Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Pilot makes emergency landing on road

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Pilot makes emergency landing on road

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Jul 2009, 07:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: I fly because it releases my mind from the tyranny of petty things
Age: 52
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pilot makes emergency landing on road

A LIGHT plane has made an emergency landing on a highway in rural NSW.
Minutes after taking off from Hillston, in the state's west at about 2.30pm (AEST) , the twin-engined Cessna carrying a pilot and two passengers was forced to land about 10km north of the town on Kidman Way.
"The plane landed without problems. However, fuel was seen leaking from the aircraft after landing," police said in a statement.
"One lane of the highway was blocked but traffic was able to move around the aircraft."
There are no reports of injuries as a result of the emergency landing.


Twin Engined - Interesting.
av8trflying is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2009, 07:53
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: nocte volant
Posts: 1,114
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hilston, at least there would be no worries finding a spot to land
Trojan1981 is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2009, 09:56
  #3 (permalink)  
tmpffisch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a


VH-NFW Cessna 337 by the looks of the pic. I don't know much about Push/Pull, any reason why a single engine failure would result in not being able to maintain height? (or lack of undercarriage?)
 
Old 10th Jul 2009, 10:33
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sydney NSW Australia
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"The plane landed without problems. However


gear up alone is enough of a problem...
Ultralights is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2009, 10:45
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 74
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Front engine failure is more of a problem than rear engine failure
Arnold E is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2009, 13:11
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Someone forgot their BUMFISH checks
FL170 is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2009, 13:24
  #7 (permalink)  
Bugsmasherdriverandjediknite
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bai, mi go long hap na kisim sampla samting.
Posts: 2,849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The older 337s had the hydrolic pump on the front engine. probably the reason for the gear up. is definitely better to lose the front engine than the back. they push better than they pull.
the wizard of auz is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2009, 23:56
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From my memory, the C337 had better performance on the rear engine than the front engine, by about 150 ft/min.

If an engine failed prior to gear retraction, the U/c was left down, as the drag of the gear doors opening reduced the s/e rate of climb to minus 250 ft/min.

From the photo, I see that the gear is retracted, which if retracted during the engine failure would have no doubt contributed to the road landing.

It was always interesting endorsing people who had other conventional twins experience, the need to get the gear up with a engine failure was ingrained.
Dog One is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.