Sennica 3 Vs Piper Pa44 Seminole.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: dublin/ireland
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sennica 3 Vs Piper Pa44 Seminole.
Hi guys,
This post is aimed at you guy's who unlike me already have twin time . Im shortly about to do my twin rating and have the option between the Sennica & seminole . What would you recommend and why ? Thanks and happy flying !
This post is aimed at you guy's who unlike me already have twin time . Im shortly about to do my twin rating and have the option between the Sennica & seminole . What would you recommend and why ? Thanks and happy flying !
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have flown them both (well Seneca 2) and prefer the Seneca. It is more powerful and feels more solid. The Seneca 2s and 3s are turbocharged and I think it gives you good experience of operating a more complicated aeroplane.
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Walmington on Sea
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To be honest, I would always go for the cheapest. Just make sure you have a thorough type conversion onto any other twins should you want to fly different models in the future.
ExO
ExO
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: U.K
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They're both nice to fly, the Seneca does have a bigger feel to it and there are certainly more of them around which will make it easier to hire etc in the future, but ultimately go with whichever you take a fancy too. Or the cheapest!
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you're intending to do an Instrument Rating in the near future, then you might consider which school you are going to use and what aircraft they use. It would probably be better if you do the Multi-Engine rating on the same aircraft as you might be using for the Instrument Rating.
Good luck
Nasib
Good luck
Nasib
