US Verses Uk
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Southampton
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
US Verses Uk
Hi Guys and Girls as a fledgling wannabee I see a lot in the mags re training in the US is the FAA to CAA convertion straightforward otherwise with cost etc why would anyone trai in the UK apart from the humour aspect.
I am told with the increase in passenger levels predicted over the next 10 years now is a good time to get into commercial avaition and fulfill a lifetime ambition as I am now 33
Any gen most welcome
Ade
I am told with the increase in passenger levels predicted over the next 10 years now is a good time to get into commercial avaition and fulfill a lifetime ambition as I am now 33
Any gen most welcome
Ade
Jet Blast Rat
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sarfend-on-Sea
Age: 51
Posts: 2,081
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Caveat: I work for a UK FTO.
The original JARs did not contain any method of conversion of licences. This was clearly ridiculous, because experienced pilots having worked in the USA or internationally on an ICAO licence had to do the same 55 (or 50) hour course as people who had never flown under IFRs. So for the benefit of such pilots, experienced in IFR flight the 15-hour abridged course was determined as a minimum conversion.
It was never intended as a conversion for people who had trained for an IR elsewhere but never used the rating, never flown instrument sectors on a regular basis. Thus the course is highly unlikely to be a minimum if you do this. I know people who have ended up spending more in total than they would have done in a whole UK course, including one who while a European national had been instructing stateside, using FAA CPL/IR but still decided to book the entire 50-hour course.
Keep this in mind when making your choices; try to talk to some people who have completed each route.
Good luck, however you manage it!
The original JARs did not contain any method of conversion of licences. This was clearly ridiculous, because experienced pilots having worked in the USA or internationally on an ICAO licence had to do the same 55 (or 50) hour course as people who had never flown under IFRs. So for the benefit of such pilots, experienced in IFR flight the 15-hour abridged course was determined as a minimum conversion.
It was never intended as a conversion for people who had trained for an IR elsewhere but never used the rating, never flown instrument sectors on a regular basis. Thus the course is highly unlikely to be a minimum if you do this. I know people who have ended up spending more in total than they would have done in a whole UK course, including one who while a European national had been instructing stateside, using FAA CPL/IR but still decided to book the entire 50-hour course.
Keep this in mind when making your choices; try to talk to some people who have completed each route.
Good luck, however you manage it!
