****su Tonka
OOOOHHH , Go'on.......
G'day S/T........For '****'s' sake.......don't giveup NOW...........
It is just gettin' interestin'.........
Anyhow......have ENJOYED yr posts..........yr know the abrev's......and 'The System'.......I don't give a R-ts Ar-e who knows who I am...........
But then, I am now on 'The Outside' lookin' In'............
'Tis farr farr better this way...
Keepup the good work........
We ALL NEED the intel...............
How about ''Mickey Mouse'?..............
And, if'n ya ever wanna respond by Pvt e/m,...Just Do It!....
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: with the porangi,s in Pohara
Age: 66
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
S-T....enjoyed your posts as well ....,but now that youve seen fit to spit the dummy.....do me a favour and take Pretty-boy,Pete Conrad with you.....PB
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I reckon S-T is actually Maxine McKew.
(S)he won't have time to post while trying to unseat the Prime Minister.
See you after the election ****su - hope you get more votes in Bennelong than Andrew Wilkie did!
SW
(S)he won't have time to post while trying to unseat the Prime Minister.
See you after the election ****su - hope you get more votes in Bennelong than Andrew Wilkie did!
SW
Metrosexual
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Enroute
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Surely that organisation would not restrict your career advancement if they knew who you were, and surely your genuinely held views in relation to aviation safety should not need to be hidden behind a pseudonym? Or is there a reason you need to remain hidden that I do not understand?
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Springfield
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
S-T's management have threatened all staff with dismissal for posting on pprune, and used as an example an employee of an industry regulator who was sued by a colourful multi-millionaire businessman. A local ANSP doesn't want the same exposure and have directed staff accordingly.
Fortunately, ****su works for a company with more than 100 employees, thereby still covered to a limited extent by unfair dismissal legislation (At least until the next Coalition installment of workchoices). The same couldn't be said for professional pilots not working for the majors.
Fortunately, ****su works for a company with more than 100 employees, thereby still covered to a limited extent by unfair dismissal legislation (At least until the next Coalition installment of workchoices). The same couldn't be said for professional pilots not working for the majors.
Bugger. One less to help keep the bastards honest.
