NOTAM site 'upgrade'
PPruNaholic!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Buckinghamshire
Age: 61
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
G'day rustle, looks pretty much the same..? What am I missing? Are you referring to the new FAQ's? Still a bit slow...
But on the positive side, I reiterate my previous comments and confirm that having used it a few times in anger I now feel I am able to get what I need from it using the Narrow route briefing... its probably not as bad as it seemed at first!
But on the positive side, I reiterate my previous comments and confirm that having used it a few times in anger I now feel I am able to get what I need from it using the Narrow route briefing... its probably not as bad as it seemed at first!
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Coventry, England
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why not lat / long
Hello Rustle,
In your excellent article about your visit to AIS, you said that NATS were concerned that if they listed them lat/long then pilots would only look at the lat/long that they were flying in.
Errr - at great risk of sounding foolish - isn't that the whole point of listing them lat/long?
I suppose that means that graphical representations are equally bad as you are only likely to look where you are flying.
I must be missing something here...
(Not having a pop at you - just would like to understand this better)
In your excellent article about your visit to AIS, you said that NATS were concerned that if they listed them lat/long then pilots would only look at the lat/long that they were flying in.
Errr - at great risk of sounding foolish - isn't that the whole point of listing them lat/long?
I suppose that means that graphical representations are equally bad as you are only likely to look where you are flying.
I must be missing something here...
(Not having a pop at you - just would like to understand this better)
Guest
Posts: n/a
I think what most of us would like is a "feed" of the information to be made available to others. This would allow people to get Notampro and other similar programs working.
The basic operation of the "new" AIS site is text based. It is very similar to the sort of stuff supplied with the early IBM PC's back in 1982/83. NATS are not programmers, and boy does it show. If they concentrated on getting the info out and left others to make it understandable all our problems would go away in a mater of weeks. Nats would then not have the CAA hitting them over the head, and would not have to invest hundreds of thousands of pounds on trying to catch up on the last 20 years of Graphical User Interfaces and colour maps indicating exactly what we need to know in next to no time.
The frustrating thing is it was all available, virtually free of charge. With a tiny amount of planning they could have arranged for the feed to coincide with the new site and we could have carried on using our favourite programs as if nothing had happened. Such a feed, by the way, could be entirely automatic, and would cost next to nothing to set up.
Rod1
The basic operation of the "new" AIS site is text based. It is very similar to the sort of stuff supplied with the early IBM PC's back in 1982/83. NATS are not programmers, and boy does it show. If they concentrated on getting the info out and left others to make it understandable all our problems would go away in a mater of weeks. Nats would then not have the CAA hitting them over the head, and would not have to invest hundreds of thousands of pounds on trying to catch up on the last 20 years of Graphical User Interfaces and colour maps indicating exactly what we need to know in next to no time.
The frustrating thing is it was all available, virtually free of charge. With a tiny amount of planning they could have arranged for the feed to coincide with the new site and we could have carried on using our favourite programs as if nothing had happened. Such a feed, by the way, could be entirely automatic, and would cost next to nothing to set up.
Rod1
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Savannah GA & Portsmouth UK
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Another AIS Visit 3 Oct
Having stuck my head above the parapet once too often I have now been invited like Russell to visit AIS at Heathrow on 3 Oct.
I have been corresponding with Russell to co-ordinate our approach.
I am a 200+ Hr PPL flying a Luscombe out of Popham, the avionics of which consist of a single COM. Just the sort of person who might wander where he shouldn't and at whom NOTAM are aimed.
I have a certain amount of knowledge of databases, web design and quality systems and am preparing a list of discussion points which currently include:-
The need for a printable area bulletin that can be put up on a notice board and used by a pilot at an airfield. It needs to be organised in such a way that you don't need a computer to extract the information.
The desirability of making the raw data available in a form that allow third party developers to produce products like NotamPlot. At the moment what you get from the AIS site is not NOTAM, it is an edited form of the raw NOTAM data arranged into a pre-flight information bulletin (PIB)
Improvements to the layout and data provided in a PIB.
Improvements to the website, including speed, usability and availability
If you have particular points to do with the above that you want raised, or if you have additional issues please raise them here or email me at [email protected]
I will report back after the meeting.
Mike
I have been corresponding with Russell to co-ordinate our approach.
I am a 200+ Hr PPL flying a Luscombe out of Popham, the avionics of which consist of a single COM. Just the sort of person who might wander where he shouldn't and at whom NOTAM are aimed.
I have a certain amount of knowledge of databases, web design and quality systems and am preparing a list of discussion points which currently include:-
The need for a printable area bulletin that can be put up on a notice board and used by a pilot at an airfield. It needs to be organised in such a way that you don't need a computer to extract the information.
