Cub conversion
Carbonfibre-based lifeform
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: London
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cub conversion
One of my aviation fantasies on these dark winter evenings is pottering around sunny farm strips in a classic machine of real character.
In particular, a Cub.
I've never flown a taildragger before, so that would be an interesting challenge in its own right.
I have a couple of questions:
1) Is the Cub a good machine to start taildragging on?
2) Any recommendations on schools to go to? I could do it at Redhill (which is handy for me), but I rather like the sound of the Clacton course which combines the Cub convestion with some farm strip flying. Are there any other places which do something similar?
In particular, a Cub.
I've never flown a taildragger before, so that would be an interesting challenge in its own right.
I have a couple of questions:
1) Is the Cub a good machine to start taildragging on?
2) Any recommendations on schools to go to? I could do it at Redhill (which is handy for me), but I rather like the sound of the Clacton course which combines the Cub convestion with some farm strip flying. Are there any other places which do something similar?
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 1,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One of my aviation fantasies on these dark winter evenings is pottering around sunny farm strips in a classic machine of real character
Surprisingly, enough I will say that the Cub family represent a wonderful and forgiving group of aircraft on which to do a tailwheel conversion, but with enough 'bite' to keep you on your toes.
I have to be polite about Austers because I am merely tolerated in my cub at my home base by a large brigade of unwashed Auster pilots, however...
Austers are noisier, less reliable (with the Gipsy or Cirrus), more maintenance hungry, much thirstier of fuel and oil and trickier to land.
Choose the Cub. Isn't there one at Old Sarum?
QDM
BTW, the heater is very good and one of the joys of cub flying is being up on fine winter days too.
QDMx3 I know you expect this:
My 100hp Auster is as frugal with fuel and oil as my 65hp Cub was more or less and it's 20 mph faster. I can still get into and out of the strips I used when Cubbing as well.
Noisier, most definitely noisier outside but pretty much the same inside. Should be quieter when I eventually get around to fitting the muffler.....
More maintenance hungry in terms of having to adjust the tappets every 25 hours but that's about it.
I haven't really noticed that the Auster is that much harder to land than the Cub. It's a real paint to taxi in a crosswind with no steerable tailwheel though.
I think that Cubs are overpriced and Austers are underpriced (which worked well for me when I swapped my L4 for the Auster
My 100hp Auster is as frugal with fuel and oil as my 65hp Cub was more or less and it's 20 mph faster. I can still get into and out of the strips I used when Cubbing as well.
Noisier, most definitely noisier outside but pretty much the same inside. Should be quieter when I eventually get around to fitting the muffler.....
More maintenance hungry in terms of having to adjust the tappets every 25 hours but that's about it.
I haven't really noticed that the Auster is that much harder to land than the Cub. It's a real paint to taxi in a crosswind with no steerable tailwheel though.
I think that Cubs are overpriced and Austers are underpriced (which worked well for me when I swapped my L4 for the Auster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bristol and Forest of Dean
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rising to the bait...
The Auster is british made but was designed by CG Taylor - the same guy who designed the Cub. It's a beefed up Taylorcraft with a British engine and a silly castoring tailwheel.
Cheeper - I dont think so!
Initial cost may be lower, but those in-line engines cost a fortune to overhaul and gulp fuel and oil.
The vast majority of Austers are on C of A rather than a PFA permit - more expensive
Airframe parts are much more expensive for the Auster.
What you want is a L4 Cub. £15k gets you a genuine warbird on a PFA permit for around £20ph wet. The engine is an icon of light aviation for sweet running and reliability, yet it can be overhauled more cheaply than any certified aero engine.
More importantly, in the summer you can open the door and watch the countryside float by - what could be better than that!
Back to the question... Yes, the Cub would be an ideal aircraft for a tailwheel conversion - It's THE original trainer afterall!
Kingy
(L&S jumped in before me - I was responding to oscar d. L&S's Auster is one of the few on a Permit I think, so not so bad..)
What happened to our Cub and Auster Fly in? perhaps we could settle this thing with a Tug 'o' war or somthing....
Read this and tell me you don't want one...
Kingy
The Auster is british made but was designed by CG Taylor - the same guy who designed the Cub. It's a beefed up Taylorcraft with a British engine and a silly castoring tailwheel.
Cheeper - I dont think so!
Initial cost may be lower, but those in-line engines cost a fortune to overhaul and gulp fuel and oil.
The vast majority of Austers are on C of A rather than a PFA permit - more expensive
Airframe parts are much more expensive for the Auster.
What you want is a L4 Cub. £15k gets you a genuine warbird on a PFA permit for around £20ph wet. The engine is an icon of light aviation for sweet running and reliability, yet it can be overhauled more cheaply than any certified aero engine.
More importantly, in the summer you can open the door and watch the countryside float by - what could be better than that!
