Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

work wanted 747-400 lame

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Feb 2006, 07:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Danger work wanted 747-400 lame

by now we have all seen the start of the demise of a once proud institution that was qf engineering.good old Geoff has started with his virtual airline plans and who suffers but the mouths of babes under the heavy maint lames it is so cost effective to offshore maint to a mro maybe its time the shareholders thought of off-shoring the board to china as well,im sure they could get a CEO on half the rate
chemical alli is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2006, 07:40
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: sydney, australia
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Half the rate?
I'd have a go for 20% of what he's on.
If I effed it up I'd get a good bonus too.
And It seems like I might have a bit of spare time on my hands soon.
Turbo 5B is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2006, 09:27
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: australia
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dear mr Ali
I believe boeing are setting up a MRO in china they may require mechanics i believe the skilled rate is us$7,000 a year i also heard that china is training 15,000 aircraft mechanics a year (must know something) most china MRO'S are fully booked at the monent so you want to hurry your resume i assume you speak cantonese
domo is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2006, 10:07
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: sydney, australia
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Domo, do they need a CEO as well? I can suggest one.
Turbo 5B is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2006, 10:19
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: australia
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Turbo 5b
i dont need him too expensive, in china CEO us$10,000, hee no good no point cutting labor costs .labor cheep.as ac/dc say dirty deeds done dirth cheep
domo is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2006, 22:14
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: brisvegas
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Everyone keeps using Mr Dixons pay as an example of waste and inefficiency.

Now just hold on,
I'm sure he earns his $115,384.62 per fortnight base pay.

If we didn't pay so well at the top, how would we attract the talent? We need to offer management that much to remain competitive.

Workers, on the other hand, need to be paid less and less so that we can be competitive in a global market.

makes perfect sense to me.

Plainpilotdriver is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2006, 02:23
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: OZ.
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

Yes, you are being a little hard on poor old Geoff.
There are thousands of you workers to share the load, but he is all on his own.
planemad2 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.