Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Overwing exits

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Jun 2008, 06:36
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Overwing exits

Hi all

I've just been doing a bit of paxing on 2 holers. The nice people at check in gave me an overwing exit each time and the CC did everything right as far as the regs were concerned, including a very thorough briefing that even an EP instructor would have been proud of.

However on each occasion the other pax at the exits were drinking alchohol on board ,which made me wonder. If even the cleaner is to be tested for drugs and alcohol , how is it that passengers in control of an over wing exit are not covered by these rules. I suspect a drunk pax opening a door on the fire side of a burning aircraft has the potential to do more harm than a cleaner who doesnt clean the back of a set properly???

Wunwing
Wunwing is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2008, 06:39
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank GOD you were there.
SeldomFixit is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2008, 06:55
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Boston
Age: 76
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Denny Crane
Denny Crane is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2008, 10:43
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just like to add at QF Pax seated at the overwing exits are entitled to drink alcohol provided responsible service of alcohol is followed. So not an oversight if this was the airline in question.
browni 44 is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2008, 12:16
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My point is that it appears that the overwing pax are not covered by the alcohol rule when they are in a position to do damage, but a cleaner etc who can do little damage are fully covered under the new rules. Which just seems to indicate that the new drug rules have not been thought out very well.

Wunwing
Wunwing is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2008, 12:50
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: turn L @ Taupo, just past the Niagra Falls...
Posts: 596
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gawd, I was trying so hard to stay out of this nonsense...

wunwing: it's pretty apparent to me (should be to you also) that the cleaner you cite in your example whilst on-board the aircraft in the course of their duties, is at work, and is as such subject to all the rules and conditions in the OH&S act amongst others. They further have a duty of care to present at their place of work "free from the effects of alcohol or other drugs" -or whatever phraseology is currently in use.

The passenger occupying the seat adjacent to an over-wing exit however, is not.

Can we please put this puerile discussion to bed now???
RadioSaigon is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2008, 22:08
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 360
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ok I'll bite.

I think the regulations that allow pax to operate emergency exit door's as a matter of normal procedures leave a great deal to be desired.

Example 1 On a flight OOL to ADL I had a number of members of a bike gang who with their new founded wealth were able to purchase seats anywhere on the a/c - specifically the emergency exit rows. In addition to making absolute tossers of themselves two had to be physically shaken to wake them up after the complete a/c had been unloaded.

Example 2 Sitting next to a pax in an emergency exit row the F/A dutifully went through the CASA approved briefing.
Are there any questions she asked?
Are you willing to assist in an emergency?
'YES' was the confident answer knowing that a NO would send him spiraling into the abyss of the rear of the aircraft to an alternative seat
As the F/A left he looked to me and said "what was the bit about a fire or flames outside".............

Jesus Wept!

For all those who think even a sober passenger is not going to do anything except pull the handle and GTFO then more fool you.

CASA has caved in to affordable safety and the demands of the Airlines.
Passenger safety is the looser!

Whilst flying for a 'third world airline' it was our POLICY to sit an F/A in the emergency exit row at all times to control the passengers in an emergency.

First world airlines could learn a few things!

Have I raised my concerns with my company - Yes
Have I raised my concerns with CASA - Yes
Have I raised my concerns with my union - Yes

Its a great shame that when a safety issue is raised within this so called professional forum it is so easily dragged into the gutter with such ease.

"Puerile nonsense"...depends where you’re sitting! (and possibly what your reading)

Have a good day

Last edited by ad-astra; 22nd Jun 2008 at 07:16.
ad-astra is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2008, 22:16
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tallong NSW
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with wunwing on this. I'm old. Everytime I've bought the exit row seat on Virgin no-one has queried that. If there was an emergency I'll be the body on the floor with a hundred sets of foot prints in it, because it would take me a minute to get out on my bleein' own.

So while wunwing is right, being told some day soon yer too old piss off is not going to make me happy.
denabol is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2008, 01:03
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tallong NSW
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That was the case with me. Plus a proper briefing in the seat for me and others in same row. Maybe being old but looking like I don't take no for an answer is the trick. I do understand what I'm supposed to do, but ending up in the carpet as a burned trampled crisp is not how I want it to end, so it might be time to book elsewhere.

After following some of the topics here you'd have to believe the Virgins are going out of business, Qantas will either be off the route or on the ground waiting for repairs, or it will be all Jetstar. I'd die in a ditch before flying Jetstar.
denabol is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.