Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

110 seater jets for Bankstown, Moorabbin, Archerfield

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

110 seater jets for Bankstown, Moorabbin, Archerfield

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Sep 2013, 04:58
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"country completely broke"

let me guess, you voted coalition because <insert generic nonsense about economic emergency here>?

on topic: AFAIK strengthening the runways as opposed to lengthening them would actually be more costly wouldn't it?

Last edited by kabukiman; 26th Sep 2013 at 05:07.
kabukiman is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2013, 05:01
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So you think the gummit should spent with gay abandon to get our debt level up to the same as other countries? We have billions and billions of debt which you and I and my kids have to pay off; I'm in no mood for those jokers in Canberra to borrow even more, thank you.
Are you serious? you never studied economics at all did you
kabukiman is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2013, 05:06
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suspect that the citizens living in proximity to Bankstown might have something to say about the idea of turning it into a busy regional hub. Ditto for Archerfield, Moorabbin. Any airport established or expanded in the middle of suburban housing will very soon be hamstrung by curfews and noise complaints. Does the OP know about Essendon?

Assuming that existing airport expansion isn't possible, it's cheaper in the long run to build a new airport in a rural or industrial area, and protect it from housing development. It's that last factor that sinks many airports, and unfortunately there's not much will to establish and enforce housing restrictions in Australia.
I never was able to get my head around people who buy houses near airports such as YMEN and complain about noise.....

Just like the folk who move in next to pubs and have them shut down because the live music is annoying. Never mind they'd been a music venue for decades prior.

In YMMB's case the few jets that come in and out of there aren't any noisier on take off or landing than some of the piston aircraft IME. They're a bit annoying to stand near in the parking areas however.

MB is already pretty busy, I don't think a few flights a day in these new jets would make much of an impact however
kabukiman is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2013, 10:18
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
MB is already pretty busy, I don't think a few flights a day in these new jets would make much of an impact however
Well, the mooted 10 flights per day into YSBK is said to be enough to shut down all training, and severely impact all IFR movements, so what would happen at YMMB?? And that is not me speaking, that is from the draft masterplan, after "consultations" with Airservices and CASA.

Tootle pip!!

Last edited by LeadSled; 26th Sep 2013 at 10:20.
LeadSled is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2013, 12:22
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: melb
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'Kaby' it's not so much the noise, the few extra movements or so it's the COST, the infrastructure or lack of it that has this idea as pie in the sky stuff. Christ ANY Aussie Govt or private operator can't get the most basic things sorted (especially when it comes to aviation) never lone this hair brained scheme to fix a completely useless permanent problem we have in Oz, LACK OF FORESIGHT & LEADERSHIP!

Syd is a joke re utilization & with & having BK in close prox would mean all sorts of delays for A/C in & out of both dromes (SY&BK)


Wmk2
Wally Mk2 is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2013, 06:14
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Syd is a joke re utilization & with & having BK in close prox would mean all sorts of delays for A/C in & out of both dromes (SY&BK)
Wally Mk2,
Only because of self imposed limitations in Australian ATC. If we could handle traffic like the US, Bankstown would not be a problem, and training would not be forced out for a miserable 10 RPT movements per day.

Get a map of the Los Angeles basin, and count up the number of airports and airfields, and it is not much bigger than the Sydney basin, and ringed on three sides with much bigger hills than Sydney.

As an ATC traffiv handling problem, Sydney is almost analogous to Honolulu International --- look at what they quite comfortably accommodate.

Tootle pip!!
LeadSled is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2013, 05:06
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: queensland australia
Posts: 138
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looking at all the Fokker 100's & 70's and Bae 146's at Essendon today for the Grand Final, you would have to say Essendon is very well suited to handle such traffic. They make the airport look alive again.
Nig not nog
nig&nog is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2013, 07:44
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: melb
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'Leady' we all know why of the limitations that's not in dispute here but it is a joke because of that, the end result, that was my ref.
We are in a bubble when it comes to aviation, the boffins whom make the draconian rules simply have no idea!

Wmk2
Wally Mk2 is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2013, 08:57
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well I heard the next airport to be built will be on the Central Coast. All a done deal apparently. BK relegated to a slow death to be consumed by the ever expanding metropolis.

sc
sprocket check is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2013, 12:50
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sydney
Age: 44
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From what I noticed about the Badgerys Creek plan it seems like it would cut a large chunk out of the training area for YSBK, or at least displace it significantly. Assuming that hot potato ever gets planted, wouldn't that end any need for RPT out of YSBK, and possibly with the impact to training also cause longevity issues for the airport operators?
SgtBundy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.