Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

And we wonder why.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Dec 2007, 21:03
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
And we wonder why.....

From Avweb

The parents of a skydiver killed in the crash of a Cessna Grand Caravan in October are suing Cessna claiming the aircraft was defective and shouldn’t have been flying in icing conditions. Bryan Jones was among 10 who died in the crash in the Cascade Mountains ...
Tell me they are joking! Like that was Cessna's fault. Any wonder you pay 50% for the plane or part and 50% to insurance companies & lawyers to fight off stupid claims like this.

J
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2007, 21:21
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.....jaba in the land of the "fee" anything is possible sadly when it comes to getting some sort of conpensation. And sadly that's all it really is after the event, compensation, 'cause it ain't gunna do the poor hapless pax any good now !
I can remember reading somewhere some years ago with a non aviation related incident involving stupidity at it's best. A woman in a supermarket in the land of the 'fee' (USA) was shopping with a young child whom grabbed a bottle of liquid & dropped it on the floor spilling the contents everywhere. The mother then promptly slipped on the liquid & consequently sued the supermarket!. She won if I remember correctly !

Also (sorry for diverting fm the original thread but the wx is bad !) anyone remember that accident where a guy bought a new Winnabago & sued for damages & won $millions I might add because he set the crusie control of the vehical on a public hwy then promptly got out of the drivers seat to make a coffee !!!!!!.......His lawyers claimed that there was no specific mention in the owners manual as to 'not' leave the drivers seat during cruise control ops !! That's one very slim grey area indeed !

Let's trust that sanity will prevail here if there is no fault found of the Cessna for the good of common sense.

Capt Wally :P-)
Capt Wally is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2007, 21:46
  #3 (permalink)  
When you live....
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: 0.0221 DME Keyboard
Posts: 985
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts
Normally.....

..... I would agree with you but in this case there are known/repeated issues with C208s flight in to known icing. Someone will correct me I'm sure but I have a feeling certification for flight into known icing was pulled in Canada after a spate of accidents?

That Cessna haven't taken action to address the issue would seem to be at the centre of this lawsuit.

UTR
UnderneathTheRadar is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2007, 22:26
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YMML
Posts: 2,564
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
It never is the fault of the dirt darts wanting to be flown into known icing conditions.

Regardless if the aircraft is or was certified. Does this still allow jumping operations into what would be marginal vis wx for a drop?
OZBUSDRIVER is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2007, 22:47
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There was no "jumping" on this day or in these conditions. It was a repositioning flight where it seems the aircraft flew into terrain in bad weather.
VH-XXX is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2007, 23:27
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Permanently lost
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You have to understand the US litigation scene which to a large extent is being followed in Australia.

First rule: Follow the money. There is no use sueing someone who hasn't a brass razoo to their name. Who has insurance cover? The aircraft manufacturer.

Second rule: Spin a heart-breaking tale to a jury about the agony of the loss and the lives ruined.

Jury puts 1 and 2 together and says, ".....we'll its really the insurance company that has to pay so we will award damages."

Little wonder Cessna got out of single engine piston aircraft until product liability legislation was introduced. Now it looks as though the Caravan is the target. Look for price rises in the future.
PLovett is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2007, 10:02
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Still in Paradise
Age: 61
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
....or the woman in the US who spilled coffee in her lap in the Mucdonalds drive-thru, and sued same because coffee was hot - and won. Thus we now see 'Caution - contents may be hot' on coffee and food containers.
Jamair is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2007, 10:08
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Perth
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Americans are idiots. There should be a law against them.
Zhaadum is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2007, 01:09
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Alice Springs
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Insurance companies love it!!!!

At first glance the solution is not to have insurance, and then you will not be sued because there is no money to get. But then the people you deal with know that they will be the target so they insist you buy insurance to protect them.
It all drives up the cost, and encourages stupid legal things. A self perpetuating stupidity.
bushy is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2007, 04:47
  #10 (permalink)  
Man Bilong Balus long PNG
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back in Japan, flying the Glider Tug, eating great Japanese food, looking at lovely Japanese Ladies and continuing the neverending search for a bad bottle of Red.
Posts: 2,984
Received 111 Likes on 64 Posts
Devil

Did'nt William Shakespeare say in one of his plays something along the lines of;
Come the revolution, first shoot all the Lawyers!
Pinky the pilot is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2007, 07:20
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: somewhere in Oz
Age: 54
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think UTR has hit the nail on the head, however it still astounds me the level of engineering certainty that is found within the courtroom that never seems to reveal itself in the real world.

