Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

CASA Sting that went wrong......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Mar 2003, 04:06
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Home
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CASA Sting that went wrong......

Is it true that two female CASA employees chartered an aircraft on friday from Bankstown and flew down to, I think it was Moruya, and had arranged a CASA person from Canberra office to wait at the airport to charge the company for something or other?

Apparently the stingers ended up getting stung themselves for Entrapment . So called legal eagles appear to have had their wings clipped........Done yet again..........

CASA was phoned and one of the girls names was requested from the switch , just a moment I'll put you through!
Caught ...... Surely that would be entrapment?

Any truth to the rumour???????????????
Red Rat Lukey is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2003, 07:51
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where are the very vocal and enthusiastic ex board members of AOPA who live in this neck of the woods?

This should have the cats a wailing, and unless all the yuppies are at playlunch, there seems to be a deafening silence.

Perhaps they only work Monday to Friday ?

We need more info.
axiom is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2003, 08:24
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fish

Depends on the terms of the contract of charter. If the CASA girls presented a circumstance that lead to the charter company conducting an illegal act, that, but for the presented circumstance would not have happened then it sounds like entrapment...

However if the CASA girls simply chartered a plane to go from A to B expecting the flight to be conducted within all legal boundaries and circumstances then it sounds more like a possible Agent Provocateur... which is honky Dorry ...

Just depends on the original terms and whether there was inducements or circumstances calculated to get the charter company to break the law..

Thats what the wife (legal beagle) recons anyway....

Apollo 4 is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2003, 08:52
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Oz
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, sounds like a good rumour, roughly in the category of urban myth. Whoever thought that one up has watched way too much television, and certainly has no idea of how the legal system here works.
Foyl is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2003, 08:37
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey Red Rat;

Did you get my email reply? Things went "dud" my end and makes me suspicious about security matters given the text.

In short if you didn't,

No they are not after them, they are part of them.

See where this thing goes before further contact. Serious.
axiom is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2003, 23:42
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: yssy
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It seems that the only item missing from the clothes worn by the "officials" was a swastika.
kimwest is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2003, 02:23
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Home
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes Foyle, and the media are always correct.

Politicians don't lie.

And by the way have you gone solo yet ?

Hows the bank job going ?

Just about finished your Airfix model of the Stuka?

But yes you know the system, thats why your on here................
Red Rat Lukey is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2003, 03:28
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Careful, Red Rat;

You could end up like me, if you say something conspiratorial (heavens, "CASA don't do that, we are here to help you"), the usual response is to question your paranoia.

If you respond to some of the opposition posts that don't agree with you, you are also paranoid.

And whatever you do, don't make anything, that could be construed as a threat, even if it isn't.

To dismiss your original post borders on foolish. There must be something that made you write it. I'm sure we will hear about it in due course.

By the way, some of the opposition have multiple personalities, especially in the region you mentioned and have regularly posted many replies and also get to vote on polls more than once.



Who called ME paranoid ??
axiom is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2003, 07:37
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Oz
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah Luke, you really have me tagged...
Foyl is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.