Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

2 Engines and 4 Engines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Aug 2004, 22:55
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Dunnunda & Godzone
Age: 74
Posts: 4,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, I think all that is what I meant...............

Interesting discussion!

Woomera
Woomera is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2004, 01:06
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Sydney
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just a quick, hypothetical question.

If the engines MUST meet required standards of SAY, 1 failure per 100,000 hours, and there are two aircraft, both brand new- one twin and one quad.

MAthematically, they will BOTH not have a failure in the 100,000 hours prescribed, but, once both aircraft have done the 100,000 hours, and PRESUME that they are running on the same engines as when new, then they could BOTH expect to have A failure.

IF however, after 100,000 hours, the engines WILL have a failure, then of course, the quad will have twice as many failures than the twin, hence twice the probability.

Of course if ALL engines fail at 100,000 hours, then both aircraft are in the .

The question is : if they lose all six engines, what is the probability that they will run into each other on the way down? (presuming that the quad will fall faster than the twin due heavier weight)
apache is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.