Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

MOD Sued by Helo Crews

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

MOD Sued by Helo Crews

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th May 2024, 05:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,992
Received 2,046 Likes on 918 Posts
MOD Sued by Helo Crews

https://archive.ph/2024.05.29-051953...ters-jfltlr3dm

MoD faces cancer legal action over helicopter crew ‘dying from fumes’

Dozens of former pilots and aircrew are suing after being exposed to toxic emissions from British military choppers

Serving and former pilots and aircrew are allegedly dying of cancer after being unwittingly exposed to toxic exhaust fumes pumped out by British military helicopters.

The Ministry of Defence knew about the potential risks to its personnel for more than a decade and did nothing about it, according to testimony from sick personnel and their family members.

Troops who flew in Sea King, Wessex and more recently Puma and Chinook helicopters have been diagnosed with cancers such as non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, multiple myeloma, lung cancer, throat cancer and testicular cancer.

The Times can reveal that nearly 40 of those affected are in the process of suing the MoD, with the number expected to double in the coming weeks as more people come forward.

Lawyers described the cases so far as the tip of the iceberg. Those affected include personnel from all three services and of all ranks, from those in the highest positions in the armed forces to leading aircrew and sergeants….

Five former service personnel have received out-of-court settlements, including a former flight sergeant and helicopter winchman, Zach Stubbings, who trained Prince William, who also served on Sea King helicopters.….
ORAC is offline  
Old 29th May 2024, 07:35
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2024
Location: HUY/EGNJ
Age: 60
Posts: 149
Received 196 Likes on 78 Posts
Surely this legal action would also impact other countries who still use the Puma and Chinook in military service but then you have the civilian companies/organisations too, especially those who still use Puma in the oil/gas industry. This could snowball very rapidly if the link is proven.

There will be quite a number of military and civilian operators who will be watching the progress of this very closely and possibly employing their own studies and lawyers in readiness for further claims/cases.
BonnieLass is online now  
Old 29th May 2024, 07:57
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 13
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
As I recall in the early 90's we at TSW were visited to ascertain the noise, fumes etc alongside the PPE we wore during hot refuels. We did a few AC including the Wessex where the tech actually declined to let us know the readings as he wanted to pass the findings on for further analysis.......I do recall the Wessex (front refuel point) and the Seaking were particularly bad for fumes alongside the Puma (in certain conditions) and suffered from streaming eyes etc. Will be interesting if groundcrew/ TSW etc ever have this looked at alongside the Aircrew.
Jazzyg is offline  
The following 3 users liked this post by Jazzyg:
Old 29th May 2024, 09:12
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: In front of a computer
Posts: 2,393
Received 135 Likes on 62 Posts
I’ve seen studies where aircrew are shown to be 13% more likely than the population to develop non-Hodgkins Lymphoma. Some studies have linked this with exposure to cosmic radiation but this latest report about fumes is interesting. Who hasn’t been exposed to burnt Jet fuel in and around aircraft?
ETOPS is offline  
Old 29th May 2024, 10:36
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Manchester
Posts: 65
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Guardian coverage

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...ry-helicopters
slfool is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 29th May 2024, 13:44
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 3,252
Received 227 Likes on 78 Posts
"The MoD knew about the potential risk from the fumes in Sea King helicopters in 1999,"

I don't know where they got 1999 from. In 1988 every company supplying MoD were paid to go through their design records and required by law to declare hazardous substances, under the Montreal Protocol. Any positive declarations were then investigated.

That same year major technical problems and hazards caused by Sea King efflux was investigated. That was then passed to 'affected parties', as per regs, which includes aero med.

Then, from 1990, the funding was pulled as part of the savings at the expense of safety policy.

In 1990, heavy landings and crews in sick bay due to fume inhalation in Lynx (not efflux) was met with 'The RN can take a running jump, ground their aircraft, and come a-begging next year'.
tucumseh is offline  
The following 3 users liked this post by tucumseh:
Old 29th May 2024, 17:02
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Does the same issue occur in the C130 fleet, as the internal heating was from air piped over the engines as I recall??
Grimweasel is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 29th May 2024, 18:46
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,372
Received 381 Likes on 219 Posts
Originally Posted by Grimweasel
Does the same issue occur in the C130 fleet, as the internal heating was from air piped over the engines as I recall??
I very much doubt it was. Normally heating comes from bleed air mixed with ambient
212man is offline  
Old 29th May 2024, 19:00
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,775
Received 157 Likes on 79 Posts
In flight school our flight surgeon described extended hovering in zero wind conditions as “Wallowing in your own excreta!”
albatross is offline  
Old 29th May 2024, 19:17
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 4,434
Received 273 Likes on 129 Posts
The smell from the exhaust of the Bell 407 was distinctly different from our B206 fleet. Stings the eyes, catch the breath in your throat.
Ascend Charlie is offline  
Old 29th May 2024, 19:27
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Once a Squirrel Heaven (or hell!), Shropshire UK
Posts: 843
Received 20 Likes on 9 Posts
I sort of wish I hadn’t seen this. I have just begun to have a throat problem investigated, although it has taken some effort (and time) to get my GP interested. (7000hrs approx Whirlwind/Wessex/Chinook plus Gazelle + Squirrel)

