Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

F18 possible victim of Patriot

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

F18 possible victim of Patriot

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Apr 2003, 22:18
  #1 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,994
Received 2,050 Likes on 920 Posts
F18 possible victim of Patriot

U.S. Investigates 'Friendly Fire' in Hornet Crash

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. military is investigating the possibility that an American Patriot missile might have shot down a U.S. Navy F/A-18C fighter jet over Iraq, U.S. defense officials said on Thursday........

U.S. forces are still searching for the F/A-18 and the pilot, who officials said ejected in the area near Kerbala.

"We're investigating all possibilities," said one U.S. official when asked about reports that a Patriot anti-aircraft missile may have struck the Navy jet on Wednesday while the Patriot was trying to intercept two Iraqi missiles. The defense officials, who asked not to be identified, cautioned that no conclusions had been reached in the incident, which could become the second "friendly-fire" downing of a Western jet in the 2-week-old war.

Last edited by ORAC; 3rd Apr 2003 at 22:44.
ORAC is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2003, 22:56
  #2 (permalink)  
 
tony draper's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Newcastle/UK
Posts: 1,476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is a great pity, the Patriot seems to be much more reliable at taking out Iraqi missiles this time around, appears it still needs some work.
Also remember it would have had a F16 on its tally sheet if the driver had not popped off a Harm and took out the battery.
tony draper is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2003, 23:19
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: yes
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Draper: 'appears it still needs some work'
Now would that be typical British understatement?

Frankly the Patriot seems to be a positive liability. 'Traitor' might be a more apt name. Right now it is easily the most effective Iraqi weapon system, 2 kills so far.

We haven't heard the last of this, hopefully there will be nore 'accidents' like this.
Steepclimb is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2003, 23:42
  #4 (permalink)  
 
tony draper's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Newcastle/UK
Posts: 1,476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sky news has just broadcast that it has been admitted the F18 was indeed brought down by a patriot.
Also another Blue on Blue involving a F15 attack on American forces, with one dead and a unknown number injured.
tony draper is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2003, 23:38
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

You have to question why Patriots are engaging fighters at all, even if the PAC-3 radars can't positively ID them. To the best of my knowledge there have been no Iraqi Air Force fighter movements, and surely anything that did get up would be tracked by AWACS and dealt with by coalition fighters?

To shoot down one allied aircraft is unfortunate, but two is just careless, to paraphrase Oscar Wilde.
sprucemoose is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2003, 01:53
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Just behind the back of beyond....
Posts: 4,207
Received 63 Likes on 13 Posts
and three (which it would have been had that F-16 not loosed off a HARM) is downright irresponsible.
Jackonicko is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2003, 02:09
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,097
Received 61 Likes on 39 Posts
I do believe some institutional changes are in order.
West Coast is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2003, 03:14
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds more like a procedual problem, with maybe a lack of supervision!
mutleyfour is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2003, 04:23
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,097
Received 61 Likes on 39 Posts
I think the problem speaks more to the mindset rather than a procedure. I found this to be true in my interactions with USAF types. I hold out that you may be correct as that would be an easier fix.
West Coast is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2003, 15:50
  #10 (permalink)  
Lupus Domesticus
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NZ
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
West, I couldn't agree more. As I've said in a related thread, I believe the root of the problem lies not in technology, but in prevailing attitudes.

Slightly different situation, slightly different attitudinall problem; but still, one of attitude, not procedure or technology.

It's a human condition, and that means we can fix it easier.
BlueWolf is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.