Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

IAL - Entry below IAF altitude

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Sep 2013, 02:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: brisbane
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IAL - Entry below IAF altitude

Approaching an IAF at an altitude above MSA/LSALT but below the initial approach altitude, can I enter that approach without climbing?

Example, Amberley ILS-Z RWY 15. Assuming I'm flying the full approach. Tracking 320 to the NDB at 4000 (above 10NM MSA) ready to commence the approach. Chart says must cross IAF not below 5100 however there is an immediate descent to 2500 before a procedure turn. Can I cross the IAF at 4000 and proceed outbound descending to not below 2500? Thoughts?
blacksmith is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2013, 03:23
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: The Ponderosa
Age: 52
Posts: 845
Received 16 Likes on 6 Posts
IAL - Entry below IAF altitude

Yes, be adventurous and try 3400.
My chart makes no mention that I have to be at 5100.

Last edited by hoss; 4th Sep 2013 at 03:26.
hoss is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2013, 03:26
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 68
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thoughts?

Don't see any reason why not, the 5100 is the minimum surveyed height for the pattern.

Down to 2500, procedure turn at 8.8.
Bladeangle is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2013, 03:54
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 497
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Yes you can.

It comes down to the limitations of charting all available options on an approach plate. Basically we always try and design a procedure that starts at the highest MSA applicable for the approach. In this case its 5100ft, and that is what we chart. But if you are coming from another sector, or are established within 10nm, then (provided you stay within the area) you are protected at those heights.

In this case you can maneuver as required anywhere within 10nm at 3400ft...that includes starting the procedure.

Alpha

Last edited by alphacentauri; 4th Sep 2013 at 03:55.
alphacentauri is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2013, 03:57
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south pacific vagrant
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chart says must cross IAF not below 5100
i've always known it as the procedure commencement altitude when shown on the lateral view. usually coincident with minimum height in the hold.

remember that the concept of a positive fix ohead, descending in the hold from enroute altitudes as required and timed outbounds was all they had back in the day before dme, gps, radar vectoring, controlled airspace, traffic info, 25nm msa's etc. approach design still has hangovers from then.

questions like yours arise because these scenarios are now safely possible with respect to terrain that technology didnt previously allow or the procedure rules hadnt even thought of, let alone cater for back then.

i wouldnt start the approach overhead below 5100 (unless under radar control) on a flight test if thats what youre getting at, especially octa. a last minute requirement for holding ohead will see you red faced.

trying to find a reference but i dont like my chances

Last edited by waren9; 4th Sep 2013 at 08:55.
waren9 is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2013, 05:55
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: brisbane
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great thanks guys. That's my feeling - safe yes, but not for a flight test. Thanks for the feedback.
blacksmith is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2013, 06:04
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: The Ponderosa
Age: 52
Posts: 845
Received 16 Likes on 6 Posts
IAL - Entry below IAF altitude

Absolutely, waren9 makes a lot of good points.

Legal versus Practical(safe).

I would expect to go over at an altitude closer to 10000' in a jet.

Last edited by hoss; 4th Sep 2013 at 06:06.
hoss is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2013, 06:25
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,314
Received 184 Likes on 92 Posts
I would expect to go over at an altitude closer to 10000' in a jet.
That jet must have the descent profile of a brick!
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2013, 09:15
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I no longer have a VTC to confirm, but if you're conducting this approach outside Amberley hours, consider the Brisbane control steps. From memory the control step was 4500', so the approach was started down at the MSA to remain OCTA while still being safe.

I can't see why it would fail a CIR test to commence the approach below 5100. This would be something I'd discuss with the ATO to gain his expectation of how it will be flown. I'd dare say he'd be more impressed about your application of IFR and local knowledge.

If AMB is active they might just vector your anyway.
VH-FTS is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2013, 12:07
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,314
Received 184 Likes on 92 Posts
FTS. Lets not overly complicate the original question!
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2013, 13:50
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,634
Received 115 Likes on 64 Posts
I would expect to go over at an altitude closer to 10000' in a jet.
7000ft....
Capn Bloggs is online now  
Old 4th Sep 2013, 18:24
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If anyone finds my reasoning complicated they shouldn't hold a CIR. The original post revolved around AMB, I gave an extra and relevant consideration.
VH-FTS is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2013, 20:48
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: The Ponderosa
Age: 52
Posts: 845
Received 16 Likes on 6 Posts
IAL - Entry below IAF altitude

I'll meet you in the middle at 8500' for the first attempt but I think we'll be 'dragging it in'.

Without checking the charts I was just relating it to Launy were we regularly go over the top around transition for the ILS reversal. Similar distances with a 80/260 turn.

Regards hoss
hoss is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2013, 23:05
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,634
Received 115 Likes on 64 Posts
Originally Posted by Hoss
I'll meet you in the middle at 8500' for the first attempt but I think we'll be 'dragging it in'.
27 track miles (2x12 + about 3 for the procedure turn), not allowing for the DME position.

Final offer, 7950ft.
Capn Bloggs is online now  
Old 4th Sep 2013, 23:20
  #15 (permalink)  
Wan
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bloggs / Hoss - how do you get these numbers? I use the following rules of thumb: 3 x altitude for distance and 5 x groundspeed for rate of descent.

So for 27 miles, that would give 9000 feet (to threshold, I add a few miles if joining a circuit).
Wan is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2013, 00:32
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,634
Received 115 Likes on 64 Posts
Medium Jets 101: 9k/30nm, 7k/25nm, 5k/20nm.

or

3x altitude to lose + 5nm decel (+ a couple of miles for 10k slowup to 250)

Descent rate on final better: half the groundspeed (add zeros as required to make numbers nice). GS 140, sink 70 (0).

On that AMB ILS unless I was familiar, I'd be erring on the side of caution; lower than usual. Back to 7000ft over the top outbound!!
Capn Bloggs is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.