Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Risk of spinning from a sideslip?

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Risk of spinning from a sideslip?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Nov 2009, 16:29
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: France
Posts: 1,033
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I thought it was a K21 but it may have been a Puchacz or a Grob Acro. It was about 25 years ago (with DerekP)
Ah, one of the world's truly great instructors. I suspect it was the Puch or the Grob. A Janus will do this trick, too, and a super falke. I was at Lasham around that time, and got to learn some interesting things from him, including just how far a Janus will glide from 700 feet. I wish I had a Puchacz now, a truly brilliant training aircraft. But I am in France, and the french won't buy anything made abroad if they can help it.
Piper.Classique is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2009, 16:31
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,563
Received 42 Likes on 21 Posts
Puchhaz and Spins

Mention has been made that spinning from a sideslip is just about impossible, but the Puch may be a special case. Certainly it will happily spin out of a co-ordinated turn.

Derek Piggott in, I believe, Going Solo asserts that a glider will not spin or stall from a 45 degree turn because the airflow against the tailplane comes at an angle that does not allow it to generate sufficient downforce to stall the wing.

It takes some muscle, but the Puch does spin from a 45 degree banked turn with two aboard. Remember though that the Puch is aerobatic; so, is designed with more elevator authority than normal gliders.
RatherBeFlying is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2009, 16:33
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Londonish
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by miserlou
Without the addition of power a descent rate would be required to maintain airspeed. In this condition the nose may be lower than in straight and level flight but the datum (flightpath) has changed.
Precisely

As I half suspected, we're not really disagreeing - as much a matter of understanding each other as the subject, which is why arguing on 'tinternet tends to become cyclic & futile

On a slightly related note - if you're flying the decathlon anywhere around the south east (uk) would you mind dropping me an PM..
Mark1234 is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2009, 16:41
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: France
Posts: 1,033
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
It takes some muscle, but the Puch does spin from a 45 degree banked turn with two aboard.
Wellllll.....It depends. On the CG position for a start. Well forward, I don't think it will. Near the aft limit, yes, it will, but without the lines on the canopy you can't really be sure that you have a genuine 45 degree turn. Also you do need to approach the stall rather more briskly than for a normal entry. As you say, it takes some muscle.

As to whether it will spin from a sideslip all I can say is that I never managed it.
Piper.Classique is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2009, 17:56
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Lurking within the psyche of Dave Sawdon
Posts: 772
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Ratherbeflying:
I can personally confirm that the Puchacz, Bulldog, T67A, T67M, Cap10b/c and a variety of others will all spin from a sideslip with only mild abuse. As I said before, it's a perfectly safe, simple and useful manoeuvre if flown correctly.

Piper.classique:
We may know each other. I was an instructor at Lasham on Friday evenings and Saturdays from roughly 1984 to 1994; I also flew the tugs on Wednesday evenings.
Last autumn I spent some time at Gap-Tallard and now see why Brits move to France ... an aviation paradise!

HFD
hugh flung_dung is online now  
Old 24th Nov 2009, 19:08
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: France
Posts: 1,033
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Piper.classique:
We may know each other. I was an instructor at Lasham on Friday evenings and Saturdays from roughly 1984 to 1994; I also flew the tugs on Wednesday evenings.
Yes, I think we do. I was instructing at Lasham at that time, tugging as well. I was working for Threes Counties in 1990 then moved to France.
Piper.Classique is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2009, 21:39
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,166
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
I've learnt not to make very many general comments about spinning. In Australia, spin training approval is type specific and our (my) briefings stress that we're flying a Decathlon (usually for me these days, I have 6 examples to play with) and characteristics of other types may (will, in some types I mention) be different. Examples of some types may even behave differently eg different wing rigging in a Decathlon or a rebuilt leading edge on a Cessna 150.
We routinely sideslip the Decathlons on final so I show instructor trainees what happens if grossly mishandled. Plenty of warning, shaking and rattling usually. Sometimes a slow roll to level. Only one indicated a departure into the spin but fairly slowly and relaxing on the controls tamed it.
On the other hand they generally go very neatly into a spin from a skidded turn. Also from a mishandled roll off the top - easier to spin upright but they will go inverted if the student is really hamfisted.

PS Mark1234, I generally agree with what you say.
djpil is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.