Back to the question... Yes, the Cub would be an ideal aircraft for a tailwheel conversion - It's THE original trainer afterall!
Kingy
(L&S jumped in before me - I was responding to oscar d. L&S's Auster is one of the few on a Permit I think, so not so bad..)
What happened to our Cub and Auster Fly in? perhaps we could settle this thing with a Tug 'o' war or somthing....
Read this and tell me you don't want one...
Kingy
Last edited by Kingy; 4th Feb 2003 at 21:03.
High Flying Bird
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Old Sarum ish
Posts: 2,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nah... you should do the conversion in a chipmunk! 
If you want to do a farmstrip course, but not at Clacton, it's worth asking around FIs, as some will be more than willing to do one unofficially. It's something I intend to do eventually with my chipmunk instructor, either in the chippie or a C152, or both. I have heard the Clacton course is great, but at the moment it's not practical for me to get there. And I have no money.
If you want to do a farmstrip course, but not at Clacton, it's worth asking around FIs, as some will be more than willing to do one unofficially. It's something I intend to do eventually with my chipmunk instructor, either in the chippie or a C152, or both. I have heard the Clacton course is great, but at the moment it's not practical for me to get there. And I have no money.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Only flown an Auster once and found the landings not as difficult as I had anticipated but still prefer the Cub by a fair margin.
I prefer the tandem seating as it is such good fun when flying low-n-slow.
Love the ability to open the door when it is warm or just want to show off.
Admire the handling so much better than the Auster.
They fetch premium prices and once you have flown one you know just why.
I recently have flown quite a bit on a Citabria and have to say that this is even easier to handle compared to the Cub and apart from the door issue is just as much fun as the Cub. (You can take the door off of course but then cant take it with you)
Ah roll on those summer evenings!
FD
When is this Auster-Cub fly in? (Just seen that Aerbabe has posted to this thread as well! Yes Chippy is good fun too but still not as nice as Cub)
I prefer the tandem seating as it is such good fun when flying low-n-slow.
Love the ability to open the door when it is warm or just want to show off.
Admire the handling so much better than the Auster.
They fetch premium prices and once you have flown one you know just why.
I recently have flown quite a bit on a Citabria and have to say that this is even easier to handle compared to the Cub and apart from the door issue is just as much fun as the Cub. (You can take the door off of course but then cant take it with you)
Ah roll on those summer evenings!
FD
When is this Auster-Cub fly in? (Just seen that Aerbabe has posted to this thread as well! Yes Chippy is good fun too but still not as nice as Cub)
Carbonfibre-based lifeform
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: London
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for that link Kingy.
I loved the quote:
That's exactly the kind of thing I had in mind - real flying! 
I loved the quote:
It's entirely possible to land in a wind which is too high to taxi in. In that case, keep the nose into the wind and wait for help to walk you in. More than one pilot has had to coast past the hangars at fifty feet with the door open and the throttle back while yelling for help before landing.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Over the hedge... just!
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Haven't I read all this Auster V Cub stuff before ?
The bottom line is you will have more chance being able to hire a Cub than an Auster.
Be aware the J3 Cub is a bit different from the 150 Super Cub.
But do it, old taildraggers are the biz.
CC
The bottom line is you will have more chance being able to hire a Cub than an Auster.
Be aware the J3 Cub is a bit different from the 150 Super Cub.
But do it, old taildraggers are the biz.
CC
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: back at the grind stone
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok so I though I would stick up for the lovely Auster... But did'nt mean to throw the topic off.
Realistically. Unless you want to travel all the way to Wickenby to sample the delights of an Auster. Then you will likely end up on a cub. I have heard some very, very good things about Clacton Aero club. 'Great Fun', 'Very Freindly' and even 'Value for Money'.
But as someone said. They use super cubs (Pa18-150). These are a bit different from the £ 15 K J3/L4 machines you might buy.
Just don't do what a someone I know done. He just went for the nearest / cheapest and ended up doing it in a tailwheel Cessna 150. !. Why oh Why.
Realistically. Unless you want to travel all the way to Wickenby to sample the delights of an Auster. Then you will likely end up on a cub. I have heard some very, very good things about Clacton Aero club. 'Great Fun', 'Very Freindly' and even 'Value for Money'.
But as someone said. They use super cubs (Pa18-150). These are a bit different from the £ 15 K J3/L4 machines you might buy.
Just don't do what a someone I know done. He just went for the nearest / cheapest and ended up doing it in a tailwheel Cessna 150. !. Why oh Why.
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The latest issue of 'AOPA' mag has an article on the Chippy by David Ogilvy. He votes it the best handling production light aeroplane of all time. Having flown one for over 20 years, as well as very many other light aircraft, I wouldn't argue with that.
The Yak52 has amazing performance and razor-sharp controls - but it somehow isn't as 'nice' as the Chippy.
