Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

British planes...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Sep 2005, 02:36
  #21 (permalink)  

Don Quixote Impersonator
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Australia
Age: 77
Posts: 3,403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Lucas" aka, semi- affectionately as, "the makers of darkness".

Had one of them front wheel driven generators for the light on my two wheeler bike, you know the one that you used that dinky lever to get that little ribbed wheel to contact the tyre to spin the genny?

Care was required selecting it at any speed, lest the drag had you over the handlebars and if you weren't going downhill it required quite some effort to pedal against it. The "light" it produced was sufficient to see the front tyre but not much else and if you didn't carry spare globes.........don't remember ever using it in anger, now that I think about it.
gaunty is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2005, 02:50
  #22 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,231
Received 125 Likes on 78 Posts
(a) .. what's wrong with the Victa ? .. learnt to fly in that grossly underpowered beast ... ah ... three hours to climb to height ... five minutes aeros ... land .. refuel .... repeat exercise ...

(b) be aware that the 146 orginally started out as a twin but the engines didn't eventuate ... sat on the shelf for a while .. and then was resurrected when the little engines came onto the market ...
john_tullamarine is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2005, 03:04
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
John T, you are of course talking about the first production Airtourers with 100 ponies up front and not the later 115, 130, 150 and 160 HP with a CSU that go like er um ....................................... very well indeed.

Then again you couldn't possible be old enough to have flown the protoype (VH-FMM) with a neck snapping 65 horses under the bonnet, could you?

tipsy
tipsy is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2005, 03:11
  #24 (permalink)  
Silly Old Git
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: saiba spes
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Im certainly old enough to have flown a new 100 Victa
Bought as a replacement for aero clubs venerable tiggy moth.
Twernt bad on a cold day bit hard to get used to the bull in a china shop noise when you did a snap roll.
And the spin?
Gawd
tinpis is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2005, 03:43
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was told many moons ago that the best combination was an American airframe with a British engine.

Certainly the Merlin transformed the Mustang from mediocre to a classic and the Avon powered Sabre had quite a reputation too.
Bobster is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2005, 03:30
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Back again.
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the correction Feather.

Also thinking of an often used analogy to elaborate on the subject. The best farmer isn't necessarily the one who grows the best crop, but rather the one who best gets the crops from farm to market. The poms have never been good at that aspect and the Aussies have probably been worse.
Lodown is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2005, 08:40
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Dunnunda & Godzone
Age: 74
Posts: 4,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nothing wrong with the Victa, John, even the 100 HP RR version. We thought it was real flash after ab initio in a Chippie!

Which is probably why the Aussie Government wouldn't support it, forcing it's sale to the Kiwis, who promptly sold the CT4 back to Australia.

Can't have a successful Aussie aircraft in our history now can we?

Woomera is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2005, 20:09
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 91 Likes on 34 Posts
Woomera, the Victa sale was a result of what I call "received knowledge" in Government. This is a belief planted in the public service that certain truths exist - always self serving.

ie:

" There is only room for two car manufacturers in Australia" - justifies not helping anyone as they fail.

"Australia is uncompetitive in manufacturing anything, especially aircraft"

"There is only room for three publishing and broadcasting companies"

and of course my favourite one; "There is only room for one Australian international carrier - Qantas"
Sunfish is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2005, 22:59
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seoul/Gold Coast.....
Posts: 385
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
With regard to British Engines into U.S. airframes at least the reverse happened with The Heron (Dh-114) and the Riley conversion with IO-540's......
zlin77 is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2005, 00:26
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: back to the land of small pay and big bills
Age: 50
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why don't the Brits build Personal Computers?



Cause no one likes getting oil all over their desk tops!!
mattyj is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2005, 00:59
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Oz
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

The motto of the British Engineering Society:

"Why raise the bridge when you can lower the river???"

Macchi is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2005, 01:05
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The BN2: A superb short field machine...................that's horrible to fly.

One day a Mr Britten & a Mr Norman were having a conversation:

Mr B: Well, Norman, by the looks of things on these plans we've certainly achieved our goal of good short field aeroplane. What say we improve the ergonomics before we have to cut metal?

Mr N: Why?

Mr B: Yes. I see what you mean, old boy......
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2005, 01:36
  #33 (permalink)  
Silly Old Git
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: saiba spes
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
This should be known by heart now

Time for this again methinks




Britten-Norman BN2 XL

By a well-known ‘Flight magazine’.

Undaunted by technical realities, the design team at Pilatus Britten - Norman has announced plans for the BN2-XL, promising more noise, reduced payload, a lower cruise speed, and increased pilot workload.

We spoke to Mr. Fred Gribble, former British Rail boilermaker, and now Chief Project Engineer. Fred was responsible for developing many original and creative design flaws in the service of his former employer, and will be incorporating these in the new BN2-XL technology under a licensing agreement. Fred reassured BN-2 pilots, however, that all fundamental design flaws of the original model had been retained. Further good news is that the XL version is available as a retrofit.

