Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Ndb Approaches

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Mar 2011, 23:04
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne
Age: 40
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Locations with only an NDB approach:

Bromelton, QLD
Camooweal, QLD
Georgetown, QLD
Gibb River, WA
Jervois, NT
ollie_a is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2011, 03:29
  #42 (permalink)  
swh

Eidolon
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Some hole
Posts: 2,185
Received 24 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by ForkTailedDrKiller
Not sure I understand the question but - how about Townsville down to Bowen for the GPS RNAV and back to TL for the ILS ??
A lot of the ILS approaches in Australia use a NDB for the hold associated with the procedure, YBTL is one of the few locations where the hold is defined by a NDB and VOR. Entry into the hold, and a holding pattern is a test item for the ILS.

CAO 40.2.1 says the holder may act as pilot in command or co-pilot of an aircraft being flown under the I.F.R. only if each navigation aid or procedure that is used to navigate the aircraft during the flight has been endorsed in his or her personal log book.

General instrument flight and the use of at least the NDB or the VOR as a navigation and approach aid also needs to be tested. So some enroute VOR tracking should be included (item 23 on the test form) to cover the VOR as a navigation aid. This could be easily covered on that route with a Bowen 2 SID where you are required to intercept the outbound track by 20 or 30 DME TL depending on the runway in use on the day.
swh is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2011, 04:09
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The cloud
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Even on steam driven gear won't your rmi show flags when the ndb drops out and point 090/270?

Agree on the only requirement being to listen below lsalt or passing the iaf...

Even for the tracking After reaching topd wouldn't you be tracking on gps?
You could of even been tracking dr... Nothing stopping you flying approaches ifr in vmc...

Had a few renewals where I have been told to "turn off that god aweful noise" one of those times being a Cp check (yes it was 8/8's bluesky) so if your mate is telling the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth feel he might of been screwed a little...
Xcel is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2011, 04:14
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Qld troppo
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Locations with only an NDB approach:
Bromelton, QLD
Camooweal, QLD
Georgetown, QLD
Gibb River, WA
Jervois, NT
Interesting group of holiday destinations there!

Bromelton - nowhere to land there!
Camooweal - landing is currently restricted to RFDS only. Not a problem cause I can't imagine anyone really wants to go there anyway!
Georgetown - OK, you got me. Not registered or certified so no GPS RNAV approach, but I have landed there a few times so I guess someone may want to go there occassionally.
Gibb River - I think the only reason that there is an NDB there is that it is too remote to go there an pull it out!
Jervois - Not registered or certified so no GPS RNAV approach. NDB is historical only! Like Gibb River, maybe the only reason there is an airstrip there was to service the NDB.

I wonder what % of Oz pilots can get through their entire careers without the need to ever go to these places, let alone fly an approach in IMC?

Dr
ForkTailedDrKiller is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2011, 04:54
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Enroute from Dagobah to Tatooine...!
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There's plenty of places that have just one aid (NDB) plus RNAV. Sure, if you go there in IMC you will probably pick the RNAV approach to fly before the NDB, but try going out to some of these places and see what it would be like legally meeting requirements if the NDBs were removed and your delightful machine of choice is not TSO146! On top of that, what about non-IRS equipped IFR en-route position fixing requirements? On top of that, I'm sure I'm not the only one to have had GPS do funny things at inappropriate times. Always nice to have a ground based aid to revert to.
Captain Nomad is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2011, 08:17
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 807
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Gibb River - I think the only reason that there is an NDB there is that it is too remote to go there an pull it out!
Really? At that airstrip is the station homestead and the Ngallagunda community.
Jervois - Not registered or certified so no GPS RNAV approach. NDB is historical only! Like Gibb River, maybe the only reason there is an airstrip there was to service the NDB.
On Google Earth it appears to be a well maintained station airstrip.

Last edited by bentleg; 11th Mar 2011 at 08:47.
bentleg is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2011, 11:44
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Permanently lost
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think Jervois was originally installed to service a mine out that way. I doubt anyone has done an approach out there since 2006 when one of our chaps did his MECIR renewal and did the NDB part out there. He needed a bit of time in the aircraft which was why I suggested Jervois. Don't think the CP/ATO was too happy with the time it took to get there from Alice Springs.
PLovett is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2011, 20:58
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 807
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Gibb River was more than likely put in as a waypoint between Derby and Wyndham. (It's 11 nm off the direct track YDBY - YWYM)
bentleg is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2011, 22:38
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: S37.54 E145.11
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bentleg:
Gibb River was more than likely put in as a waypoint between Derby and Wyndham.
You're half right, I think. The GIB NDB was originally installed to service the navigation needs of DC3s involved in the Air Beef Scheme in the late 1940s, early 50s, before the Gibb River Rd was constructed.