The L4 Cub is great fun for all the reasons mentioned in this thread - I loved the one I used to fly.
I would say the Super Cub lacks the 'fun factor' of the L4, as does the Citabria. The Tiger Moth is awful, except that it's an open-cockpit biplane so has loads of character; the Stampe is what the Tiger should have been but isn't. Never flown an Auster.
But for sheer delight in handling - the Chippy wins every time. IMHO, of course ;~)
SSD
The Yak52 has amazing performance and razor-sharp controls - but it somehow isn't as 'nice' as the Chippy.
The L4 Cub is great fun for all the reasons mentioned in this thread - I loved the one I used to fly.
I would say the Super Cub lacks the 'fun factor' of the L4, as does the Citabria. The Tiger Moth is awful, except that it's an open-cockpit biplane so has loads of character; the Stampe is what the Tiger should have been but isn't. Never flown an Auster.
But for sheer delight in handling - the Chippy wins every time. IMHO, of course ;~)
SSD
Last edited by Shaggy Sheep Driver; 4th Feb 2003 at 15:18.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OD
I am sure that the person you know is grateful that you did not mention any names.
The taildragger version of the 150 truly has to be the biggest d@g I have ever flown.
The instructor at the club that was operating it at the time told me beforehand that I would not enjoy it.
Stubborn as I am I wanted to try it anyway.
He was right. Awful.
Out of all the tailwheel aircraft I have flown the worst by far.
FD
(MHO of course
)
I am sure that the person you know is grateful that you did not mention any names.
The taildragger version of the 150 truly has to be the biggest d@g I have ever flown.
The instructor at the club that was operating it at the time told me beforehand that I would not enjoy it.
Stubborn as I am I wanted to try it anyway.
He was right. Awful.
Out of all the tailwheel aircraft I have flown the worst by far.
FD
(MHO of course
)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Deepest Warwickshire
Age: 47
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Been on the Clacton course. Thoroughly recommend it. It's a good introduction to tailwheel flying. Tuition is "cheap" at around £90/hr on the Cub. Accommodation is around £12/night if you stay at the airfield manager's B&B.
Farmstrip course is probably the best 2-3 hours flying you'll spend.
There's something extremely sadistic about hurtling towards a farmer's hedge at 60 knots and hopping over it...
Farmstrip course is probably the best 2-3 hours flying you'll spend.
There's something extremely sadistic about hurtling towards a farmer's hedge at 60 knots and hopping over it...
Kingy my Auster is on a C of A I'm afraid. Practically speaking it doesn't make a whole lot of difference as most of the maintenance on both my Cub (PFA) and the Auster is done by a friendly engineer. I do the not-so-technical stuff which is inspected and signed off (this is legal by the way) and he does the nitty gritty stuff. This is partly why I haven't seen any real difference between operating a Cub and a 100hp Auster (the 130/145hp Gipsy engined ones would be more on a par with a 150hp Supercub).
The Cub, as much as I loved it, didn't feel as "solid" as the Auster. I also wanted to take my 4 year old daughter flying and side-by-side is better for this than a tandem layout.
I've never flown a SuperCub so I can't comment on them. However, as Oscar Deuce pointed out, you are far more likely to end up on a SuperCub cos there are far more of them.
The Cub, as much as I loved it, didn't feel as "solid" as the Auster. I also wanted to take my 4 year old daughter flying and side-by-side is better for this than a tandem layout.
I've never flown a SuperCub so I can't comment on them. However, as Oscar Deuce pointed out, you are far more likely to end up on a SuperCub cos there are far more of them.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bristol and Forest of Dean
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Low'n'Slow
I can see that if you have an engineer doing all the maintenance the cost advantage of having a PFA permit is much reduced.
To those of us who like 'having a go' at things mechanical however, the permit system is brilliant. Last year we TOHed an A65 and we have just finished a VW 1834 overhaul for the FRED, - all under the watchful eye of an inspector I might add, it's been very rewarding.
I had assumed the Auster was on a permit as it's a small one. I must add that the extra 'solid' feeling of an Auster comes at a price... My Taylorcraft BC12 manages the same 20MPH advantage over the Cub with the same engine!
I have flown a Super Cub and was disappointed, I didn’t like the flaps and thought the controls seemed a little 'dumbed down'. As for soloing from the front seat... couldn’t get used to that!
I would love to have a go in your little Auster though, as it's the one I'd want (but on a permit) out of the Auster family. Fancy trading rides?
Kingy
I can see that if you have an engineer doing all the maintenance the cost advantage of having a PFA permit is much reduced.
To those of us who like 'having a go' at things mechanical however, the permit system is brilliant. Last year we TOHed an A65 and we have just finished a VW 1834 overhaul for the FRED, - all under the watchful eye of an inspector I might add, it's been very rewarding.