The desirability of making the raw data available in a form that allow third party developers to produce products like NotamPlot. At the moment what you get from the AIS site is not NOTAM, it is an edited form of the raw NOTAM data arranged into a pre-flight information bulletin (PIB)
Improvements to the layout and data provided in a PIB.
Improvements to the website, including speed, usability and availability
If you have particular points to do with the above that you want raised, or if you have additional issues please raise them here or email me at [email protected]
I will report back after the meeting.
Mike
A change to the cumbersome selection of aerodrome/waypoints etc
The current to-ing & fro-ing between different pages is a pain in the @rse! Why not a drop down list based on the characters present? Micro$oft manage it quite well with their help menu.
Also, why only ICAO codes? Why not IATA or full name? Travel websites manage to cope with it.
Damned if I know every bloody ICAO code used in the UK, consdering the less than intuitive assigments. Give me Oz or (better) USA...
The current to-ing & fro-ing between different pages is a pain in the @rse! Why not a drop down list based on the characters present? Micro$oft manage it quite well with their help menu.
Also, why only ICAO codes? Why not IATA or full name? Travel websites manage to cope with it.
Damned if I know every bloody ICAO code used in the UK, consdering the less than intuitive assigments. Give me Oz or (better) USA...
Why do it if it's not fun?
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 4,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Personally, I'd be quite happy with a list of NOTAMs organised by latitude.
(Hmm, now where have we seen that before???)
I quite often go for short local flights, trying to keep away from airfields. Or I'll be going to another airfield via a dog-leg to avoid London, or a danger area, or similar. The only two ways I can think of getting the information I need for that kind of flight easily is either graphically, or sorted geographically. Currently, it takes over an hour - compared to about 5 minutes with the old system (and that was without using NotamPlot).
FFF
-----------
(Hmm, now where have we seen that before???)
I quite often go for short local flights, trying to keep away from airfields. Or I'll be going to another airfield via a dog-leg to avoid London, or a danger area, or similar. The only two ways I can think of getting the information I need for that kind of flight easily is either graphically, or sorted geographically. Currently, it takes over an hour - compared to about 5 minutes with the old system (and that was without using NotamPlot).
FFF
-----------
PPruNaholic!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Buckinghamshire
Age: 61
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Godd on ya mrcross. Here's a bug for you then: In "handbook" (why is it called that!?) I am unable to "update" a plan... when I try I get the following error message:
But all the fields are properly filled in, and it works fine in "use" mode...
Error received from server Anais
Oops! Your request cannot be completed. The server ANAIS got the following error.
Please return to the previous page using the back button on your browser and ensure that the following fields are properly entered and re-submit the form.
(E0733) DURATION FILTER: FORBIDDEN ERROR : LINE 1 COL 16
Oops! Your request cannot be completed. The server ANAIS got the following error.
Please return to the previous page using the back button on your browser and ensure that the following fields are properly entered and re-submit the form.
(E0733) DURATION FILTER: FORBIDDEN ERROR : LINE 1 COL 16
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Savannah GA & Portsmouth UK
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Meeting with AIS
Thanks Andy, I've verified it and added it to the list.
I've also suggested to them that most people regard a Handbook as a User Guide and suggested that they call it "My Briefings" or "Saved Briefings". They need to sort out the drop-down control on the page which obscures the dropdowns from the NavBar, they also need to stop it from saving everything. Currently if you re-use a briefing it will update the date and save it as a new briefing. They also need to give you the option of deleting a briefing you no longer need.
It's not one of their better efforts at page design.
Thanks also FlyingForFun
When I said you needed to be able to extract the information without the need for a computer your point was exactly what I had in mind. We need at least two sections in the briefing, one by geographical location, probably in the old south-north order and another to cover those items which have a wider effect, e.g. the fact that a particular FIS frequency might be unavailable.
All on the list for Thursday
Mike
Hi Tinstaafl
Agreed, the lookup is very poor.
Bear in mind that there's a list of the codes for all licensed airfields on the 500,000 ICAO chart. It's in brackets after the airfield name in the frequency list. Probably quicker to look up.
For anyone having difficulty with decoding the abbreviations they are listed in GEN2-2 of the UK AIP and can be found at http://www.ais.org.uk/aes/pubs/aip/pdf/gen/10202.PDF (you'll need Adobe Acrobat Reader)
Mike
I've also suggested to them that most people regard a Handbook as a User Guide and suggested that they call it "My Briefings" or "Saved Briefings". They need to sort out the drop-down control on the page which obscures the dropdowns from the NavBar, they also need to stop it from saving everything. Currently if you re-use a briefing it will update the date and save it as a new briefing. They also need to give you the option of deleting a briefing you no longer need.
