Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

The end off the "snag sheet".

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Nov 2012, 04:32
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: dans un cercle dont le centre est eveywhere et circumfernce n'est nulle part
Posts: 2,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The end off the "snag sheet".

http://casa.gov.au/wcmswr/_assets/ma...worth/51_1.pdf

I personally find it interesting that an aircraft owned by me some time ago had elevator trim cables cut more than half way through when the previous owner "disconnected the rudder/ aleiron system, yet when submitted to CASA for inspection and corrective action, they "LOST" those cables.

I won't go into details, except to say the Director of Aviation Safety had a known association with the engineer who signed the aircraft out as airworthy, cut cables and all. It's also well documentated in various papers that CASA staff were taking bets as to how far I could fly before I killed myself.

I'm also unsure as to why it has taken since 1996, a Commonwealth Ombudsmans investigation and Parliamentary intervention to get someone to acknowledge there are problems with the system, or whether this is a "brainfart" by a Bureaucrat and a means to get rid of snag sheets. (which used sensibly are better than a MR annotation which could ground an aircraft for a suspect CHT gauge in the GAFA by a junior pilot).

If a maintenance schedule allows for identified issues to be addressed, repaired and rectified by a LAME, why the hell does he have to notify CASA if it's signed off on the MR or a real problem has been identified in a snag sheet and rectified?

Someone, (in their opinion), is guilty of an offence, so it saves CASA going on a "fishing trip" I guess.

Abbott's speech today identified bureaucratic red tape and over regulation as an impediment to productivity. This highlights his frustration.

This possibly also impedes free trade between The States as provided for in The Constitution if a QLD aircraft is stuck in WA because of a faulty cigarette lighter.

Last edited by Frank Arouet; 2nd Nov 2012 at 04:36.
Frank Arouet is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2012, 05:15
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: australia
Posts: 1,684
Received 47 Likes on 31 Posts
RED tape.....

I'll betcha Abbott can't change the mind-set of pollies to change the mind set of bureaucrazies to reduce red tape& regulations that..,.. a) control other people and b) keeps them in a job producing this sh*te.
Triply/ 3 ways !.. Local, State and Federal. What an obscene burden.
Oz/Regulatastan is "a free country"... but severely bound by bureaucaratic chains. Its Bigtime BS tru. To the detriment of the whole nation.

About free trade....
Case in point... years ago, when in AWK AOC ,we were told by an FOI that we must not fly to jobs INTERSTATE ! Que ???... because we would require a licences (plural) to operate in other states. On contacting a Dept of Transport, they just laughed and said..IF you are a passenger carrying RPT op, then you needed an INTRASTATE licence to transport pax from QLD to say, NT. I was unaware that VH was just a Qld rego !
A FOI/"expert" who didnt know his onions.!

CASA are also into prevention of free trade, with regs (illegal?) that inhibit "commerce"...and that commerce having SFA to do with aviation "safety".

When will politicians get to legislate to remove all the surplus "red tape"?
NEVER.!!!
aroa is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2012, 05:31
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 91 Likes on 34 Posts
Federal law trumps the states. Check to see if your state ceded powers over aviation to Canberra at the time of the signing of the Warsaw convention in 1921.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2012, 05:58
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: dans un cercle dont le centre est eveywhere et circumfernce n'est nulle part
Posts: 2,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That doesn't stop Albanese blaming the incumbant Liberal party for the second airport debacle in Sydney.
Frank Arouet is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2012, 08:46
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Federal law trumps the states. Check to see if your state ceded powers over aviation to Canberra at the time of the signing of the Warsaw convention in 1921.
That's true(ish), but unfortunately there is both Federal and High Court precedent that the constitutional powers granted to the Commonwealth in regulating trade and commerce, includes the regulation of aviation.

(Engage cynical comment mode)Otherwise you can be sure SQ would have parked Tiger squarely in a non-ceded state and told CASA where it could stick its grounding.(End cynicism)
Woodwork is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2012, 11:38
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So NZ is a state then, cheap labour and all...
yowieII is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.