Glenroy station at the time was one of the largest abatoirs in the region (if not Australia) and DC3s and Bristol Freighters used to land to uplift beef products to Wyndham port for onwards shipping to the southern states and internationally. The Gibb NDB was an enroute aid to facilitate navigation between Glenroy and Wyndam. Talking to some of the older pilots involved in the Air Beef Scheme, my impression was that there were numerous flight each day into/out of Glenroy Station at the time.

Last edited by QSK?; 11th Mar 2011 at 23:32.
QSK? is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2011, 00:45
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Qld troppo
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Glenroy station at the time was one of the largest abatoirs in the region (if not Australia) and DC3s and Bristol Freighters used to land to uplift beef products to Wyndham port for onwards shipping to the southern states and internationally.

No, the Glenroy Meatworks was actually very small. and unfortunately the Air Beef Scheme was interesting, but ill conceived and doomed to fail.

"The Glenroy Meatworks" was capable of handling up to 60 bullocks per day, with the abbatoir treating up to 2000 caracasses for the neighbouring stations per season.
ForkTailedDrKiller is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2011, 06:12
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Mars
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think. The GIB NDB was originally installed to service the navigation needs of DC3s involved in the Air Beef Scheme in the late 1940s, early 50s,
Says it all about NDB's!

Even on steam driven gear won't your rmi show flags when the ndb drops out and point 090/270?
Might be true of a modern ADF, (not that there is such a thing) but there are still a lot of pre-steam supposedly IFR ADF's that dont have any indication of failure, flying in the state of the art Australian GA fleet .
Clearedtoreenter is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2011, 23:49
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Pacific
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The ident is not a good warning of failure because it is not positive. Losing a signal is not going to wake you up like a warning tone would, or a flag. Most pilots would miss it, especially if there was something else going on that had their attention.
If you monitor the needle, you can tell it is working because it gives a consistent bearing. A needle that was stationary would attract my attention even if it was identing.
I had a Nav in a C47 tune the ADF (Radio Compass in those days!) in Auto then switch it to Antenna because that was the procedure he was used to, although in the airplane he usually flew the positions of the switch were reversed. So even though I could hear a fine ident, the needle was absolutely steady on the nose. I was feeling pretty good at how well I could fly a course until the error was picked up! It was pitch black and we were about 1000 feet below the tops of the nearby hills at the time, so it was a lesson well learned.
Many years later I was the only one of about 4 company 747s that landed in Taipei when the power failed at the airport in bad weather and the only aid still working was the NDB. The other crews were never taught how to fly the approach and they all diverted.
Sometimes the old ways still work. How long since you have done a GCA?
boofhead is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2011, 04:04
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: FL370
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's plenty of places that have just one aid (NDB) plus RNAV. Sure, if you go there in IMC you will probably pick the RNAV approach to fly before the NDB
Having an ADF, being current on it, and using it for alternate requirements is quite different from chosing to actually fly an NDB appr in anger! Hard to imagine any flying IFR these days doesn't at least have a TSO 129 GPS available to them.
That is if you're RNAV endorsed. There's still those like myself that even after 3 years in FNQ, for some reason, haven't got that box ticked off yet. In fact, less than half my work mates are RNAV endorsed. So it's the good old ndb approach, all over the cape and gulf for us. Mind you when actually in the soup, tracking and guidance is almost entirely off the gps anyway.

Last edited by gretzky99; 13th Mar 2011 at 12:44.
gretzky99 is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2011, 08:04
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Age: 70
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Georgetown - OK, you got me. Not registered or certified so no GPS RNAV approach, but I have landed there a few times so I guess someone may want to go there occassionally.


RFDS Kingair used to be there every week for a clinic while I was working there five years ago.
Delta_Foxtrot is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 03:30
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Something I particularly like about NDB approaches is that I always know where the beacon is w.r.t. to me. Not the same at all with a VOR. GPS is similar although can only give position in relation to track made good and not immediate heading. Bad luck in a 50 or 100 kt wind.
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 09:10
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: France
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NDB good points

Tinstaafl:

I agree with you, not only does it always point to the beacon but in some countries the NDB is at the inner locator position at the end of the runway so it is saying " look here is the end of the runway,dumb dumb."

Rgds

Tmb
Tmbstory is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 14:34
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The cloud
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just turn the fmc to select fms or vor and it can show bearing too...

Rmi's also have a vor needle

gps can also change track to relative bearing - track made good - track required or even distance off track - and that's just the old garmin 100's

the worst approach ever is Darwin locator with thunderstorms all around typical tropical bs - it's already a bananna curve approach that can see you almost a mile outise of the intended splay let alone the allowable 5 degrees and the errors of passing weather. Lucky there aren't any high rises or towers between hws and dw or out over the coast...

Hurry up and decommision them I say...

Mind you there is something satisfying about doing a night circling ndb reversal with strong wind on those rare occasions you get the needle to just sit and obey your evey command ... About that time I wake up fro my dream though and realise oh yeah it's notamed u/s no wonder I didn't hear audio ...

Oops

cheers
r
Xcel is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.