I had assumed the Auster was on a permit as it's a small one. I must add that the extra 'solid' feeling of an Auster comes at a price... My Taylorcraft BC12 manages the same 20MPH advantage over the Cub with the same engine!
I have flown a Super Cub and was disappointed, I didn’t like the flaps and thought the controls seemed a little 'dumbed down'. As for soloing from the front seat... couldn’t get used to that!
I would love to have a go in your little Auster though, as it's the one I'd want (but on a permit) out of the Auster family. Fancy trading rides?
Kingy
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SSD,
I've never seen a British copy in person, but from photos of RAF versions of the DHC-1 it appears that they have a rather clunky-looking canopy rather than the beautiful original (Canadian) model. Is that correct? Any ideas why?
Cheers,
MLS-12D
I've never seen a British copy in person, but from photos of RAF versions of the DHC-1 it appears that they have a rather clunky-looking canopy rather than the beautiful original (Canadian) model. Is that correct? Any ideas why?
Cheers,
MLS-12D
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Teddington, Middlesex
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MLS-12D: the bubble canopy fitted to the Canadian DHC-1 is very pretty, isn't it (we published a very nice Gordon Bain photograph of a yellow RCAF Chippie, sat amid a field of buttercups, in the February issue of General Aviation SSD was referring to).
My understanding was that the RAF and MoS were concerned that escape from an inverted, bubble-canopy Chipmunk would be very difficult. The British 'glasshouse' design had jettisonable side panels that allowed the occupants to wriggle out, even if the canopy was jammed. (There might have been some other concern that venting the sliding hood thus would allow it to be forced open at high airspeed - I am less sure about that.)
In civilian operation, those jettisonable panels can be a menace. After small boys had accidently - or even deliberately - released them through 'pulling the wrong handle', they were wired shut in the example I used to fly from Booker. Of course, when someone else had a wing-shedding accident in the thing, they had a job getting out of the updside-down fuselage...
My understanding was that the RAF and MoS were concerned that escape from an inverted, bubble-canopy Chipmunk would be very difficult. The British 'glasshouse' design had jettisonable side panels that allowed the occupants to wriggle out, even if the canopy was jammed. (There might have been some other concern that venting the sliding hood thus would allow it to be forced open at high airspeed - I am less sure about that.)
In civilian operation, those jettisonable panels can be a menace. After small boys had accidently - or even deliberately - released them through 'pulling the wrong handle', they were wired shut in the example I used to fly from Booker. Of course, when someone else had a wing-shedding accident in the thing, they had a job getting out of the updside-down fuselage...
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Of course, when someone else had a wing-shedding accident in the thing, they had a job getting out of the updside-down fuselage...
Eeek! I didn't know a Chippy had ever suffered mid-air failure, PW. Any details??
The side windows of the Chippy's canopy are wired shut to prevent inadvertant use, but in an emergency the wire is broken by rotating the release lever. The window then drops out and some pilots slimmer than me can crawl out through it - it's for use if the aeroplane ends up inverted on the ground, or if the canopy jams for any reason.
The airflow around the Chipmunk canopy tends to hold it shut in flight (as anyone who has tried to open it for photography or fresh air will know!). To aid rapid opening at speed for a parachute departure (not an option in our aeroplane - we dont have them) pulling a toggle in the roof flips up a 'spade' into the airflow to help slide the canopy back on the rails.
SSD
Eeek! I didn't know a Chippy had ever suffered mid-air failure, PW. Any details??
The side windows of the Chippy's canopy are wired shut to prevent inadvertant use, but in an emergency the wire is broken by rotating the release lever. The window then drops out and some pilots slimmer than me can crawl out through it - it's for use if the aeroplane ends up inverted on the ground, or if the canopy jams for any reason.
The airflow around the Chipmunk canopy tends to hold it shut in flight (as anyone who has tried to open it for photography or fresh air will know!). To aid rapid opening at speed for a parachute departure (not an option in our aeroplane - we dont have them) pulling a toggle in the roof flips up a 'spade' into the airflow to help slide the canopy back on the rails.
SSD
Kingy I'd love to trade rides especially in the aircraft that spawned the Auster.
Point taken about the extra 35hp needed by the Auster to maintain pace with the Taylorcraft
Unfortunately very few Austers are on a Permit. The CAA seems to be moving towards the Permit system being purely for kit built aircraft now. As I understand it (I may be wrong, I've been wrong many times before ) one cannot import a Cub, Jodel etc and put it on a PFA Permit now. 
Point taken about the extra 35hp needed by the Auster to maintain pace with the Taylorcraft
Unfortunately very few Austers are on a Permit. The CAA seems to be moving towards the Permit system being purely for kit built aircraft now. As I understand it (I may be wrong, I've been wrong many times before
) one cannot import a Cub, Jodel etc and put it on a PFA Permit now.