Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Czech Evektor EV-55.....a Chieftain replacement???

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Czech Evektor EV-55.....a Chieftain replacement???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Jan 2007, 10:38
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Oz
Posts: 910
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Czech Evektor EV-55.....a Chieftain replacement???

Just found out about an interesting 10 seat aircraft that nay be built in Canada, 10 seats, high wing, podded landing gear, much like a small ATR. Powered by 2 x 550 PT6 turbo props. Anyone seen anything of this aircraft. Could this be the much awaited Chieftain replacement/mini airliner.

Dubious about the powerplant tho, surely a 500 hp version of Centurions V8 diesel would be a goer.
nomorecatering is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2007, 10:53
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone got a photo?

Aussie
Aussie is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2007, 10:58
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Oz
Posts: 910
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Dont know how to post a photo but their website is

http://www.evektor.cz/ev-55/
nomorecatering is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2007, 11:07
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: west
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Your right the V8s are the way to go and cheaper to run.
Green gorilla is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2007, 11:42
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Alice Springs
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks good

This looks good, but more data is needed. It will be interesting to see if CASA permits anything to compete with the caravan.
bushy is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2007, 11:51
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Oz
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like a cross between a Moo2 and a Do228
yowie is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2007, 11:57
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 288
Received 142 Likes on 39 Posts
dont ask me to get out of that thing in a hurry through the portside door with #1 still turning
das Uber Soldat is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2007, 17:28
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wherever I Lay my Hat...
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nomorecatering
Dubious about the powerplant tho, surely a 500 hp version of Centurions V8 diesel would be a goer.
Why? Surely a gas turbine is going to be better (lighter, quieter, more fuel-efficient, smaller) than even the best a reciprocator can offer! From the company's own blurb...
  • Powerful airplane - reliable and well-proven turboprop engine \
  • Fast airplane - max. level speed over 220 kts
  • Environment-friendly aircraft - minimal impact on environment
Looks like a potentially useful airframe for high-density short-haul ops -the float ver looks a tad daggy tho
kiwiblue is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2007, 19:31
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Queensland
Posts: 2,422
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
I am yet to see any twin turbine aircraft make economic sense in general charter and low capacity RPT with less than 16 - 18 seats.

Payload over 800 nm is less than a C208 Caravan. At max fuel the aircraft appears to have a payload of only 200 to 300 kg???

Fitting V8 engines may appear to make economic sense but their added weight (over PT6A-21s, approx 140 kg each) would further reduce payload. (Why choose -21s over the superior -112/-114 engine or lower cost Walter 601 turbines???)

Stretched to 18 - 20 seats with PT6A-34 or -42 engines, the aircraft may start to make economic sense, although I am not sure it would compete with similar size pressurised aircraft.

It is a concept aircraft only, which may never see the light of day.
Torres is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2007, 20:17
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: west
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AS from memory the Noranda V8s they played with about 10 years ago put out as much power as the Pt6 with reduced fuel consumption and the setup carried less fuel then the standard aircraft they had them fitted to a C90 King Air.
Green gorilla is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2007, 20:46
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 91 Likes on 34 Posts
If the quality and finish is as good as the Sportstar, they should be a joy to fly.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2007, 20:50
  #12 (permalink)  
sir.pratt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
8000hr tbo on the pt6. 2000 on the walter (then throw it away), 2500? on the v8. for high use (2000+ hrs/year) if you ran say 10-15 aircraft, you would ALWAYS be doing engine changes on anything less than the pt6
 
Old 15th Jan 2007, 21:03
  #13 (permalink)  
Silly Old Git
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: saiba spes
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
How about a QueenAir fitted with a cuppla Chrysler V-10s?
Short exhaust stubs of course.
tinpis is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2007, 21:12
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Queensland
Posts: 2,422
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Sir Pratt. Walter claim "TBO options of ..... 3000 hour/6600 cycles depending on the ordered configuration" and no HSI?

But the big difference is cost. An operator can do a heap of engine changes for the difference in cost between a -21 HSIs plus overhaul and a new exchange Walter engine.

But you're correct - in their class, nothing beats a PT6 - or JT15, or PW100 - but then, I'm biased!

I can't see the economics in this concept aircraft. Two thirds of a Bandeirante with negligible long range payload, for many times the capital cost and probably similar operating costs. The western world has moved on beyond this class of aircraft.

bushy. What makes you think CASA are pro C208?
Torres is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2007, 21:49
  #15 (permalink)  
sir.pratt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
15 mpg @ 180kts = 48l/side/hr. cheaper than a cheiftan!
 
Old 15th Jan 2007, 23:02
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YMML
Posts: 2,564
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Always thought this was the niche that GAF was aiming at with the N24 Nomad. It would have been interesting to see what the gonad would have turned into if they ditched the helicopter engines and fitted PT6s and moded the the tail to a T-tail configuration.

Twotters are back in production as well.
OZBUSDRIVER is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2007, 23:08
  #17 (permalink)  
Silly Old Git
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: saiba spes
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
It would have been interesting to see what the gonad would have turned into if they ditched the helicopter engines and fitted PT6s and moded the the tail to a T-tail configuration.
Speaking as an ex Gomad driver you would have got yourself a heap of **** with two good engines.
tinpis is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2007, 23:21
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YMML
Posts: 2,564
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
At least the idea was there for the gonad. Designed by commitee in the end methinks
OZBUSDRIVER is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2007, 23:45
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: west
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It may replace the piston twins around but 1.5 mil its steep plus as the mines start to move onto bigger things i think its to late if it was tryed maybe 15 yrs ago it may have had a chance.
Green gorilla is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.