It's not one of their better efforts at page design.
Thanks also FlyingForFun
When I said you needed to be able to extract the information without the need for a computer your point was exactly what I had in mind. We need at least two sections in the briefing, one by geographical location, probably in the old south-north order and another to cover those items which have a wider effect, e.g. the fact that a particular FIS frequency might be unavailable.
All on the list for Thursday
Mike
Hi Tinstaafl
Agreed, the lookup is very poor.
Bear in mind that there's a list of the codes for all licensed airfields on the 500,000 ICAO chart. It's in brackets after the airfield name in the frequency list. Probably quicker to look up.
For anyone having difficulty with decoding the abbreviations they are listed in GEN2-2 of the UK AIP and can be found at http://www.ais.org.uk/aes/pubs/aip/pdf/gen/10202.PDF (you'll need Adobe Acrobat Reader)
Mike
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Savannah GA & Portsmouth UK
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ICAO Codes
Hi Tinstaafl
Agreed, the lookup is very poor.
Bear in mind that there's a list of the codes for all licensed airfields on the 500,000 ICAO chart. It's in brackets after the airfield name in the frequency list. Probably quicker to look up.
For anyone having difficulty with decoding the abbreviations they are listed in GEN2-2 of the UK AIP and can be found at http://www.ais.org.uk/aes/pubs/aip/pdf/gen/10202.PDF (you'll need Adobe Acrobat Reader)
Mike
Agreed, the lookup is very poor.
Bear in mind that there's a list of the codes for all licensed airfields on the 500,000 ICAO chart. It's in brackets after the airfield name in the frequency list. Probably quicker to look up.
For anyone having difficulty with decoding the abbreviations they are listed in GEN2-2 of the UK AIP and can be found at http://www.ais.org.uk/aes/pubs/aip/pdf/gen/10202.PDF (you'll need Adobe Acrobat Reader)
Mike
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 1,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
rustle,
I'm a very average private pilot and I find lat / long very confusing and difficult to visualise. Frankly, I tend to switch off when having to figure out which lat / long are relevant to me. It just ends up in a big splurge of unmanageable numbers in my mind.
That's why Notamplot was so brilliant. In this context, therefore, I don't think a graphical representation of data is a 'Nice to have', it's an absolute essential. Many people can cope with sifting through a lengthy list of lat / long. Many, many more can't.
If they're serious about flight safety they will deliver the info to the user in the most easily interpretable fashion, a fashion which even an idiot could interpret, because, let's face it, many pilots are idiots.
So, yes, either concoct a GUI themselves or let notamplot fuction once more. This, I think, is urgent.
QDM
P.S. Look at this useful bit of advice mrcross has just given us to help interpret the ais site:
Helpful though this advice is to the technologically abled few, this proves conclusively that you need to be an obsessive geek to be able to use the site. It's a hopeless mess.
I'm a very average private pilot and I find lat / long very confusing and difficult to visualise. Frankly, I tend to switch off when having to figure out which lat / long are relevant to me. It just ends up in a big splurge of unmanageable numbers in my mind.
That's why Notamplot was so brilliant. In this context, therefore, I don't think a graphical representation of data is a 'Nice to have', it's an absolute essential. Many people can cope with sifting through a lengthy list of lat / long. Many, many more can't.
If they're serious about flight safety they will deliver the info to the user in the most easily interpretable fashion, a fashion which even an idiot could interpret, because, let's face it, many pilots are idiots.
So, yes, either concoct a GUI themselves or let notamplot fuction once more. This, I think, is urgent.
QDM
P.S. Look at this useful bit of advice mrcross has just given us to help interpret the ais site:
For anyone having difficulty with decoding the abbreviations they are listed in GEN2-2 of the UK AIP and can be found at http://www.ais.org.uk/aes/pubs/aip/pdf/gen/10202.PDF (you'll need Adobe Acrobat Reader)
Last edited by QDMQDMQDM; 29th Sep 2002 at 19:48.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Surrey, UK.
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
QDM,
Did you see this bit of my post:
What I meant was what you want:
A1/A8 so you can use NotamPlot today, whilst they or someone else develops a similar thing for "tomorrow"...
Did you see this bit of my post:
QDM, to answer your question more directly, I think if a transition period was to occur that would enable you to use the tool you are comfortable with whilst enabling them (or a.another) to develop new tools you would be comfortable with.