Last edited by Shackman; 29th May 2024 at 20:50.
Shackman is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by Shackman:
Old 29th May 2024, 20:00
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Rural England, thank God.
Posts: 722
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts
Re the Times article, Kai Macnaughton was a feisty chap, and Clare M an equally feisty woman. She will not let this drop, and rightly so.
skua is offline  
Old 29th May 2024, 20:32
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,372
Received 381 Likes on 219 Posts
Originally Posted by skua
Re the Times article, Kai Macnaughton was a feisty chap, and Clare M an equally feisty woman. She will not let this drop, and rightly so.
What do you base the “rightly so” remark on?
212man is offline  
Old 29th May 2024, 22:03
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: England
Posts: 122
Received 8 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Shackman
I sort of wish I hadn’t seen this. I have just begun to have a throat problem investigated, although it has taken some effort (and time) to get my GP interested. (7000hrs approx Whirlwind/Wessex/Chinook plus Gazelle + Squirrel)
I wish you the best of luck shackman. I’m one of at least 3 of us (I know of) from the article who had the same tonsil/lymph node cancer. Mine was found due to a persistent lump in my neck that took a while to get diagnosed. I sincerely hope yours is nothing but please move heaven and earth to get it looked at - pay for a private consultation if you need to. So many cancers are treatable if found in time you cannot put a price on your health.

SimonK is offline  
The following 6 users liked this post by SimonK:
Old 30th May 2024, 06:44
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: sussex
Posts: 1,851
Received 23 Likes on 16 Posts
IIRC from my 13000 hrs C130K time the cargo compartment always smelt of a mixture of exhaust fumes and electric and hydraulic fumes. The tanker smelt even worse with the tanks in the cargo compartment. I also wonder what effect my groundcrew time on the Javelin, Hunter and Lightning had especially from the starting systems.
ancientaviator62 is offline  
Old 31st May 2024, 14:23
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: A very long way North
Posts: 476
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
When the weather is particularly chilly up here on the N Sea (so from August to May, I know..) it’s not uncommon to see the helideck crews standing in the engine exhaust in an attempt to keep warm. I have started telling them not to, “you really really don’t want to be breathing that in!”. They don’t seem to do it again.
PlasticCabDriver is offline  
Old 31st May 2024, 15:50
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southampton
Posts: 862
Received 61 Likes on 26 Posts
Whilst I have great sympathy for those who are suffering, where are the stats that show the number of people who do not or did not have any ill effects when they worked or flew in these aircraft?

Life isn’t always fair.
Saintsman is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2024, 15:10
  #18 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,992
Received 2,046 Likes on 918 Posts
Whilst I have great sympathy for those who are suffering, where are the stats that show the number of people who do not or did not have any ill effects when they worked or flew in these aircraft?
Presumably the evidence will come out in court.

​​​​​​​ I note Tucumseh’s comments about papers and declarations in 1988 which were passed to Aero Med and are presumably available in the archives - and that five of the original claimants received out-of-court settlements, which is not something the MOD and Treasury are known to be generous with, unless it’s to prevent evidence coming to light which would result in a far greater future liability.
ORAC is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2024, 16:18
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,372
Received 381 Likes on 219 Posts
Originally Posted by PlasticCabDriver
When the weather is particularly chilly up here on the N Sea (so from August to May, I know..) it’s not uncommon to see the helideck crews standing in the engine exhaust in an attempt to keep warm. I have started telling them not to, “you really really don’t want to be breathing that in!”. They don’t seem to do it again.
I certainly used to do that too!

I’m curious why this is being highlighted as a military problem and why the US do not have a head start in evidence and litigation.
212man is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2024, 08:53
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kammbronn
Posts: 2,124
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by 212man
I certainly used to do that too!

I’m curious why this is being highlighted as a military problem and why the US do not have a head start in evidence and litigation.
https://www.health.mil/Reference-Cen...port-Personnel

diginagain is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.