Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Arrow PA-28 Experienced In-Flight Break-Up

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Arrow PA-28 Experienced In-Flight Break-Up

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Nov 2007, 20:52
  #121 (permalink)  
Professional Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: My Secret Island Lair
Posts: 638
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
I do prefer the Supercub for tailwheel flying (especially if it's had it's new radio fitted!) however warming to G-DRAG recently. Managed to get it in and out of Chilbolton with 2 up earlier this year (one of which was an instructor I might add!)

Glad it happened in the air to you (rather than anywhere else) - as you say it is slow, I thought I'd selected one stage retraction during the latter half of the touch and go, but as my workload was high/capacity full etc etc I didn't notice I'd accidentally dropped the lot off until the lift just kept on dropping off too!

Anyway, back to thread, any aircraft will most likely breakup if mishandled/put through suffcient turbulence, Bonanzas are built stronger but not immune, and I will still fly OSFC's Arrow despite the fact that one disintegrated recently cos I love it to pieces
(sorry for the flippancy, rather long day, still in the office slaving away!)

Last edited by hobbit1983; 21st Nov 2007 at 20:53. Reason: clarification
hobbit1983 is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2007, 21:22
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Contacttower - clearly that ASI needs replacing. If it's very old then the speed has run out and can't be refilled again...

On a different note. The discussion about touch'n'goes or not is interesting. I did plenty of them when doing my PPLs way back (I feel ancient but it was only 15 years ago). Now that I'm an instructor and see things from a different perspective I've come to appreciate that as an instructor you need to be very cool (as in relaxed, not Rayban cool) if you're going to let a student do TnGs on first solo, or subsequent solos.

As someone pointed out, some of the risks involved with TnG include the focus shift required from landing and then taking off. I've noticed with a few of my recent students that they can't keep the centerline in the vicinity of the aircraft when rolling for the take off, while a stop and go makes things completely normal. If I'd let them go alone I'd have to pick them out of the woods. The other issue I find is in the stressed situation after settling. Because airspeed is much higher than normal in the beginning of a take off, the aircraft is close to flying speed and some students end up wheelbarrowing down the runway before I can persuade them to get the stick back. It's not a perfect situation, but I think eventually most students manage TnGs rather well and it does maintain a certain flow in the pattern.
deice is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 01:10
  #123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Poplar Grove, IL, USA
Posts: 1,112
Received 101 Likes on 71 Posts
I did about 100 hours before I did a T&G according to my logbook. Learned to fly in a PA12. I don't think I've ever done a T&G in a super cub or a pawnee, but those are working airplanes. I have done them in the cessna 140, though I find it is easier to leave the flaps either all the way up or just 1-2 notches.
-- IFMU

Last edited by IFMU; 22nd Nov 2007 at 02:11.
IFMU is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.