Ac for short field takeoff / ldg
![](/images/avatars/th_banned.gif)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Texas and UK
Age: 66
Posts: 2,886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I flew a C182T for a while with a Horton STOL kit, will take off with two on board in 700 ft from (short) Grass and clear a fifty foot obstruction after a 1000', great low speed handling and even shorter landing.
Only downside is if you are less than 6', the dash is high and difficult to see over on takeoff, but you compensate for that with technique.
With 4 average adults and full tanks it will go up after about 1000' takeoff with 1500' to fifty feet.
All of this is dependant on the pilot using the correct short / soft field takeoff technique. Treat the takeoff on grass in the same way as on tarmac then you might just go through the hedge...
If you want extereme performance get a Pitts!! You have not said what type of flying you want to do, so the question is almost demanding a "how long is the piece of string" type answer.
Only downside is if you are less than 6', the dash is high and difficult to see over on takeoff, but you compensate for that with technique.
With 4 average adults and full tanks it will go up after about 1000' takeoff with 1500' to fifty feet.
All of this is dependant on the pilot using the correct short / soft field takeoff technique. Treat the takeoff on grass in the same way as on tarmac then you might just go through the hedge...
If you want extereme performance get a Pitts!! You have not said what type of flying you want to do, so the question is almost demanding a "how long is the piece of string" type answer.
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are 100's of aircraft which will operate out of 500m. If you want this to actually help give us an idea of what you are going to do with the aircraft and your budget. For example;
Fun aerobatics with limited touring single seat with low operating cost;
Silence Twister
Touring, two up with low operating costs;
Almost any VLA type (probably 30 odd aircraft)
Touring, four up, operating cost no problem;
C182
Touring off rough strip, 4 up, operating cost no problem;
Maule
Rod1
Fun aerobatics with limited touring single seat with low operating cost;
Silence Twister
Touring, two up with low operating costs;
Almost any VLA type (probably 30 odd aircraft)
Touring, four up, operating cost no problem;
C182
Touring off rough strip, 4 up, operating cost no problem;
Maule
Rod1
I've not flown one but the Robin DR 400 seems to get peoples vote as one of the best load lifters which does not hog runway; otherwise a C182.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Godzone
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
N-model 172 with 180hp with a fine prop is your best bang for buck.
182 with O520 or O540 power. (not the O470) expensive compared to 172
Super Cub. Only a 2 seater. Take off and land in less than 50m though. MUST be hangared.
Piper Pacer.
C180 - not too bad but a 182 performs better overall I reckon
Yak 18T?
182 with O520 or O540 power. (not the O470) expensive compared to 172
Super Cub. Only a 2 seater. Take off and land in less than 50m though. MUST be hangared.
Piper Pacer.
C180 - not too bad but a 182 performs better overall I reckon
Yak 18T?
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: suffolk
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As per all the previous posts, there are hundreds that will do it, and that's just counting regular types without getting into exotic types.
The question is too general.
If you are seeking proper advice ,you need to be much more specific.
The question is too general.
If you are seeking proper advice ,you need to be much more specific.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oxford
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've not flown one but the Robin DR 400 seems to get peoples vote as one of the best load lifters which does not hog runway
Tim
(edited to add - I took the Dauphin into Fenland a couple of weeks ago. The landing was a piece of cake -much shorter than the book figure suggested - the takeoff (one adult, one child, 50% fuel) wasn't. Might have been something to do with the mowing...)
short field
can't beat a helicopter, except for cost