A
Andy_RR is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2007, 11:55
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 3,114
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
....or the woman in the US who spilled coffee in her lap in the Mucdonalds drive-thru, and sued same because coffee was hot - and won. Thus we now see 'Caution - contents may be hot' on coffee and food containers.
You should do a bit of research on that one. It sounds great as a sound bite like you've got there (word bite?) but the coffee produced by McDs at the time was genuinly too hot and they knew it, but wouldn't change it. Too hot as in can't drink it and it physically burns you if you spill it on yourself.
AerocatS2A is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2007, 20:07
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 91 Likes on 34 Posts
Jamair, Mc Donalds control every phase of their operations including the temperature of the coffee to the nearest degree.

They had had previous scalding incidents.

They had been repeatedly warned about the danger.

They refused point blank to do anything about the danger even though they had more than enough cold hard concrete evidence that it existed....

They were sued for negligence, and quite rightly lost the case.

Just try pouring almost boiling coffee into your lap and see what it feels like..



PLovett has it right... because the USA has a rotten social services infrastructure and a broken and highly expensive health care system, an accident can literally mean that your family becomes destitute and your children don't get educated at all. Your only remedy in the event of even the smallest accident is to sue, and the trick is to look for the player who has the most money - usually the manufacturer.

Thats why you see asinine warnings written all over American products.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2007, 01:27
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Wanna Be Up There...
Age: 53
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There is a website from the USA which holds "Stella Awards" for rediculous law suits. The link is http://www.stellaawards.com

By the way, the one about the Winnebago driver and the cruise control is an urban legend / web myth. the real ones are stupid enough without needing inventions.
notmyC150v2 is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2007, 05:16
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Permanently lost
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At first glance the solution is not to have insurance, and then you will not be sued because there is no money to get. But then the people you deal with know that they will be the target so they insist you buy insurance to protect them.
It all drives up the cost, and encourages stupid legal things. A self perpetuating stupidity.
bushy, when next we meet remind me to tell you the story of one of my clients who was interested in sky diving so the local jump site (in your neck of the woods) put a parachute on him and put him in the back of the plane as an observer only.

Due to non-compliance with regulations the seat rails had not been taped over so that after the parachutists had exited the aircraft my client crawled across the floor to a better sitting position. A seat rail snagged the parachute release. It went out the open door followed by my still attached client. He hit the tail plane of the aircraft on the way past. The chute opened but my client was unconscious when he hit the ground.

His injuries to his head and face were devastating. He lived in a world of pain thereafter. My client sued the jump site operator, the pilot and the aircraft owner who had leased the aircraft to the jump site.The jump site operator didn't have insurance. The pilot didn't have insurance. The aircraft owner did. My client won his case against all parties and was awarded substantial damages. The insurance company refused to honour the contract as the aircraft had not been insured as a jump aircraft nor was it being operated in accordance with the relevant regulations.

I represented this man on other matters while he was still fighting to get the insurance company to pay up. The case was being fought all the way to the High Court where it was waiting to be heard. In the end it all became too much and he took his own life rather than continue with his appalling life that he had been reduced to.

Always have insurance when you deal with the public.

Sorry for the thread drift.
PLovett is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2007, 06:27
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In Frozen Chunks (Cloud Cuckoo Land)
Age: 17
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post
Imagine ordering a coffee and expecting it not to be hot or boiling.

I dont know about you, but when i make a cup of tea or coffee, I usually boil a kettle - and as far as I can tell it gets pretty close to boiling hot.
blueloo is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2007, 09:13
  #17 (permalink)  
ABX
AustralianMade
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Out in the weather!
Age: 54
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I dont know about you, but when i make a cup of tea or coffee, I usually boil a kettle - and as far as I can tell it gets pretty close to boiling hot.
Far too much common sense in that one bluey.

...but hang on, it ain't too 'common' anymore is it?

I blame the pollies who have tried to legislate common sense into mere words in the Australian legislature. Due, of course, to the money grabbing lawyers who drove them to it.
ABX is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2007, 12:31
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Up yer nose, again.
Age: 67
Posts: 1,240
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
And yet another C208 has crashed in icing conditions in Ohio in the last 12 hours or so.
Peter Fanelli is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2007, 21:06
  #19 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Should I rename this thread the C208 crashing in icing thread.......

Peter and any C208 drivers....hang on I know one well maybe I should ask him....not much ice up here though.....

WHAT is the C208 POH saying about flight into icing conditions?

What are the most common causes for C208 prangs in the USA? I see there have been many and maybe night freighters, is it icing, or rogues cutting corners till it bites them?

The plane seems quite a good machine, the PT6 a reliable engine if maintained properly.....what is the scoop?

Just some rough stats....of say 1500 produced about 10% crashed. At random quite a few seem to be weather related. Maybe pilots thinking is more an all weather a/c like a 737 than a single under 5700kg.

J
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2007, 21:48
  #20 (permalink)  
Sprucegoose
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 60
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I don't 'wonder why', I just read the 'right to bare arms' thread in JB and realise that where Americans are concerned, these things are inevitable...
Howard Hughes is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.