Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Caravan engine failure in TSV

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Feb 2008, 00:21
  #101 (permalink)  
Man Bilong Balus long PNG
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back in Japan, flying the Glider Tug, eating great Japanese food, looking at lovely Japanese Ladies and continuing the neverending search for a bad bottle of Red.
Posts: 2,984
Received 111 Likes on 64 Posts
Devil

Slight thread drift!

there is no better way to go than in a Bonanza!
Forky, I would tend to disagree!! In a horizontal position with a smile on your face, as per a few late politicians I could name (but won't!) would be preferable!!

Sorry Taily, Much ado, Tid et al. Could'nt resist it.
Pinky the pilot is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2008, 01:03
  #102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
......ah Dr my learned friend, 'twill be a sad day when the Bo takes you places that you don't want to go !! the chances of having a total eng failure are slim (as you have demostrated) & it's all about personal risk. I wouldn't purposely fly IFR in IMC @ NGT in a SE but many do (obviously). If I remember further to that V tail that went in as I mentioned before here the crankshaft broke, i could be wrong as it was a long time ago so no amount of maint will avoid such rare happenings!
I won't be saying "I told ya so" if it ever happens I'll be sadened as PPRUNE needs a Dr every now & then !......ahhhh look you ain't going anywhere & neither am I, we have much to do here like keeping the youngin's on their low experienced toes !

This extention to this thread might seem odd but do they make those balistic chutes for A/C as heavy as the Bo? I guess 3X on a space capsule worked, might need about 6 on theh Bo though with all that fancy gear onbaord Dr `!

CW
Capt Wally is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2009, 08:39
  #103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Darwin, Australia
Age: 53
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
The ATSB report has released their report here 200800024 - it is quite an interesting read / look.

The amount of destruction caused following the fatigue failure of one CT blade is an eye opener - especially considering the failure occurred only 215 hours after a HSI, and only 2,007 hours after an overhaul where all the CT blades were replaced with new ones.
werbil is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.