Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Friday Night Trivia Smart Minds Required

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Friday Night Trivia Smart Minds Required

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Apr 2008, 05:49
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: VXXX
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Grrr Friday Night Trivia Smart Minds Required



So,

1. Flight Computer, dH 10,000 (175IAS = 203TAS)

Air Specific Range is not Ground Specific Range so we should not deduct the headwind and should use the TAS

20usg x 2.72 = 54.4kg

54.4 divided by 203 = .27kg/nm


The answer is not given by the examiner, so I am confused.

Why did they mark me wrong?
ksa5223 is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2008, 05:59
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Mental maths only here.......I think its the 0.31......

Try asking someone who knows though!

J
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2008, 06:48
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Qld troppo
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
An aircraft cruising at 10000ft density height in a 20 kt headwind has an indicated airspeed of 175 kts
I guess its a Bonanza, huh!

Dr
ForkTailedDrKiller is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2008, 07:34
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YMML
Posts: 2,564
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
ksa5223, I had to go back to make sure.

SPECIFIC AIR RANGE = FF/TAS kg/nm

So , as far as I can tell, your calcs are correct.

0.27kg/nm

Specific Ground Range takes into account W/V
using GS of 183kts gives and SGR of 0.2972kg/nm closer to 0.29 than 0.31.

What does your KDR say? Using your figures, I would take it up with your flight test ATO on the day and see what they say.
OZBUSDRIVER is online now  
Old 11th Apr 2008, 08:02
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wherever the hotel drink ticket is valid
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question doesn't specify AVGAS or AVTUR. I assume the 2.72 factor you're using is USG to KG of AVGAS?

I can't remember all the numbers but using 3.8 USG/Ltr and 0.81 kg/Ltr (AVTUR) I get a conversion closer to 3, resulting in an answer closer to 0.31kg/nm.

Can't tell you how many KDRs I've had from answers that could not possibly have been wrong, but don't bother taking it up with them as I;ve never had a response. You'd like to think you get what you pay for!
Icarus53 is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2008, 08:34
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ye if it's an ATPL examination then im guessing the conversion will be different, and thus what he said above
alexthepilot is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2008, 09:23
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: VXXX
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ozbusdriver

thanks oz

yes it is a cpl level question and it's avgas.

I think i am correct and it may well be a database error as its an online marking website :-)
ksa5223 is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2008, 09:43
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Around
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And therin lies the problem with the current system..... minnimal feedback (KDR) and your left guessing why you got it wrong (if in fact you did get it wrong).
Kenneth is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.