Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

QF638 go-around and diversion at YBBN

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

QF638 go-around and diversion at YBBN

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th May 2003, 08:22
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Brisbane, Aust
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Loved the VB can angle of attack indicator. Watch for the telemovie coming soon to aa station near you.
badarse is offline  
Old 17th May 2003, 12:45
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face Incredulous

I find some of the responses on this thread quite alarming.

I don't understand how people can realistically think that the operating crew didn't consider Coolangatta or Maroochy. I can't imagine any RPT Jet captain diverting BN to TW and not considering closer alternatives.

Flight Detent

In this day and age, if the pax deplane, they must be security screened before re boarding. I have enough trouble getting security people on hand for day time unscheduled tech stop (for fuel), I would imagine that in TW at night, it would be nigh on impossible.

Therefore, no security, no deplane, and your belief that you should be able to get off becomes irrelevant.
Dan Kelly is offline  
Old 17th May 2003, 14:13
  #63 (permalink)  
Area 7
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Very normal really.

A/C departed knowing RW01/19 closed due works. (Thats why they had enough fuel to reach TW).

They planned to do the VOR/BME to RW14. Didn't get visual and went round.

CG and maroochy had similar WX and only VOR app's as well.

Decided to divert to TW ( a normal QF 737 alternate) with required reserves and where the WX was better.

Waited on the ground TW until Wx improved or RW 01/19 reopened.

Simple and all legal!
 
Old 17th May 2003, 21:15
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: AUS
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seems to me, that at the end of the day it probably was a big stuff up. Lousy weather and only the cross strip would seem to be a pretty good reason not to go.
To dig a bit deeper, who decides the fuel uplift for QF Domestic and why wasn't Rocky the alternate, agent on ground etc.
Spotlight is offline  
Old 17th May 2003, 22:03
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wybacrik
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

You're right Area 7..."very simple and all legal"

Also very amateurish I would suggest, to carry out a missed approach (quite proper) followed by a divert( quite proper)
and then plonk down in a "paddock" and sit there for 3/4 hrs with no amenities for the SLF.

Seems more like a G/A operation to me than RPT!

I ask the question again...is TW a normal alternate for Qantas 737 ops?

Or was this an emergency situation, which would change the whole outlook of course.
amos2 is offline  
Old 17th May 2003, 23:50
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,800
Received 51 Likes on 25 Posts
Amos,

HE was there, YOU weren't.

Kindly list every delay and divertion you've ever made so we can all play "Monday Morning Quarter Back" and second guess you!

I would call YOURS the unproffestional attitude!
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 18th May 2003, 06:39
  #67 (permalink)  
short flights long nights
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 3,905
Received 198 Likes on 65 Posts
Amos. I am having trouble at your reason. The FACTS appear to be, aircraft arrives, crew decides not to land and diverts to a suitable airport I did not know that having a five star hotel with a Roller Shuttle, was a requirement for a diversion, I thought it was just to keep your aircraft, your crew, and your pax safe. Perhaps you have never had that task?
SOPS is offline  
Old 18th May 2003, 06:55
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Here and there.
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Amos

I thought you had read Area 7's post.......he does say that TW is a normal QF 737 alternate.
RaTa is offline  
Old 18th May 2003, 09:00
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wybacrik
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

I am more than happy to be admonished if TW is a normal alternate for Qantas...and it would seem it is.

So, why are we all having this discussion?
amos2 is offline  
Old 18th May 2003, 15:19
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The QF PR department needs a rocket for not leaping to the defence of the crew. Their silence was positively insulting to all professional aircrew.
lambsie is offline  
Old 18th May 2003, 15:40
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Here and there.
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lambsie..... I suppose that they have not said anything is because 24 hrs after the event, the only place where it is remembered and discussed is in here!
RaTa is offline  
Old 18th May 2003, 17:19
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wybacrik
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Are you for real Over The Top?

Quote..."no stairs mean no pax leave the A/C"

No stairs mean no one leaves the A/C!

Think about it a bit more!
amos2 is offline  
Old 19th May 2003, 09:00
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Dunnunda & Godzone
Age: 74
Posts: 4,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds to me like the system worked exactly as it should.

Anyone who has flown around in countries where they have REAL weather, would recognise this as a relatively common occurence.

OK the trigger was runway repairs, but the Tamworth option was a weather enforced one.

Last time it happened to me was Wichita/Denver diverted to Rapid City about an hour North, parked up with abo9ut half a dozen others, pleasant couple of hours wandering about the terminal (Tamworth sized), quick dash back to Denver to catch a hole in the weather and the last aircraft in or out for three days, after spending another hour groping our way from the runway to the terminal.

No drama, no ructions, just the way it is.

We don't know how lucky we are with Oz wx.
Woomera is offline  
Old 19th May 2003, 18:22
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: AUS
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Iwilljeesuswheeze

I gather from your previous posts that you don't actually work in the industry. Assuming it is your intention to gain employment, take some advice and don't go sending off emails to TV stations.
Spotlight is offline  
Old 22nd May 2003, 11:23
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I will

Flying for nothing for Jehovas until they wake up to you doesnt count.
FiveTanks? is offline  
Old 23rd May 2003, 18:03
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wybacrik
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This thread has totally lost the plot!
amos2 is offline  
Old 25th May 2003, 13:15
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and...have you gone solo yet?
tenke is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.