A1/A8 so you can use NotamPlot today, whilst they or someone else develops a similar thing for "tomorrow"...
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 1,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A1/A8 so you can use NotamPlot today, whilst they or someone else develops a similar thing for "tomorrow"...
QDM
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lat/long
I second QDM's "find lat / long very confusing and difficult to visualise".
In the old system, it was OK because I could look at a day's list and see where to limit the region of interest by relation to other places I know. (My gliding club needs nothing south of Croxley Green which always features, and there was usually something further north I could recognise to limit the range. Ditto for east and west limitations.).
Today I got the NOTAms for us, found buried in the rest a rocket event up to 15000 feet at Heckingham - just west of the meridian and south of the 53rd parallel, so I thought it might be in range of gliders from Essex. Turned out it is in Lincolnshire and of no interest to us today.
(They often don't put something more helpful, like a county, in the descriptions. Of course, they do mention "Wales" which is apparently within 50 miles of the "narrow route" I have to use to find East Anglian data, as I pick up NOTAMs in that region of a mil - oops, nearly said what they told me I must not use, copy or pass on. They do give counties where kite flying goes on. If NOTAM originators don't give such data, it's a pity AIS can't fill the gap to help the rest of us - but I suppose it's cost again.)
In the old system, it was OK because I could look at a day's list and see where to limit the region of interest by relation to other places I know. (My gliding club needs nothing south of Croxley Green which always features, and there was usually something further north I could recognise to limit the range. Ditto for east and west limitations.).
Today I got the NOTAms for us, found buried in the rest a rocket event up to 15000 feet at Heckingham - just west of the meridian and south of the 53rd parallel, so I thought it might be in range of gliders from Essex. Turned out it is in Lincolnshire and of no interest to us today.
(They often don't put something more helpful, like a county, in the descriptions. Of course, they do mention "Wales" which is apparently within 50 miles of the "narrow route" I have to use to find East Anglian data, as I pick up NOTAMs in that region of a mil - oops, nearly said what they told me I must not use, copy or pass on. They do give counties where kite flying goes on. If NOTAM originators don't give such data, it's a pity AIS can't fill the gap to help the rest of us - but I suppose it's cost again.)
PPruNaholic!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Buckinghamshire
Age: 61
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Another bug report to pass on...
Hi there,
Just got a narrow (10NM) route briefing for EGUB -> EGMH for this coming Sunday, with route DCT LAM DCT DVR DCT. Output notams included:
Which is approx. 50NM north of track, and so oughtn't to have been included.
Hope this helps,
Just got a narrow (10NM) route briefing for EGUB -> EGMH for this coming Sunday, with route DCT LAM DCT DVR DCT. Output notams included:
NAVW: FROM 02/10/06 10:25 TO 02/10/06 11:05 H4891/02
E) AUS(MIL REF)02-10-0181/3103/DG
MIL FAST JET (1X TORN F3 ACFT)AEROBATIC DISPLAY
WI 5NMS RAD PSN 5231N 00044W (ROCKINGHAM RACE CIRCUIT, NR CORBY,
NORTHANTS).
F)SFC G)6000FT AGL
E) AUS(MIL REF)02-10-0181/3103/DG
MIL FAST JET (1X TORN F3 ACFT)AEROBATIC DISPLAY
WI 5NMS RAD PSN 5231N 00044W (ROCKINGHAM RACE CIRCUIT, NR CORBY,
NORTHANTS).
F)SFC G)6000FT AGL
Which is approx. 50NM north of track, and so oughtn't to have been included.
Hope this helps,
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Savannah GA & Portsmouth UK
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Visit to AIS 3 Oct
Yesterday I spent 5 hours at AIS Heathrow, meeting with the following:-
Steve Harben, Head of Data Management
Phil Bate, Manager UK AIS
Alan Burrill, Manager IS/IT
It is going to take me a little time to write up a full account so please bear with me.
I am certain that the meeting will produce positive results, though as always with these things, not in the timescale that we might like to see.
Mike
Steve Harben, Head of Data Management
Phil Bate, Manager UK AIS
Alan Burrill, Manager IS/IT
It is going to take me a little time to write up a full account so please bear with me.
I am certain that the meeting will produce positive results, though as always with these things, not in the timescale that we might like to see.
Mike
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Savannah GA & Portsmouth UK
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AIS Website Problem
Just spoken with Phil Bate, Manager UK AIS
They are experiencing problems with the web servers. They have not yet been able to determine the cause. One possibility is that it is caused by high utilisation because the new AIRAC cycle has just been published and a lot of people may be trying large downloads of the AIP.
