Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Alternate aerodrome navaids

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Apr 2008, 08:14
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Melb
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Alternate aerodrome navaids

Been away from flying for a while so just have a couple of quick questions...

I'm flying a day IFR charter to an aerodrome which only has an NDB. My aircraft is only fitted with one ADF, therefore I need to nominate an alternate. Am i correct in saying that the alternate can not be another aerodrome with a single NDB (and no other aids)?

What about if the original destination has a GPS NPA and my aircraft is fitted with a TSO129 GPS, plus pilot qualified for the approach? Do I still need to nominate an alternate due to having only one ADF?

Any references for the above answers would be appreciated too.

Thanks
NK.
Navajo King is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2008, 08:37
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Port Macquarie
Age: 40
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just off the top of my head, i would think the alternate aerodrome would need to have 2 NDBs on the ground as you must be able to carry out an instrument approach if one of the ground stations were to fail.

and GPS cannot be considered in flight planning unless it is certified to TSO-145 (a) or 146 (a) so an alternate would be required because you only have 1 aid (the ADF) and IFR charter requires 2 either in the a/c or on the ground

Hope that helps.
Awnick is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2008, 09:43
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Port Macquarie
Age: 40
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but was it correct twaddle ...
Awnick is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2008, 11:26
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Qld troppo
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm flying a day IFR charter to an aerodrome which only has an NDB. My aircraft is only fitted with one ADF, therefore I need to nominate an alternate.
"a flight may be planned under the IFR by day to a destination aerodrome which is not served by a radio navigation aid without the requirement to provide for a suitable alternate aerodrome, provided that:

a. not more than SCT cloud is forecast below the final route segment LSALT plus 500 ft and forecast visibility at the destination aerodrome is not less than 8 km; and

b. the aircraft can be navigated to the destination aerodrome in accordance with General Flight Procedures, paragraph 5.1"

If the flight is to an aerodrome that only has an NDB, then that aerodrome is going to be in non-CTA ( I can't think of any aerodrome in CTA that only has an NDB), so

by my Jepp

"CHTR/AWK 5700kg or less MTOW in non-CTA - 1 system required - ADF or VOR or GNSS-C145/6a"

if your destination aerodrome was in CTA

"CHTR/AWK 5700kg or less MTOW in CTA - 2 systems required - ADF or VOR or DME or GPS (ie min TSO C129)"

What about if the original destination has a GPS NPA and my aircraft is fitted with a TSO129 GPS, plus pilot qualified for the approach? Do I still need to nominate an alternate due to having only one ADF?
Nope - see Jepp General Flight Procedures 5.11 Radio Navigation Systems

Dr

Last edited by ForkTailedDrKiller; 23rd Apr 2008 at 11:42.
ForkTailedDrKiller is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2008, 11:45
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: CASEY STATION
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Awnick,

The Dr forgot to answer your last question. Yes complete and incorrect twaddle. I cant think of any airports in Australia that are equipped with dual NDB ground stations. I think you are referring to the alternate requirement that says two ADF fitted in the aircraft capable of using a single NDB ground station. Also last time I flew in Aus (which was a couple of years ago) we flight planned and used a TSO-C129 certified GPS for primary means enroute navigation and RNAV GNSS approaches. Unless things have changed (in last 2 years) GPS equipment cannot be used to safisfy any alternate criteria though.

So to answer the original question, alternate is required unless the weather is better than quoted by the Dr.
RUMBEAR is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2008, 01:01
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Orstralia
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't think of any aerodrome in CTA that only has an NDB
...besides Moorabbin, Jandakot, Bankstown, Parafield...

Back to PA31_King's first question, AIP ENR 1-1 73.1.2:
When a flight is required to provide for an alternate aerodrome, any aerodrome may be so nominated for that flight provided:
a. it is suitable as a destination for that flight; and
b. is not an aerodrome for which that flight would require to provide for an alternate aerodrome.


You only need the alternate if you will be IFR on the last leg, as the good Dr. says, (ENR 1-1 73.3). The aerodrome with only an NDB can't be an alternate, UNLESS you can get there without proceeding IFR on the last leg.
jumpuFOKKERjump is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2008, 01:26
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NQLD
Age: 38
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
In simple terms...

Flying charter under IFR you need to be able to suffer the loss of one airborne aid and still be able to carry out an approach.

Unless...

The weather is:
Cloud: no more than SCT below 500ft above route LSALT
Vis: not less than 8km

Otherwise you need an aid!

Simple rule:
Two in the air - one on the ground
One of each in the air - One of each on the ground
aviation_enthus is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2008, 11:52
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Up yer nose, again.
Age: 67
Posts: 1,240
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
I can't think of any aerodrome in CTA that only has an NDB

...besides Moorabbin, Jandakot, Bankstown, Parafield...

Parafield and Jandakot also both have VOR approaches available based on Adelaide and Perth located aids.
Peter Fanelli is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2008, 07:51
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: canoz
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
may help to think about it from the point of view that the alternate itself cannot require an alternate.

There is one exception, and thats regarding the PAL and a responsible person, but that's another story!
insertnamehere is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.