Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Your thoughts on dodgy logging of instrument flight time.

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Your thoughts on dodgy logging of instrument flight time.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Jul 2012, 11:40
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,314
Received 184 Likes on 92 Posts
3 hours in 90 day
The only reason to log IF time!

Ooops! I must be cheating. I'm logging 25hrs a year!
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2012, 14:29
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,198
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 9 Posts
If I fly a fair dinkum approach but in VMC I'll log a small amount 0.2 or so dependant upon the length of time I am flying the dials only.
Careful what you say. CASA read Pprune and now you admit to cheating just an itsy bit of 0.2 of VMC. A courageous decision Prime Minister
Centaurus is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2012, 22:50
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Qld troppo
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
RENURPP - your post is deeply offensive!

"Folk hero" status cannot be achieved by flying just any old Bonanza - it has to be a V-tail !

Dr

Last edited by ForkTailedDrKiller; 6th Jul 2012 at 22:52.
ForkTailedDrKiller is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2012, 23:13
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: The Hornets Nest, NSW
Posts: 832
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Centaurus there is no cheating involved. Flight by sole reference to instruments is instrument flight when flying in multi crew or with a safety pilot - even in VMC (day or night), as there is no legal requirement to restrict external vision (foggles, covered screen etc) - even during a test. I was admonished many years ago by a CASA FOI when I put forward a point of view similar to your one there whilst I was undergoing a Chief Pilot assessment flight test... Their rules, not mine.

On a side note, have always enjoyed your contributions.

Regards,

OpsN.
OpsNormal is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2012, 01:53
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 268
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
All depends on where you're based.

Here in Oz the regs talk "flight solely by reference to instruments" so that means IMC (and not night VFR, though I agree that some nights you might as well be IMC) and it's typically 0.1 or 0.2 climbing through the clouds, though sometime you can arrange to cruise in cloud

In Europe now and Asia, they refer to IFR time - flight under IFR procedures, which is the whole lot.

Personally, I keep two columns - the real "instrument time", and then use one of the spare columns for IFR time - which is much more than IMC time.
drpixie is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2012, 03:05
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Oz
Posts: 910
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
The other night I was out west of Hay, night vfr, 9500, high above a layer of stratus. No lights could be seen, no horizon, no ground lights, no stars, nothing. Total blackness. Does this qualify as IMC.
nomorecatering is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2012, 03:07
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,314
Received 184 Likes on 92 Posts
There was a full moon the other night!
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2012, 03:16
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sydney
Age: 60
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My airline seems to be a standard entry of 30mins per sector/ 1hr if WX crappy. This is only to cover 3hrs/90days.
25+ years of it gives me about 850hrs. If you wanted me to count all "IMC" time then it would be probably 5000-10000hrs!
I do mainly 5-10 hr sectors so with A/P generally coming on at about 5000' once clean and off again at about 1000' on final once cleared to land then the "hand-flying" hours would never meet the 3/90 requirement.
[only every second sector as I give the F/O some too!]
I now fly Airbus so am never "really" hand-flying.

Last edited by Tankengine; 7th Jul 2012 at 03:18.
Tankengine is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2012, 06:13
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 276
Received 39 Likes on 9 Posts
CAO 40 doesnt help much either;

"10.9 Instrument flight time may be logged by the pilot monitoring or providing input to the autopilot/auto-stabilisation equipment when it is engaged or by the pilot manually manipulating the controls when the aircraft is flown by reference to instruments under either actual or simulated instrument flight conditions."

At high altitude, with no discernable horizon (day or night) and not navigiating by sole reference to a visible horizon or to ground or water (ie; you are not flying visually) what are you doing?

Flying (or monitoring the autopilot flying) by reference to the instruments.
ramble on is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2012, 07:15
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Sydney
Posts: 292
Received 16 Likes on 9 Posts
following on from ramble on's post

I reckon that when technically VFR by day in terms of horizontal visibility etc, but with no horizon, just a small patch of ocean/dirt below, and a small patch of sky blue somewhere above, this is actually IMC.
Seabreeze is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2012, 13:28
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,198
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 9 Posts
Flight by sole reference to instruments is instrument flight when flying in multi crew or with a safety pilot - even in VMC (day or night), as there is no legal requirement to restrict external vision (foggles, covered screen etc) - even during a test
I am a little confused. If there is no legal requirement to restrict external vision for simulated instrument flying then am I right in assuming you can tell the ATO or an FOI to belt up because you refuse to wear an instrument flying hood on your instrument rating test because there is nothing in the Regs to say you need a hood or some type?

Does that also mean anyone can simply look at his instruments and promise not to peek outside and legally log instrument flying?
Centaurus is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2012, 10:20
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Forrest
Posts: 89
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I concur with the bloke near Hay.
Was surveying out the back of Telfer the other night (before the moon rose)
and I can tell you was near impossible to keep the wings level without reference to instruments.
Once the moon rose and I had a horizon obviously this was then visual.

Anyway, if you can't keep it level without the a h then it is I f. If you can then it is not.
Cessna 180 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.