Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

RAeS Q&A Session with ACM Sir Richard Knighton

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAeS Q&A Session with ACM Sir Richard Knighton

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Jul 2023, 08:22
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,893
Received 348 Likes on 122 Posts
The loss of the previous '2000TT' credits which were available from Spring 2001 until 7 Apr 2012 was not the CAA's fault - it was entirely down to 22Gp (as it was) for failing to provide a suitable credit report. The CAA told me that they'd have been entirely happy to have continued with the existing scheme, had the RAF maintained the original credit report.

Before Part-FCL came into effetc, EASA told me at Gatwick that there was no reason why the existing military accreditation scheme shouldn't continue.

Such was the outrage at the time that an IBN was circulated stating that comments on social media weren't helping.



BEagle is online now  
Old 10th Jul 2023, 08:25
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,386
Received 734 Likes on 331 Posts
I knew 22 Gp had dropped the ball entirely but I didn't know the CAA and EASA were so on-side.

Another failure to look after the troops by the AOC at the time who probably got promoted for it.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2023, 08:34
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: London
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When one considers within the VSO there is a qualified solicitor as the Director Legal Services and on the non-Exec Board is an actual Chief HR Officer it makes one wonder how collaborative the recruitment policy making/sign-off process actually is or at the very least is no-one brave enough to shout out "put the chocks back in - you may want to rethink that because....."
Blue_one is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2023, 08:59
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,893
Received 348 Likes on 122 Posts
A typical case of poor support for their people was when we were negotiating military credit for the Part-FCL aerobatic rating, which requires 5 hr of aerobatic flight time. The RAF claimed that their basic flying training course didn't include such time - until I advised them to check the actual AR syllabus requirements, which includes various stalling and spinning exercises, amongst other things. Fortunately they then realised their mistake and the credit was duly achieved.
BEagle is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.