Mike
They are experiencing problems with the web servers. They have not yet been able to determine the cause. One possibility is that it is caused by high utilisation because the new AIRAC cycle has just been published and a lot of people may be trying large downloads of the AIP.
Mike
PPruNaholic!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Buckinghamshire
Age: 61
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Somtimes it pays to select "IFR / VFR"
I found out this afternoon, by accident, that you don't get some categories of aerodrome NOTAM unless you select IFR / VFR. In this case, its of interest also to the VFR pilot...
I plan to fly to Manston (EGMH). I anticipate using the Manston LARS service enroute. When I get my briefing using only "VFR" setting, there is no mention of any problems with Manston's radar service, but when I select IFR/VFR I see:
So I now anticipate no LARS service. Granted, its not cirtical information for VFR flight, but I would suggest that this would be of interest to most VFR users.
Havva great weekend everybody!
I plan to fly to Manston (EGMH). I anticipate using the Manston LARS service enroute. When I get my briefing using only "VFR" setting, there is no mention of any problems with Manston's radar service, but when I select IFR/VFR I see:
AERODROME (DESTINATION) - EGMH (MANSTON):
COM : FROM 02/10/04 09:23 TO 02/10/06 19:00 E1513/0
E)RADAR U/S
COM : FROM 02/10/04 09:23 TO 02/10/06 19:00 E1513/0
E)RADAR U/S
Havva great weekend everybody!
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Savannah GA & Portsmouth UK
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Andy - re the Radar at Manston - it will be because the NOTAM was incorrectly coded in the first place. ICAO Annexe 15 lays down a series of Q Codes for the NOTAM which will determine which type of briefing it appears in. Unfortunately we don't see the Q Codes so we can't see when the originator goofed by putting the wroing ones in.
Following my visit to AIS at Heathrow last Thursday I have been speaking to Russell and also to AIS as well.
Russell and I have set up a website at http://www.telecall.uk.com/ais (sorry about the URL but I nicked some space on our own server) Also apologies for the appearance but it has been knocked up in a hurry.
This will give you a good background to what is going on, together with a list of what the various briefings SHOULD do (as we see it) and known problems. If you come up with problems that we have not identified there are links which will allow you to mail us.
As well as our contacts within AIS I have also made contact with the software vendors in France.
Both AIS and Thales Information Systems are receptive to dealing with the issues. Russel and I will try to collate everything and give them the information that they need in a structured way which helps them to resolve the issues.
I spoke yesterday with Phil Bate, the Manager of UK AIS and we are going to arrange a re-visit to look at the mechanics of producing what we all want. To this end I would be grateful if anyone interested could look at the website and respond with feedback that is structured and relevant.
It won't happen overnight but it seems to be going in the right direction.
Mike
Following my visit to AIS at Heathrow last Thursday I have been speaking to Russell and also to AIS as well.
Russell and I have set up a website at http://www.telecall.uk.com/ais (sorry about the URL but I nicked some space on our own server) Also apologies for the appearance but it has been knocked up in a hurry.
This will give you a good background to what is going on, together with a list of what the various briefings SHOULD do (as we see it) and known problems. If you come up with problems that we have not identified there are links which will allow you to mail us.
As well as our contacts within AIS I have also made contact with the software vendors in France.
Both AIS and Thales Information Systems are receptive to dealing with the issues. Russel and I will try to collate everything and give them the information that they need in a structured way which helps them to resolve the issues.
I spoke yesterday with Phil Bate, the Manager of UK AIS and we are going to arrange a re-visit to look at the mechanics of producing what we all want. To this end I would be grateful if anyone interested could look at the website and respond with feedback that is structured and relevant.
It won't happen overnight but it seems to be going in the right direction.
Mike
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 1,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mike and Russell,
Firstly, thank-you to you two for some unbelievable work. AIS and NATS are fortunate indeed to have you two working as unpaid consultants to sort out their complete and utter screw-up of the design and implementation of this system.
Secondly, at the risk of sounding like a mono-maniac, I think a graphical representation, a la Notamplot, is essential if the bog standard pilot is going to consult Notams. Any news on that front? Do they understand how important this is?
Thanks again, anyway.
QDM
Firstly, thank-you to you two for some unbelievable work. AIS and NATS are fortunate indeed to have you two working as unpaid consultants to sort out their complete and utter screw-up of the design and implementation of this system.
Secondly, at the risk of sounding like a mono-maniac, I think a graphical representation, a la Notamplot, is essential if the bog standard pilot is going to consult Notams. Any news on that front? Do they understand how important this is?
Thanks again, anyway.
QDM