Among the new measures is that of locking the ailerons in the central position, following airborne and simulator tests which showed that whilst pilots of average strength were able to achieve up to 30 degrees of control wheel deflection, this produced no appreciable variation in the net flight of the aircraft. Thus the removal of costly and unnecessary linkages has been possible, and the rudder has been nominated as the primary directional control. In keeping with this new philosophy, but to retain commonality for crews’ transitioning to the XL, additional resistance to foot pressure has been built in to the rudder pedals to prevent over-controlling in gusty conditions (defined as those in which wind velocity exceeds 3 knots).

An outstanding feature of Islander technology has always been the adaptation of the O-540 engine which, when mounted in any other aircraft in the free world (except the Trislander) is known for its low vibration levels. The Islander adaptations cause it to shake and batter the airframe, gradually crystallise the main spar, desynchronise the accompanying engine, and simulate the sound of fifty skeletons fornicating in an aluminium dustbin. PBN will not disclose the technology they applied in preserving this effect in the XL but Mr. Gribble assures us it will be perpetrated in later models and sees it as a strong selling point. "After all, the Concorde makes a lot of noise" he said, "and look how fast that goes."

However design documents clandestinely recovered from the PBN shredder have solved a question that has puzzled aerodynamicists and pilots for many years, disclosing that it is actually noise which causes the BN2 to fly. The vibration set up by the engines, and amplified by the airframe, in turn causes the air molecules above the wing to oscillate at atomic frequency, reducing their density and creating lift. This can be demonstrated by sudden closure of the throttles, which causes the aircraft to fall from the sky. As a result, lift is proportional to noise, rather than speed, explaining amongst other things the aircraft's remarkable takeoff performance.

In the driver's cab (as Gribble describes it) ergonomic measures will ensure that long-term PBN pilots' deafness does not cause in-flight dozing. Orthopaedic surgeons have designed a cockpit layout and seat to maximise backache, en-route insomnia, chronic irritability, and terminal (post-flight) lethargy. Redesigned "bullworker" elastic aileron cables, now disconnected from the control surfaces, increase pilot workload and fitness. Special noise retention cabin lining is an innovation on the XL, and it is hoped in later models to develop cabin noise to a level which will enable pilots to relate ear-pain directly to engine power, eliminating the need for engine instruments altogether.

We were offered an opportunity to fly the XL at Britten-Norman's development facility, adjacent to the British Rail tearooms at Little Chortling. (The flight was originally to have been conducted at the Pilatus plant but aircraft of BN design are now prohibited from operating in Swiss airspace during avalanche season). For our mission profile, the XL was loaded with coal for a standard 100 N.M. trip with British Rail reserves, carrying one pilot and nine passengers to maximise discomfort. Passenger loading is unchanged, the normal under-wing protrusions inflicting serious lacerations on 71% of boarding passengers, and there was the usual confusion in selecting a door appropriate to the allocated seat. The facility for the clothing of embarking passengers to remove oil slicks from engine cowls during loading has been thoughtfully retained.

Start-up is standard, and taxiing, as in the BN2 is accomplished by brute force. Takeoff calculations called for a 250-decibel power setting, and the rotation force for the (neutral) C of G was calculated at 180 ft/lbs. of backpressure.

Initial warning of an engine failure during takeoff is provided by a reduction in vibration of the flight instrument panel. Complete seizure of one engine is indicated by the momentary illusion that the engines have suddenly and inexplicably become synchronised. Otherwise, identification of the failed engine is achieved by comparing the vibration levels of the windows on either side of the cabin. (Relative passenger pallor has been found to be an unreliable guide on many BN2 routes because of ethnic consideration).

Shortly after takeoff the XL's chief test pilot, Capt. Mike "Muscles" Mulligan demonstrated the extent to which modern aeronautical design has left the BN2 untouched; he simulated pilot incapacitation by slumping forward onto the control column, simultaneously applying full right rudder and bleeding from the ears. The XL, like its predecessor, demonstrated total control rigidity and continued undisturbed. Power was then reduced to 249 decibels for cruise, and we carried out some comparisons of actual flight performance with graph predictions. At 5000 ft and ISA, we achieved a vibration amplitude of 500 CPS and 240 decibels, for a fuel flow of 210 lb/hr, making the BN2-XL the most efficient converter of fuel to noise after the Titan rocket.

Exploring the Constant noise/Variable noise concepts, we found that in a VNE dive, vibration reached its design maximum at 1000 CPS, at which point the limiting factor is the emulsification of human tissue. The catatonic condition of long-term BN2 pilots is attributed to this syndrome, which commences in the cerebral cortex and spreads outwards. We asked Capt. Mulligan what he considered the outstanding features of the XL. He cupped his hand behind his ear and shouted "Whazzat?"

We returned to Britten-Norman convinced that the XL model retains the marque's most memorable features, whilst showing some significant and worthwhile regressions.
PBN are not, however, resting on their laurels. Plans are already advanced for the Trislander XL and noise tunnel testing has commenced. The basis of preliminary design and performance specifications is that lift increases as the square of the noise, and as the principle of acoustic lift is further developed, a later five-engined vertical take-off model is also a possibility."

All in all, a wonderful aeroplane.
tinpis is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.