Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Quick log book question...

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Quick log book question...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Nov 2007, 22:47
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: London & NYC
Age: 42
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quick log book question...

Hi,

If as a PPL holder i fly as a passenger, doing the radios & helping with navigation etc should i be recording this in my log book?

Cheers.
Gav28 is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2007, 23:00
  #2 (permalink)  

Hovering AND talking
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Propping up bars in the Lands of D H Lawrence and Bishop Bonner
Age: 59
Posts: 5,705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quick answer? No.

You can record it in your log book but in a separate column because you can't count it.

Cheers

Whirls
Whirlygig is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2007, 23:00
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: one dot low as usual
Age: 66
Posts: 537
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can record what you like in your logbook. However operating as "P2" on an a/c type that doesn't require a copilot won't count for anything regards to licencing, experience etc.
Fright Level is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2007, 23:41
  #4 (permalink)  
Formerly HWD
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Indochina
Age: 57
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gav28,

Yes you can, but not as actual flying time. If you want to record your other aerial escapades in your log book (and why not) then log it as "SNY" (Supernumerary) and record the time only in the "Any other flying" column. This is defined in LASORS as "No duties assigned".

Last edited by Tony Hirst; 18th Nov 2007 at 06:32.
Tony Hirst is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2007, 23:53
  #5 (permalink)  

Hovering AND talking
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Propping up bars in the Lands of D H Lawrence and Bishop Bonner
Age: 59
Posts: 5,705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suspect the original poster wants to know if the hours can be counted; to which, the answer is "no"!

What anyone records in their log book is up to them, but it's what is allowable that counts!

Cheers

Whirls
Whirlygig is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2007, 09:23
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: London & NYC
Age: 42
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the responses guys.

Someone I spoke to was telling me(obviously erroneously) that I could log it as hours which I thought sounded odd. Was never actually thinking of counting it even if it was possible to do.

Cheers
Gav28 is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2007, 18:19
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,583
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
If you hold a FRTOL then you can log it as Radio Operator (FRO) in accordance with Article 35. If for some reason you didn't maintain your PPL and wanted to renew the FRTOL you would be asked for evidence of use of this licence which according to the ANO Schedule 8 is a Flight Crew Licence.
Whopity is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2007, 07:50
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Age: 52
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is a question which gets asked almost as frequently as the "should I fly a Warrior or a 172" question.

Maybe this subject could be given a 'sticky' and put on the front page?
julian_storey is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2007, 09:11
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
or better still people could actually read the rules and regulations which govern their flying....... Starting with LASORS.

What concerns me is how people manage to get pilot licenses without understanding the basic stuff.
S-Works is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2007, 09:35
  #10 (permalink)  
Formerly HWD
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Indochina
Age: 57
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bose,

I suspect because there is so much to wade through, it is understandable that many cannot see the wood for the trees. The PPL exam requirement to demonstrate 75% knowledge of just a subset of the essentials a potential issue.

My regulatory capability came from the Thom book, I don't actually recall how I learnt about web resources and LASORS. Thinking about it now, an hour's sit down with an instructor on a rainy day would have gone a long way to clearing up the muddle that I now know I was in during my PPL and beyond!
Tony Hirst is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2007, 09:44
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tony thats my issue really. The standards are too low. Too many Instructors interested only in the hours in there log book and not interested in what should really be the bulk of the PPL which is how to find the answers to this stuff.

The average PPL students lose a lot of flying time to bad weather, that should be used for ground school covering the sort of stuff that is not in the PPL exams.

I think things like the confuser make it even worse as it encourages students just to study for the exams rather than using the exams as a test for a broader knowledge base.

Stepping down from my high horse now....
S-Works is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2007, 10:08
  #12 (permalink)  
Formerly HWD
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Indochina
Age: 57
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bose,
I have no complaints over the quality of my flying training, standards were high and that is still apparent to me now. I suspect the instructors are responding to how the student progresses, as a student I just didn't know what I was missing and probably didn't communicate my muddle sufficiently. Only with experience has this become apparent. Perhaps my instructors had these gaps adequately filled during their initial training and so didn't perceive my issue. Perhaps my otherwise sterling progress through the PPL hid said muddle. Either way, there doesn't seem to be a detailed and proactive regulations and paperwork briefing.

With regards to the confuser, the CFI of my school was very non-plussed when I fell for one of the PPL Confuser's tell tale 'errors'!
Tony Hirst is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2007, 10:25
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tony, not so much the standard of the flying training I take issue with it the standard of the ground side. Way to much gets missed. A large problem being low hours instructors who go from CPL 'hour building' to the Instructor course to using PPL students as an hour building ride. They don't have time to learn the reality of the real world and have nothing to pass onto students with respect to real flight planning, regulations even simple stuff like NOTAM checking.

The number of pilots who get airborne without checking NOTAM still takes me breath away. This is something that should be drilled in by Instructors.

Wet windy day, we can't go flying lets have a look at NOTAM or review LASORS or how to access internet resources...............
S-Works is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2007, 11:00
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Age: 52
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm guessing that BOSE has been flying for a long time and has had lots of time to gain experience and knowledge. But with all due respect to him, how much did he know immediately after first got a licence?

I once heard a PPL described as a 'licence to learn' and that's exactly what it is. I've been flying for ten years and I'm lucky enough to be flying for a living these days - but I'm still learning. Almost every time I fly, I learn something new. That will probably remain the case for as long as I fly.

The most dangerous people are the ones who get a PPL and think that they know everything. The second most dangerous are the ones who get a PPL and think that they are expected to know everything and are afraid to ask about things they don't know in case they look silly.

Questions come up on this forum again and again which to experienced pilots like BOSE seem banal, unecessary and things which the people who posted them should have known the answer to anyway. Personally, I'm glad that this forum exists so that these questions CAN be asked.
julian_storey is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.