABENA
Enron
British Leyland
BCCI bank
Barings Bank
Pan American Airways
etc.etc.etc.
Being big does not mean you are safe - it may just mean that your organisation is clumsy and slow to react to change or indeed just highly exposed to market forces.
I don't know if OATS are in trouble (but I would be surprised if they are not hurting) but it is a pretty fair bet that the real estate ax Kidlington is worth more than the business OPATS can bring in.
I hope they do not go down (I don't expect they will) - but it is not impossible. I do, however, expect them to suffer for a while as we all are doing at present.
Hmm, upon checking I find that Air France are not making any redundancies. Which is odd as they are loosing 17 aircraft but then I suppose things are different in the rigid union ridden socialst nightmare that is the French employment sector.
BA are sacking 12.5% of their workforce. KLM are loosing thousands of staff, Aer Lingus looking for 6000 redundancies. So use those big three instead.
I fail to see exactly what this thread is saying now. It is mostly idle speculation against OATS. For that reason I am closing it.
And don't anybody accuse ME of all people of being an OATS lover!
WWW
BA are sacking 12.5% of their workforce. KLM are loosing thousands of staff, Aer Lingus looking for 6000 redundancies. So use those big three instead.
I fail to see exactly what this thread is saying now. It is mostly idle speculation against OATS. For that reason I am closing it.
And don't anybody accuse ME of all people of being an OATS lover!
WWW
