Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Thunderstorm chaos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Dec 2010, 03:18
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Further away
Posts: 952
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Trent
Are you on holidays with nothing else to do?
I don't work for JC so how would I know.
megle2 is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2010, 03:50
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: melb
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
..........hey 'jaba' I know they are mostly 'tin' as you say it was said with more tongue in cheek as most see the home builts as made of plastic, fiberglass, foam & wood etc (like my toy planes) hence the 'stigma' attached from days gone by/bye/bi:-)


Wmk2
Wally Mk2 is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2010, 04:23
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia, maybe
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are you on holidays with nothing else to do?
Yep, school finished 2 weeks ago.



2 'River Track' arrivals 20 minutes prior



Looked a completely normal visual approach pretty well by the river track.
I don't think so
Trent 972 is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2010, 06:15
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is no river track from the south, so QFA 126 didn't fly that arrival. The visial approach from the south takes you just to the left of the Gateway (overlfying Cannon Hill) turning final the Gateway.

The last pic of QFA126s track looks like he started out on the ILS and then tracked to the north to miss the weather and carried out a visual approach from the north.

Last edited by GAFA; 17th Dec 2010 at 06:56.
GAFA is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2010, 09:48
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Further away
Posts: 952
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
No one said he "flew the river track" rather he flew "pretty well" the river track, meaning he was close by, ok.
megle2 is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2010, 11:07
  #46 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Lightbulb

I wonder if we can do a BUMET weather radar overlay for roughly the same time (it'll be up to plus or minus six minutes I presume). That would certainly be interesting.

He's well inside the river track. Even allowing for some lateral error on the web track he's probably still well inside it. The go around (can someone occur that's what actually happened?) looks like it may have been due to not being lined up with final by 500'.

Interesting.
Keg is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2010, 05:52
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia, maybe
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stallies questions interested me to look a little further.
You don't know how accurate the position is laterally
(all of these can be verified by listening to the ATC tape link - 3.6 mb)

At 05.05 local time, Rescue 500 lifted of the Jackson Oval on Russell Island (20nm from YBBN) with a med 1 for the PA Hospital.

Lateral position accuracy - check

You don't know how accurate the altitude figures are
The next radio call after QF126 GoAround, report was Rescue500 maintaining 1,500ft. (450 m)


Altitude accuracy - check

You don't know the refresh rates
4 seconds, you can time them yourself

You don't know what the crew could see out the window
5 minutes before the GoAround, ATC broadcasted a TS warning "3nm to the east and south" and again as QF126 approached 1,000feet "it's coming down right overhead from south east to northeast and it's at the boundary of the airfield now" Listen to the first 5 minutes of Kegs tape link.
You don't know what kind of instrument approach (if any) was flown
Obviously a Visual Approach, because there is no instrument approach within a Bulls Roar of the track flown by QF126

You don't know the airline's procedures
Correct - But I question any procedure that has the aircraft not 'stable' till 200ft.

Save the approach stuffup analysis for a FOQA analysis or equivalent
Jetconnect, whilst being a wholly owned subsidiary of QANTAS, has a NZ AOC. Will, what would have rang alarm bells loudly in the QF mainline FOQA protocols, ever see the light of day with Jetconnect? I don't know but I've put it on here with only info available in the public domain. It's up to you whether you care enough about what went on.

Last edited by Trent 972; 20th Dec 2010 at 10:13.
Trent 972 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.